Navy reprimands ex-StratCom deputy commander in fake poker-chips case
Source: Omaha World Herald
By Steve Liewer
Rear Adm. Timothy Giardina's long wait for justice in last year's fake poker-chip scandal finally is over.
The Navy announced late Monday that Giardina the former deputy commander at U.S. Strategic Command at Offutt Air Force Base had been convicted of two counts of conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman in a nonjudicial proceeding called admiral's mast.
The charges involved lying to an investigator from the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation and failing to turn in to authorities three $500 poker chips that Giardina later said he had found in a restroom at a Council Bluffs casino. He spent the chips at the poker tables. They later were determined to be counterfeit.
The presiding officer, Adm. Bill Gorney, issued a punitive letter of reprimand and ordered Giardina to forfeit $4,000.
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://www.omaha.com/article/20140505/NEWS/140509109/1685#navy-reprimands-ex-stratcom-deputy-commander-in-fake-poker-chips-case
snooper2
(30,151 posts)LOL
Enrique
(27,461 posts)okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)head of SAC you need to be beyond reproach. I don't want the guy in charge of the nukes in this country (among other things) to feel the need to lie to investigators over some friggin' poker chips.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Does tend to raise red flags for investigators.
So yeah, I'd say a scandal.
24601
(3,962 posts)over all operational (on station) nuclear weapons platforms and this guy was the three-star Deputy Commander. People in Personnel Reliability Program positions are temporarily taken off nuclear duty for all kinds of things including being sick and on meds that could make your drowsy. Think of nuclear reliability standards not unlike Secret Service officers charged with protecting the President.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)He'll probably put in for retirement sometime in the next couple of weeks. He would never get promoted or be given another decent command with that in his service jacket.
24601
(3,962 posts)rank in which your served without misconduct. It's likely going to be Read Admiral Upper Half - two stars.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)24601
(3,962 posts)time - don't recall if it's 3, 4 or 6 months, an officer reverts to his/her permanent rank. While the Senate approves all regular promotions grade O-4 & above, they are almost always unanimous consent of a list. The difference comes in that all 3 & 4 star positions also require Senate confirmation.
Angleae
(4,487 posts)http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ex-navy-nuke-chief-timothy-giardina-guilty-gambling-charges-n97891?cid=par-aff-gray-wjhg-military_20140508
Also, IIRC, once promoted to 3-star rank, it is permanent barring article 15 or court-martial. The "reverting to permanent rank" is a WWII era policy and long since discarded.
24601
(3,962 posts)Instead go to a credible primary source: Para 10b, CJCSI 1331.01D, dated1 August 2010
http://www.dtic.mil/cjcs_directives/cdata/unlimit/1331_01.pdf
"b. 10 USC 601(b)(4) provides that, pending retirement, the O-9 or O-10
grade may be held for no more than 60 days following departure from the
position of importance and responsibility while awaiting retirement. The 60-
day period begins on the day the officer is relieved from the position. On the
61st day, the officer will revert to the permanent grade (normally two-star),
until retirement at the grade approved by the Secretary of Defense. Should an
officer exceed the 60-day limit while waiting retirement, that headspace will
become available for the replacement on the 61st day."
Also, Article 15s (Captain's/Admiral's Mast in the Navy) cannot reduce the rank of Commissioned Officers.
I had forgotten that permanent ranks still exist at all. I looked it up and the 3 and 4 star ranks are still duty / temporary ranks rather than permanent ranks. In general, officers cannot be demoted below their permanent rank without a full court marshal but most of the distinction was eliminated after WWII.