Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 08:46 AM Apr 2014

Kerry warns U.S. is evaluating role in Middle East peace talks

Source: Reuters

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said on Friday Washington was evaluating whether to continue its role in Middle East peace talks, signaling his patience with the Israelis and Palestinians was running out.

Speaking during a visit to Morocco after a week of setbacks, Kerry said there was a limit to U.S. efforts if the parties themselves were unwilling to move forward.

....

U.S. officials say Kerry had been blindsided by recent Israeli and Palestinian moves that had compromised undertakings made when they launched the latest round of talks aimed at ending their enduring conflict last July.

"They say they want to continue, neither party has said they have called it off, but we are not going to sit there indefinitely," Kerry said, making his bleakest assessment yet of talks that he has dedicated a huge amount of energy to.




Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/04/us-israel-palestinian-kerry-idUSBREA330N920140404

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kerry warns U.S. is evaluating role in Middle East peace talks (Original Post) Capt. Obvious Apr 2014 OP
Good, If So gussmith Apr 2014 #1
If Palestine and Israel prefer violence to peace, then that is what they will have. JDPriestly Apr 2014 #2
Of Course You're Right gussmith Apr 2014 #3
The reason why there is violence is that someone took someone else's land. The Stranger Apr 2014 #5
"And you know which side is which" ? ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2014 #9
Are you saying the ARABS drove out most of the Jews? karynnj Apr 2014 #10
I'm not. Somehow the Romans subphrase got deleted. ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2014 #20
Arabs may have been living in Palestine but legally, the area was a British Protectorate. JDPriestly Apr 2014 #23
"Proud Member of the Reality Based Community" cpwm17 Apr 2014 #15
Literally everything you just typed is wrong. That's a rare feat. LeftyMom Apr 2014 #17
You really don't have to make up history -- it was likely during your lifetime memory. The Stranger Apr 2014 #18
We don't disagree on the historical facts. But if Israel and Palestine are to have peace, both JDPriestly Apr 2014 #21
Do They Really Want Resolution gussmith Apr 2014 #16
There have been resolutions. Tons of them. The Stranger Apr 2014 #19
The problem is I suspect is the disrupters on either side do not speak for the majority lostincalifornia Apr 2014 #14
The talks are.. sendero Apr 2014 #4
Peace won't happen... iandhr Apr 2014 #6
Good for Kerry hollowdweller Apr 2014 #7
If we are going to pull out, we should do it [i] in toto [/i] cosmicone Apr 2014 #8
I have pulled out too late before. I'm still paying child support for that one. olddad56 Apr 2014 #11
Should, I agree, but it will NEVER happen. lark Apr 2014 #13
Perhaps a strongly worded letter is in the works? 1000words Apr 2014 #12
In spite of the Obama Administration bending over backward to support this erstwhile ally... Jesus Malverde Apr 2014 #22
 

gussmith

(280 posts)
1. Good, If So
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 10:07 AM
Apr 2014

We are having to take a second look at many commitments made to America. Why not expect more and do less for these bellicose recalcitrants.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
2. If Palestine and Israel prefer violence to peace, then that is what they will have.
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 10:29 AM
Apr 2014

If either Palestine or Israel prefers violence to peace, then they will both have violence.

The two sides to the dispute have to come to the point at which peace is worth more enough to compromise. Otherwise they and their children will have more and more violence until one side or the other "wins" whatever there is left to win.

Good luck, guys.

 

gussmith

(280 posts)
3. Of Course You're Right
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 10:46 AM
Apr 2014

but it is never going to happen. They just don't care if the children have happiness as a way of life or any memory of what that might be.

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
5. The reason why there is violence is that someone took someone else's land.
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 11:45 AM
Apr 2014

And that side is still doing it (and you know which side is which).

At least we can be honest here.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
9. "And you know which side is which" ?
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 12:29 PM
Apr 2014

Last edited Fri Apr 4, 2014, 06:30 PM - Edit history (2)

No I don't. Pray tell, enlighten us.

Do you mean when the arabs conquered Israel(+), after the Romans(*) drove nearly all the jews out of it in the diaspora, purposefully destroying their most sacred holy spot, and triumphantly building a mosque upon its ashes?

Or when the jews came back, bought up some land, and asked Britain to give them sovereignty over a small portion of Palestine (which was under British control), Britain then put the matter before the U.N., who voted for the idea, Jordan then attacked, trying to destroy them, lost, and the Israelis then kicked out arabs they thought had collaborated with Jordan, and were hostile to them, whether they were or not? (Or any of the subsequent wars to destroy Israel, and territorial losses sustained when they failed spectacularly, and the subsequent rise of "settlers" who think it is their holy duty to drive non-jews out of israel.)

The reason why the Middle East is such a mess is exactly because it is filled with people like you. You imagine there is a perfect good guy and a perfect bad guy in a millennia old conflict.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community


(*) Somehow got edited out of my original text, as I rearranged sentences. My bad.

(+) Let me be even more technically correct here. I'm talking about the conquest of Jerusalem in 637 which is the territory of present day Israel, not that Israel as a state existed in that timeframe.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
10. Are you saying the ARABS drove out most of the Jews?
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 01:06 PM
Apr 2014

It was the ROMANS. The mosque was built hundreds of years later.

When the Jews returned in the early 1900s, much of the land was farmed by Palestinian tenants who had villages where they had lived for generations. In the earliest days, they coexisted. However, in 1949, there were towns where hundreds of Arabs were killed and all of the survivors exiled. Even Israeli sources have written about this including the recent book by Ari Savit.

As a Jew, I think that in Israel/Palestine, both sides have grievances, but in the last century, it is the Palestinians who are the victims.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
20. I'm not. Somehow the Romans subphrase got deleted.
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 06:24 PM
Apr 2014

Likely as I was rearranging sentences. I updated it, once I reread it. Thank you for that correction.

I also acknowledged in the original that during the first war, there were Arabs who were accused of collaborating, whether they were or not. And also that the Israeli Settlers have some rather unfortunate intentions.

However, my overall point remains. All those who lay the entirety of the blame on one side or the other aren't fixing the problem. They are the problem.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
23. Arabs may have been living in Palestine but legally, the area was a British Protectorate.
Sat Apr 5, 2014, 01:14 AM
Apr 2014

You left out the Ottoman Empire's control of the area and their loss in WWI which resulted in the British Protectorate in the area. You also forgot, and most supporters of Palestine forget that it was not just Israel that was carved out of the area but also Jordan. Jordan was considered part of the Arab Palestine. Israel was but a tiny portion of the British Protectorate.

The story of the events and legal ownership of the area following the defeat of the Ottoman Empire is here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Mandate_for_Palestine_%28legal_instrument%29

It explains why the country was a British Protectorate and why the victors of WWI could do with it what they wanted.

When your country is defeated, those who defeat you own your country and can do with it what they want. WWI changed the map of Europe and the Middle East. One reason for a country to avoid war and to compromise to have peace is to avoid a terrible loss of land and sovereignty.

Austria was the Holy Roman Empire. It was blamed for WWI, and after the war it lost all kinds of territory in Europe. That's just how these things work.

That is why the fools in Palestine and Israel should make peace. Which of them is ready to fight a war and perhaps be obliterated entirely?

 

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)
15. "Proud Member of the Reality Based Community"
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 03:15 PM
Apr 2014

No you're not. That's some obvious propaganda. Your history is totally wrong.

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
18. You really don't have to make up history -- it was likely during your lifetime memory.
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 05:08 PM
Apr 2014

1967, to be exact, when Israel took land from the Palestinians and has since refused to give it back.

1967.

Say it with me "1967."

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
21. We don't disagree on the historical facts. But if Israel and Palestine are to have peace, both
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 09:46 PM
Apr 2014

sides will have to decide what they can give up and what they should maintain. It's up to them. Outsiders cannot decide for them.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
4. The talks are..
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 11:16 AM
Apr 2014

... beyond pointless. If while you are "talking" you are trying to push a shiv into someone's belly, the "talking" is nothing more than a distraction.

 

hollowdweller

(4,229 posts)
7. Good for Kerry
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 11:54 AM
Apr 2014

Give up. Cut off aid for both countries. Let them figure it out but no US dollars go to them till they do.

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
8. If we are going to pull out, we should do it [i] in toto [/i]
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 12:24 PM
Apr 2014

That is, no more aid to either side of any kind whatsoever and get all the military hardware given to Israel back. Let them duke it out.

lark

(23,105 posts)
13. Should, I agree, but it will NEVER happen.
Fri Apr 4, 2014, 02:01 PM
Apr 2014

MIC, AIPAC & Fundamentalists are too rich and have too many congresscritters in their back pockets to even have this ever come to a vote. The US is not an honest broker, we need to stop pretending to the world that we are impartial.

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
22. In spite of the Obama Administration bending over backward to support this erstwhile ally...
Sat Apr 5, 2014, 01:08 AM
Apr 2014

The government of Israel have embarrassed and humiliated the President and the United States at EVERY opportunity.

Israel demanding the US release traitor Pollard as a condition of the peace talks was likely too much.

Facts

The United States has never provided more economic AID than under the administration of President Obama.

The United States has never provided more military aid and support then under the administration of President Obama. Under President Obama the United States pledges to ensure Israel's Qualitative Military Edge

The United States has never provided more intelligence to Israel, under the administration of President Obama, Israel has been provided with RAW unfiltered NSA DATA intercepts.

No one has been a better friend of Israel then the Administration of President Obama.

The right wing government of Israel, has repaid the United States and President Obama with endless humiliation and embarrassment.

Unprecedented open support for Mitt Romney and the Republican Party, repeated calls for traitor Pollard to be released, announcing settlements when the Vice President arrives for Peace talks, lecturing the United States and the Obama Administration as naive dupes of Iran, cozying up to china promising them military technology developed in the United States, attempting to undermine the President with congressional resolutions and many more slights. The chutzpa of the right wing government of Israel is off the charts.

With friends like these...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Kerry warns U.S. is evalu...