Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 07:08 PM Apr 2014

Iran nominates man accused of links to 1979 hostage crisis as UN ambassador

Source: Guardian

Iran has infuriated the US by nominating a new ambassador to its UN mission in New York who was a member of the student group behind the 1979 seizure of the American embassy in Tehran, when 52 diplomats were held hostage.

Hamid Aboutalebi, a political adviser in the office of the Iranian president, is seen by former hostages and some US officials as complicit in the saga. Aboutalebi has said he was not in Tehran at the time and denied involvement.

The US state department spokeswoman, Marie Harf, said on Wednesday that Tehran's decision was "extremely troubling".

"We're taking a close look at the case now, and we have raised our serious concerns about this possible nomination with the government of Iran," she said. Harf said she could not say how the US had raised the issue with the Iranian officials and refused to comment on Aboutalebi's visa process and whether he would be granted one, saying she could not comment on individual cases.

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/03/iran-un-ambassador-1979-hostage-crisis-american-embassy

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iran nominates man accused of links to 1979 hostage crisis as UN ambassador (Original Post) dipsydoodle Apr 2014 OP
A government position filled with someone of a questionable background 1000words Apr 2014 #1
You don't make peace with your friends OmahaBlueDog Apr 2014 #2
ah but Chuck Schumer and Ted Cruz are on the same page azurnoir Apr 2014 #3
Perfect, welcome him with open arms. Lasher Apr 2014 #4
It's tough work on the front lines of imperialism sometimes. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2014 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2014 #7
144 days? Nihil Apr 2014 #8
It was 444 days. Brigid Apr 2014 #9
I got the number from the post to which I replied. My comment still stands with that number too. Nihil Apr 2014 #10
If he was not in Iran, what case do they have against him? Ash_F Apr 2014 #6
 

1000words

(7,051 posts)
1. A government position filled with someone of a questionable background
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 07:15 PM
Apr 2014

Surely something that is isolated to Iran.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
2. You don't make peace with your friends
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 07:17 PM
Apr 2014

I'm not saying it doesn't bother me, but the taking of the US Hostages is -- as they say -- ancient history. It's part of a revolution that took place about 35 years ago. I'm sure that we're forced to deal with Vietnamese officials who were part of the NVA or the VC.

It's time to move on.

It's also time to move on in Cuba. The Castro brothers have done some despicable things, as did Che Guevera, but the embargo against Cuba has done nothing more to further our policies than the sanctions against Iran.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
3. ah but Chuck Schumer and Ted Cruz are on the same page
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 07:28 PM
Apr 2014
"This man has no place in the diplomatic process," Chuck Schumer, a senior Democratic party senator from New York, wrote to the US secretary of state, John Kerry. "Iran's attempt to appoint Mr Aboutalebi is a slap in the face to the Americans that were abducted, and their families. It reveals a disdain for the diplomatic process and we should push back in kind." His comments were echoed by the Republican Ted Cruz from Texas, who described Aboutalebi's appointment as "deliberately insulting and contemptuous".


ain't bi-partisanship grand

Lasher

(27,637 posts)
4. Perfect, welcome him with open arms.
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 07:30 PM
Apr 2014

Then take him hostage, along with his entourage, for 144 days. Release them after that, but only if they first give us any and all of their military paraphernalia that we might desire. And not before we parade them around like this:

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
5. It's tough work on the front lines of imperialism sometimes.
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 08:58 PM
Apr 2014

Gee, why were they so pissed with us, anyway? I mean, what did we ever do to them?

Response to Comrade Grumpy (Reply #5)

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
8. 144 days?
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 08:28 AM
Apr 2014

There are people in Guantanamo who would have loved to be released after 144 days
of being held hostage & paraded around (not to mention the other shit they got).

IOKIYAA ...



 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
10. I got the number from the post to which I replied. My comment still stands with that number too.
Mon Apr 7, 2014, 03:48 AM
Apr 2014

Indeed some of us do remember the events (including the helicopter farce) and do so
without the benefit of Holywood's rose-tinted revisions.

Thank you for the correction.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iran nominates man accuse...