Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Grassy Knoll

(10,118 posts)
Tue May 6, 2014, 06:30 PM May 2014

Benghazi Select Committee Will Have 7 Republicans, 5 Democrats

Source: talkingpointsmemo.com

The soon-to-be-formed select committee to investigate the Benghazi attacks will have 7 Republican members and 5 Democratic members, a senior GOP leadership aide confirmed to TPM on Tuesday afternoon.

That means Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) will reject a request by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) that the panel be evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats in order to be "fair."

Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/benghazi-select-committee-ratio

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Benghazi Select Committee Will Have 7 Republicans, 5 Democrats (Original Post) Grassy Knoll May 2014 OP
how many embassies and deaths under W and NOT ONE WORD? randys1 May 2014 #1
There is nothing we can do about that, now. Baitball Blogger May 2014 #18
Yep, so in a way the impeachment over nothing is kind of his fault randys1 May 2014 #19
In Obama's favor, I think his presidency has been pretty stellar compared to Baitball Blogger May 2014 #22
now there is a surprise rurallib May 2014 #2
I agree completely. tonybgood May 2014 #15
Do what they did on the Katrina investigation Mnpaul May 2014 #23
I also agree. Refuse to participate. Scuba May 2014 #24
With no Democrats The Wizard May 2014 #27
My anger level rises just reading this stuff. BUT GOPee May 2014 #30
"fair" Laf.La.Dem. May 2014 #3
well of course! oldandhappy May 2014 #4
Participation means giving credibility to the committee. earthside May 2014 #5
I hope the Democrats surprise me and... Mike Nelson May 2014 #6
100% right madaboutharry May 2014 #7
Trumped up impeachment proceedings can't be far behind groundloop May 2014 #8
Let them. HooptieWagon May 2014 #10
Lets not be hasty. HooptieWagon May 2014 #9
LOL itsrobert May 2014 #29
Hey, look! House Republicans are creating a "Jobs Committee". Blue State Bandit May 2014 #11
LOL, unfortunately. kairos12 May 2014 #14
What another INVESTIGATION??? dicksmc3 May 2014 #12
I suggest that everyone just ignore this charade...including the media. nt kelliekat44 May 2014 #13
won't BENGHAZI happen BANGHAZI because it's BENGHAZI an BENGHAZI election BENGHAZI year groundloop May 2014 #21
Orange thumb spotted on scales of justice Blue Owl May 2014 #16
POTUS ought to threaten to add 2 more supremes to scotus leftyohiolib May 2014 #17
Nancy's been smoking crack if she thinks anything about LibGranny May 2014 #20
Benghazi.... Aviation Pro May 2014 #25
It annoys me how the story is this and not the Libyan overthrow. Ash_F May 2014 #26
Shouldn't any democrat decline to serve jimlup May 2014 #28
Yesterday I read about how masterfully Pelosi played this - how she "demanded" 6-6 Doctor_J May 2014 #31
Nancy needs to refuse to name any Democrats to that committee. Adrahil May 2014 #32

randys1

(16,286 posts)
1. how many embassies and deaths under W and NOT ONE WORD?
Tue May 6, 2014, 06:31 PM
May 2014

how many died on 911 and Bush refused to answer questions under oath?

You rightwingers are terrorists, you are enemies of the United States

Baitball Blogger

(46,735 posts)
18. There is nothing we can do about that, now.
Tue May 6, 2014, 07:40 PM
May 2014

Unfortunately, it was Obama's call to "lean forward." A good offense makes the best defense, but it was his choice to stop the investigations that would have put the Republicans on their heels.

Baitball Blogger

(46,735 posts)
22. In Obama's favor, I think his presidency has been pretty stellar compared to
Tue May 6, 2014, 07:47 PM
May 2014

past administrations. It will make it easier to fight the right-wing Benghazi witchhunt. But, make no mistake, we will need to step in and do our part to shout them down.

I see shades of the Clinton witchhunt repeating, because they have absolutely nothing left in their playbook.

rurallib

(62,423 posts)
2. now there is a surprise
Tue May 6, 2014, 06:36 PM
May 2014

I hope no Democrats accept the invitation. Then it will be a kangaroo court and America can see in full display what clowns the baggers are.

tonybgood

(218 posts)
15. I agree completely.
Tue May 6, 2014, 07:19 PM
May 2014

Show this farce for what it is. Every Democrat should refuse appointment to this committee. Make the Republicans staff it and spend the taxpayer's money on it and show it for the partisan witch hunt that it is. Refuse to cooperate!!!

The Wizard

(12,545 posts)
27. With no Democrats
Tue May 6, 2014, 08:25 PM
May 2014

it will be perceived for what it is, a partisan witch hunt. With Democrats in the minority they have no input anyway.

GOPee

(58 posts)
30. My anger level rises just reading this stuff. BUT
Tue May 6, 2014, 10:30 PM
May 2014

If no one on our side is there to cross examine the witnesses that we know will appear, and pretty well know what they will say. Without a vigorous cross examination their statement will go unchallenged, and probably be even meaner knowing it won't be called out. That is my 2 cents.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
5. Participation means giving credibility to the committee.
Tue May 6, 2014, 06:42 PM
May 2014

Especially now that the 'select committee' is unbalanced, the House Democrats should not participate.

Even if a 'final report' is 'approved' in a 7-5 vote, the participation of Democrats will be used by the Repuglicans to insist that it was a credible process.

If the House Repuglicans have not been able to conduct any competent committee investigations over the last nearly two years on this matter, then why should anyone expect that they can do so now with a 'select committee'?

Let's hope that Leader Pelosi calls Boehner's bluff on this and tells him and his 'select committee' to take a hike.

Mike Nelson

(9,959 posts)
6. I hope the Democrats surprise me and...
Tue May 6, 2014, 06:47 PM
May 2014

...refuse to participate. It will make the investigation look like what it is.

groundloop

(11,519 posts)
8. Trumped up impeachment proceedings can't be far behind
Tue May 6, 2014, 06:58 PM
May 2014

You gotta' give the GOPers credit for one thing, they're good at playing dirty.
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
10. Let them.
Tue May 6, 2014, 07:05 PM
May 2014

An impeachment conviction will never get 67 votes in the Senate, and GOP will look every bit the fools. And Obama has the trump card... turning over evidence of BushCo war crimes to DoJ and ICC.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
9. Lets not be hasty.
Tue May 6, 2014, 07:02 PM
May 2014

If the Dems are permitted to call witnesses, then there are some points to be scored... even though we know what the partisan result will be. For instance:

1) Supoena Lindsay Graham and Lara Logan to testify under oath their cozy relationship in fabricating a story.
2) Supoena members of Congress for blocking legislation funding security upgrades.
3) Supoena BushCo officials to testify about embassy attacks under shrub, and lessons learned.

So Dems can score points. If they are merely relegated to an observer role, then they can speak out about the obvious kangaroo court. None of this is possible if they boycott.

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
11. Hey, look! House Republicans are creating a "Jobs Committee".
Tue May 6, 2014, 07:07 PM
May 2014

How to keep their jobs, and deny one for Hillary.

dicksmc3

(262 posts)
12. What another INVESTIGATION???
Tue May 6, 2014, 07:09 PM
May 2014

Boner and his boys are hell bent to find anything on this non-issue!! This is gonna bite 'em in the ass come election time!! I wish Nancy would have just kept her mouth shut... This is a waste of taxpayer money!!!

groundloop

(11,519 posts)
21. won't BENGHAZI happen BANGHAZI because it's BENGHAZI an BENGHAZI election BENGHAZI year
Tue May 6, 2014, 07:44 PM
May 2014

The media BENGHAZI will eat BENGHAZI this BENGHAZI shit up.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
26. It annoys me how the story is this and not the Libyan overthrow.
Tue May 6, 2014, 08:25 PM
May 2014

Which is still a shit show, by the way.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
31. Yesterday I read about how masterfully Pelosi played this - how she "demanded" 6-6
Wed May 7, 2014, 10:49 AM
May 2014

Raise your hand if you're tired of spending time, money, and votes on the Washington Generals.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
32. Nancy needs to refuse to name any Democrats to that committee.
Wed May 7, 2014, 11:59 AM
May 2014

It's a partisan masturbation exercise. Don't lend it ANY legitimacy.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Benghazi Select Committee...