Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 05:09 AM Mar 2014

New anti-protest law in Australia draws public ire

Source: PBS

The Victoria state government in Australia passed a law Tuesday that will give unprecedented amounts of power to police to suppress protests. The Summary Offences and Sentencing Amendment Bill passed through the Victorian parliament despite heavy opposition within the general population. During the legislative proceedings alone, police arrested four protesters in the legislative chamber’s public viewing chamber for causing disturbances.

Under the new law, police can order protesters to disperse if they are blocking the entrance to a building, obstructing people or traffic, or most notably, if the police expect the protesters to turn violent. The penalty for violating orders to move ranges from a $720 fine to arrest and imprisonment. Under the new law, police would also be able to obtain exclusion orders banning protesters from certain public places for a period of 12 months; the violation of which carries a maximum jail sentence of two years.

While supporters of the new law say it will help to prevent anti-abortion protesters from regularly gathering outside of fertility clinics, detractors say the law goes too far and allows the government far too much power, especially in the affairs of labor disputes.

Sue Pennicuik, one of the members of Australia’s Green Party, protested the bill’s passage. “This bill is an absolute assault on the democratic right of Victorians to protest – whether it be on the streets or on public land – about issues of concern to them.”

<snip>

Read more: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/new-anti-protest-law-australia-draws-public-ire/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New anti-protest law in Australia draws public ire (Original Post) bananas Mar 2014 OP
This is partly because they want to build a multi billion dollar tunnel system without disruption Theyletmeeatcake2 Mar 2014 #1
Thuggish government blkmusclmachine Mar 2014 #2
Regional sawmills may take Tasmanian World Heritage Area timber Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #3
Govt caught lying about the condition of the Tasmanian forest areas. kristopher Mar 2014 #5
"if the police expect the protesters to turn violent" muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #4
Are first world countries becoming more totalitarian? Silly question, I know. nt raccoon Mar 2014 #6
expect this mtasselin Mar 2014 #7
Anti-protest law coming soon. They already mark you as a terrorist if you protest here. L0oniX Mar 2014 #8
Kick and run!! Theyletmeeatcake2 Mar 2014 #9
+1 n/t Catherina Mar 2014 #12
Won't be long now. DeSwiss Mar 2014 #10
Same thoughts here n/t Catherina Mar 2014 #13
So the police get to be mind readers. That is troubling. I support not allowing the blockage KittyWampus Mar 2014 #11

Theyletmeeatcake2

(348 posts)
1. This is partly because they want to build a multi billion dollar tunnel system without disruption
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 05:28 AM
Mar 2014

It's the dying days of the conservative government so they're trying to seal deals with their mates before they get voted out...pack of arseholes...they never bother about public transport because that helps the little people....it's going to be a private public partnership that means the public will be left with the mess for many years.....private businesses can't be trusted to be honest or competent ...the profit factor drives everything...

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
3. Regional sawmills may take Tasmanian World Heritage Area timber
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 06:52 AM
Mar 2014

As the Federal Government asks the World Heritage Committee to revoke some of the new areas of forest protected under the forest peace deal, the State Opposition is saying those areas would be available for logging.

While the state's largest native forest producer isn't interested in getting wood from the world heritage extension, the Tasmanian Sawmillers Association says several regional mills would use regrowth logs.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-02-03/regional-sawmills-may-take-tasmanian-world/5235836


And then there's the great barrier reef

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/mar/02/great-barrier-reef-authority-argued-against-dredge-dumping-foi-reveals

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
5. Govt caught lying about the condition of the Tasmanian forest areas.
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 07:22 AM
Mar 2014
Coalition ‘misled’ UN over bid to strip heritage listing from Tasmanian forest
Photos show 90% of the 74,000 hectares the government claims is degraded are ecologically pristine forests, says Bob Brown




The Weld Valley is under threat from the proposed world heritage delisting. Photograph: Bill Hatcher


The government has been accused of misleading the UN in its bid to strip world heritage protection from tracts of Tasmanian forest, after the release of pictures purportedly showing that ecologically pristine areas will be delisted.

Bob Brown, the former Greens leader, has released a tranche of photos from the Weld Valley, one of several areas where the government wants to remove a total of 74,000 hectares of the world heritage protection.

Brown said the images were evidence that 90% of the 74,000 hectares are “pristine, magnificent forests”. The government has argued a world heritage boundary extension last year include areas of logged, degraded forest that is being unnecessarily “locked up” from the timber industry.

The government has formally requested the world heritage committee reduce the protected Tasmanian forest area by 4.7%, claiming that the Tasmanian economy will benefit and that landholders were not properly consulted over the extension.

Brown told Guardian Australia: “The boundary has not been drawn by any environmental consistency, it’s for pure commercial expedience....

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/13/coalition-misled-un-heritage-listing-tasmanian-forest

muriel_volestrangler

(101,322 posts)
4. "if the police expect the protesters to turn violent"
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 07:09 AM
Mar 2014

That allows the police to shut anything down. "We think it would have turned violent, so we stopped the protest. There was no violence, so our action clearly worked".

mtasselin

(666 posts)
7. expect this
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 08:34 AM
Mar 2014

The time is coming where here in America we can expect this. That is how they are going to get TPP and these other trade agreements through, is there anyone that really thinks that America is the free country that we were taught.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
8. Anti-protest law coming soon. They already mark you as a terrorist if you protest here.
Thu Mar 13, 2014, 10:06 AM
Mar 2014

"You measure a democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." - Abbie Hoffman

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
11. So the police get to be mind readers. That is troubling. I support not allowing the blockage
Fri Mar 14, 2014, 09:25 AM
Mar 2014

of doorways.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New anti-protest law in A...