Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,969 posts)
Thu Mar 22, 2012, 06:54 PM Mar 2012

Senate moves insider trading bill to Obama's desk

Source: Los Angeles Times

By Lisa Mascaro

March 22, 2012, 3:10 p.m.
Reporting from Washington—

Congress gave final approval to one of the most sweeping ethics laws in years, clamping down on insider trading by lawmakers and administration officials in an election year push to improve the public's low opinion of political Washington.

The Senate advanced the legislation overwhelmingly on Thursday, 96-3, sending it to President Obama, who had called for such a measure during his State of the Union address.

Few lawmakers wanted to stand in the way of ethics reforms, and the once-modest bill was received with gusto in Congress -- even though one of its most compelling provisions was stripped by Republicans in the House.

A popular amendment would have shed sunlight on the evolving trade in "political intelligence" -- the practice of selling the inside scoop on legislative action to traders on Wall Street. It won bipartisan support in the Senate last month only to be gutted by House GOP leaders.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-senate-passes-stock-act-20120322,0,622109.story

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate moves insider trading bill to Obama's desk (Original Post) Eugene Mar 2012 OP
Wake me when Congresspeople are lifetime banned from lobbying. nt onehandle Mar 2012 #1
Sorry but a lifetime bans unreasonable or atleast it is imo. cstanleytech Mar 2012 #2
Why not make them report their bribes er lobbying? WE need to public finance federal elections Vincardog Mar 2012 #3

cstanleytech

(26,338 posts)
2. Sorry but a lifetime bans unreasonable or atleast it is imo.
Thu Mar 22, 2012, 07:39 PM
Mar 2012

A ban for 4 to 6 years though I would support because it gives enough time for there to be some churn in who holds varies offices.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
3. Why not make them report their bribes er lobbying? WE need to public finance federal elections
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 02:15 PM
Mar 2012

and outlaw bribes completely.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate moves insider trad...