Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Mon Mar 19, 2012, 04:54 PM Mar 2012

Pentagon Finds Perils for U.S. if Israel Were to Strike Iran

Source: New York Times

By MARK MAZZETTI and THOM SHANKER
Published: March 19, 2012

WASHINGTON — A classified war game held this month to assess the American military’s capabilities to respond to an Israeli attack on Iran forecast that the strike would lead to a wider regional war, which could draw in the United States and leave hundreds of Americans dead, according to American officials.

The officials said the war game was not designed as a rehearsal for American military action — and they emphasized that the exercise’s results were not the only possible outcome of a real-world conflict. But the game has raised fears among top American planners that it may be impossible to preclude American involvement in any escalating confrontation with Iran, the officials said. In the debate among policymakers over the consequences of any possible Israeli attack, that reaction may give stronger voice to those within the White House, Pentagon and intelligence community who have warned that a strike could prove perilous for the United States.

The results of the war game were particularly troubling to Gen. James N. Mattis, who commands all American forces in the Middle East, Persian Gulf and Southwest Asia, according to officials who either participated in the Central Command exercise or who where briefed on the results and spoke on condition of anonymity because of its classified nature. When the exercise had concluded earlier this month, according to the officials, General Mattis told aides that an Israeli first-strike would likely have dire consequences across the region and for United States forces there.

The two-week war game, called “Internal Look,” played out a narrative in which the United States found it was pulled into the conflict after Iranian missiles struck a Navy warship in the Persian Gulf, killing about 200 Americans, according to officials with knowledge of the exercise. The United States then retaliated by launching its own strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/20/world/middleeast/united-states-war-game-sees-dire-results-of-an-israeli-attack-on-iran.html

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Turbineguy

(37,331 posts)
2. It doesn't matter what people at the Pentgon think.
Mon Mar 19, 2012, 05:37 PM
Mar 2012

What matters is what AIPAC orders the US Government to do.

Mosby

(16,311 posts)
4. The jury decided to let your anti-semitic statement stand.
Mon Mar 19, 2012, 06:23 PM
Mar 2012

Last edited Mon Mar 19, 2012, 07:07 PM - Edit history (1)

Though I don't think it was my alert, someone alerted before me and the alerts were combined.

I don't know much about you but I have seen your screen name in the past - do you really believe that a small group of American Jews control the us gov. ME policy?

Citizen Worker

(1,785 posts)
5. Yes, I do. One need only look at how US politicians bow and scrape before AIPAC to conclude that
Mon Mar 19, 2012, 07:12 PM
Mar 2012

this organization has an inordinate amount of power. To verify this assertion look at what AIPAC did to Cynthia McKinney.

Turbineguy

(37,331 posts)
7. It was not intended as anti-semitic.
Mon Mar 19, 2012, 07:52 PM
Mar 2012

I have relatives in Israel. I think of AIPAC as a powerful lobbying group.

It seems to be a standard reaction that any criticism of Israel or those who do its bidding is anti-semitic. Not so. It's my opinion they have it wrong and it's not because they are Jewish.

 

teddy51

(3,491 posts)
3. Damn, there finally begining to open there eyes and realzie that an attack would not
Mon Mar 19, 2012, 06:13 PM
Mar 2012

be a pretty sight.

 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
8. We annually give Isreal billions in foreign aid
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 12:43 AM
Mar 2012

and we proclaim to be their protector too. Why? They can easily fight their own battles, the six day war and Entebbe come to mind. Why is my country the world's policeman? Why do we find it necessary to flex our muscles and hold forth as the worlds policeman? It gains us no prestige around the world, only animosity. I would much prefer isolationism, or at least emulate Canada. Enough war for us, already.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
9. "...leave hundreds of Americans dead."
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 01:03 AM
Mar 2012

Hundreds? Really?

They appear to be pretending that something like this would be time limited and that the whole thing would come neatly to an end sometime not too long after it started.

Give me a fucking break.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
12. It sounds like the outcome of their war game was disappointing
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 07:09 PM
Mar 2012

Disappointing, but not bad enough to actively discourage our great and good friends the Israelis from doing whatever they want to do. The solution the Pentagon will propose will probably include a big increase in their appropriations budget, if Israel bombs Iran. And if Israel doesn't bomb Iran, they'll probably need a bigger increase, just in case.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pentagon Finds Perils for...