Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Freddie Stubbs

(29,853 posts)
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 10:47 AM Apr 2014

King may switch sides and join the Republicans after midterms

Source: The Hill

Sen. Angus King (I-Maine), who caucuses with the Democrats, will decide after the midterm elections whether to switch sides and join the Republicans.

He is leaving open the possibility of aligning himself with the GOP if control of the upper chamber changes hands.

“I’ll make my decision at the time based on what I think is best for Maine,” King told The Hill Wednesday after voting with Republicans to block the Paycheck Fairness Act, a measure at the center for the 2014 Democratic campaign agenda.

King’s remarks are a clear indication that congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle will have to woo the 70-year-old senator in order to recruit him to their side.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/203161-king-may-flip-to-gop-in-2015

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
King may switch sides and join the Republicans after midterms (Original Post) Freddie Stubbs Apr 2014 OP
Sounds like Joe (The Weasel) Lieberman (NT) The Wizard Apr 2014 #1
Yep.... he'll probably try for concessions from Reid also groundloop Apr 2014 #3
King never claimed to be a Dem, like Joe the Weasel did CanonRay Apr 2014 #5
...and Lieberman never threatened to join the Republican Caucus brooklynite Apr 2014 #11
He didn't threaten, he just joined them CanonRay Apr 2014 #20
Seriously, no he didn't brooklynite Apr 2014 #21
He supported John McCain for President. ForgoTheConsequence Apr 2014 #24
..which had nothing to do with his actions in the Senate. brooklynite Apr 2014 #25
This is just the opening round in a bidding war Recursion Apr 2014 #2
I'm shocked... JohnnyRingo Apr 2014 #4
After the elections -- oldandhappy Apr 2014 #6
anyway, we are keeping the senate! oldandhappy Apr 2014 #7
I think this is one of the most dispicable things a politician can do. enlightenment Apr 2014 #8
I agree with you about Campbell, but King was elected as an independent. Jim Lane Apr 2014 #22
Good point. enlightenment Apr 2014 #23
Never trust 'Independents.' onehandle Apr 2014 #9
There are far more Democrats Kelvin Mace Apr 2014 #13
This. n/t jtuck004 Apr 2014 #14
For Sure! Phlem Apr 2014 #16
Bingo deutsey Apr 2014 #18
And what if it ends up 50-49 repuke (counting Bernie with the Dems)? KamaAina Apr 2014 #10
Philosophically he is not a republican mainer Apr 2014 #12
Well, Phlem Apr 2014 #15
Pulling a Lieberman blkmusclmachine Apr 2014 #17
Voting against xxqqqzme Apr 2014 #19

groundloop

(11,528 posts)
3. Yep.... he'll probably try for concessions from Reid also
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 11:15 AM
Apr 2014

I don't know much about him, but based on this he sounds like a self serving dickhead.

CanonRay

(14,123 posts)
20. He didn't threaten, he just joined them
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 09:47 AM
Apr 2014

he may have caucused with the Dems so he could spy more easily.

brooklynite

(94,807 posts)
21. Seriously, no he didn't
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 12:40 PM
Apr 2014

He supported Harry Reid for Majority Leader

He supported the repeal of DADT.

He supported the DREAM Act

He supo

He supported S-CHIP

He supported the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

He supported the Senate Budget Bill and opposed the House Republican Budget Bill

He supported the Handgun Background Checks Bill

Complain all you want about his hawkish foreign policy views, but don't make things up.

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,869 posts)
24. He supported John McCain for President.
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 01:11 AM
Apr 2014

He worked to bring disgruntled Clinton supporters to support McCain.

He spoke at the Republican National Convention.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
2. This is just the opening round in a bidding war
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 11:15 AM
Apr 2014

Only matters if it's 50R/49D. In which case King will go with whoever offers him the most...

JohnnyRingo

(18,669 posts)
4. I'm shocked...
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 11:18 AM
Apr 2014

...that he labels himself as an independent.

I guess sometimes he takes the republican side, and other times he stands with the conservatives.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
6. After the elections --
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 11:30 AM
Apr 2014

Ha Ha Leave him. No wooing. Let him take responsibility for himself. He only wants to caucus with the party in control. He is showing a limited concept of having a position, having ethics.

And let Maine decide if they want this game player. Time for him to retire. Maine has a goofy governor. What is going on up there?

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
8. I think this is one of the most dispicable things a politician can do.
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 11:45 AM
Apr 2014

They are free to change affiliations, of course, but when they do it mid-term they should be required to step down. If they want to run again as whatever flavor of party they choose, that's their business.

It's bait and switch. I still recall voting for Ben Nighthorse (forked tongue) Campbell as a Dem and having him jump mid-track to the Republicans - and it still leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

Yes, I'd rather see them honestly admit that they no longer carry the ideals of their party - but they shouldn't be able to carry on in their position after doing so. They were elected on a particular platform, making particular assertions and, presumably, particular promises to the people who voted for them.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
22. I agree with you about Campbell, but King was elected as an independent.
Sun Apr 13, 2014, 11:26 PM
Apr 2014

IIRC, he defeated a Democrat and a Republicand. During the campaign he expressly refused to state whether he would caucus with the Democrats or the Republicans. It wouldn't surprise me if the particular promises that he made included just what he's doing now -- that he'd choose one party based on the exigencies of the moment.

Condemn him all you want on substance, but this is no bait and switch.

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
23. Good point.
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 12:35 AM
Apr 2014

Still leaves a bad taste in my mouth - but I appreciate the perspective you brought to it. Thank you.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
9. Never trust 'Independents.'
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 11:52 AM
Apr 2014

I know Bernie Sanders will be thrown in my face. I love the guy, but until there is a D behind his name, he's a wild card.

This ain't 'Independent Underground.'

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
10. And what if it ends up 50-49 repuke (counting Bernie with the Dems)?
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 12:23 PM
Apr 2014

A perfectly plausible scenario. It'd be all up to Angus: stay with the Dems and give Biden the tiebreaking vote, or throw the Senate to the repuke wolves.

mainer

(12,034 posts)
12. Philosophically he is not a republican
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 12:56 PM
Apr 2014

He said this before he was elected, that he'd keep his options open. He's just saying the same thing.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»King may switch sides and...