Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 08:39 AM Apr 2014

Danish media: Rasmussen had a recorder when he met with Putin

Source: ITAR-TASS

COPENHAGEN, April 18. /ITAR-TASS/. During a private talk with Vladimir Putin, Anders Fogh Rasmussen indeed had a recorder with him, Denmark's Ritzau news agency reports. The meeting of Rasmussen and Putin took place in Brussels in 2002, when Denmark presided in the European Union.

During his annual call-in session with the nation on Thursday, Putin expressed indignation at the fact that current NATO Secretary-General Rasmussen once, when he was Danish prime minister, secretly taped him without permission and published the private talk. “He asked me to meet. The meeting was not planned. I agreed. We met and talked, and as it turned out he had taken a voice recorder with him, secretly taped our talk and later published it in the press,” Putin said. “I could not believe it. Some nonsense,” Putin said.

Rasmussen explained that he had recorded the talk for history. “It was flattering to me, of course. However, he should have informed me in advance or at least ask permission to publish the conversation,” Putin noted.

“What trust may there be after such incidents?” the Russian leader asked.

The NATO secretary-general's special adviser Jonas Torp denied the claim. The accusations were absurd, he stated. During his tenure as prime minister, Rasmussen did not bring a voice recorder with him to tape talks with Putin or anybody else, he said.


Read more: http://en.itar-tass.com/world/728609



NATO: 'Fly-on-the-Wall' Film Behind Vladimir Putin's Rasmussen Jab

A North Atlantic Treaty Organization spokeswoman blamed a "fly-on-the-wall documentary" as the source of Russian President Vladimir Putin's claim that Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen was using a Dictaphone while he was Danish prime minister to secretly record a meeting.

Mr. Putin levied the Dictaphone accusation against Mr. Rasmussen Thursday during a widely covered question and answer session, using it as an example of why NATO's chief couldn't be trusted. Oana Lungescu, a NATO spokeswoman, said Thursday that the accusations were "complete nonsense" since Mr. Rasmussen never wore a Dictaphone to meetings.

...

Mr. Gulbrandsen, a journalist with Danish public broadcaster DR, told Politiken that his subject was indeed wearing a microphone when he met with Mr. Putin in Brussels in 2002. Mr. Rasmussen was wearing the microphone to be heard during a meeting with journalists, and he didn't take it off when he later met with Mr. Putin

..

The conversation with Mr. Putin was portrayed in Mr. Gulbrandsen's film. Mr. Rasmussen is quoted as having said to Mr. Putin: "your journalists are at least as critical as ours." Mr. Putin is quoted in the documentary as having answered "they are bandits, all of them."
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304626304579509210505041706
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Danish media: Rasmussen had a recorder when he met with Putin (Original Post) jakeXT Apr 2014 OP
Anders Fogh Rasmussen-- Bush, the WMD and IRAQ INVASION KoKo Apr 2014 #1

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
1. Anders Fogh Rasmussen-- Bush, the WMD and IRAQ INVASION
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 09:33 AM
Apr 2014

Anders Fogh Rasmussen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Fogh_Rasmussen



War in Iraq--Under Rasmussen, Denmark supported American foreign policies.

As Prime Minister, Rasmussen strongly supported the 2003 Iraq War. As in most European countries he faced considerable opposition, both in the parliament and in the general population. Subsequent opinion polls suggested the Danish population's opinion was split on the issue. One vocal protester managed to get into the Danish parliament during the period before the war, where he poured red paint on the prime minister while yelling "Du har blod på dine hænder" (literally: "You have blood on your hands&quot . A member of the Danish parliament for the socialist Red-Green Alliance, Pernille Rosenkrantz-Theil, stated that it was a reaction she might have made under the circumstances, although she later denounced such behaviour. Denmark was one of only five countries to take part in the actual invasion operations (the others being the U.S, UK, Poland and Australia) though the contingent mainly consisted of two minor warships and staff and radio units that were never involved in actual combat. In the months after the initial phase of the war, Danish troops participated in the multi-national force stationed in Iraq. Approximately 550 Danish troops were stationed in Iraq from 2004 and into 2007, first at "Camp Dannevang" and later at "Camp Einherjer", both near Basra. When the contingent of troops left around August 2007, it was not replaced and Denmark shifted its focus to non-military support around Baghdad. The official reason provided is that the Iraqi government should now be able to handle security in the Basra area. Critics of Rasmussen argued that the withdrawal was motivated by decreasing domestic support for the war.

In 2004 Rasmussen's government came under attack based on questions of how much intelligence it had with regard to Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. The government held hearings, and was forced to publish classified reports it had consulted about the likelihood of banned weapons existing in Iraq. While the Blair and Bush administrations became the subject of criticism for extended periods because of their reliance on questionable intelligence, Rasmussen stayed clear of this controversy. This is probably largely because the motion passed by parliament (Folketinget) authorising the deployment of Danish troops states as the reason for the deployment Iraq's continued refusal to cooperate with UN inspectors in violation of the UN Security Council's resolution. The Danish deployment of troops was thus not formally based on a claim that Iraq had WMD's.

Rasmussen stated as one of the reasons to support a military intervention, "Irak har masseødelæggelsesvåben. Det er ikke noget vi tror. Vi ved det. Irak har selv indrømmet, at det har haft sennepsgas, nervegas, miltbrand, men Saddam vil ikke afregne. Han vil ikke fortælle os, hvor og hvordan de våben er blevet destrueret. Det ved vi fra FN's inspektører, så der er ingen tvivl i mit sind." (In English: "Iraq has WMDs. It is not something we think, it is something we know. Iraq has itself admitted that it has had mustard gas, nerve gas, anthrax, but Saddam won't disclose. He won't tell us where and how these weapons have been destroyed. We know this from the UN inspectors, so there is no doubt in my mind.&quot .[citation needed]

The Danish Defence Intelligence Service (FE) produced a classified report stating that it had no absolute proof of WMDs in Iraq. Rasmussen had access to this report and used it in other parts of his decision. Since the presence of substantial WMDs in Iraq was later refuted, Rasmussen has focused almost exclusively on the tyrannical nature of Saddam Hussein's regime.[citation needed] A former FE analyst, Major Frank Grevil, was sentenced to four months in prison for leaking the information to the press. Grevil argued that Rasmussen either lied about or misunderstood the content of the secret reports in his presentations to parliament. During Rasmussen's administrations, Denmark deployed troops to Afghanistan, Bosnia and Kosovo. All three missions met only minor political opposition. Rasmussen as a prime minister rejected insistent demands from the opposition for investigations into Denmark's involvement in the Iraq war, similar to the ones in the United States and the UK, on the grounds that the his government took arms against Saddam not because of possible arms possessed, but because of Saddam's failure to comply with UN resolutions.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Danish media: Rasmussen h...