Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 11:28 AM Mar 2012

Facebook speaks out against employers asking for passwords

Source: CNN

Facebook has weighed in on a practice by some businesses asking employees or job applicants for their passwords to the popular social-media site. In a nutshell? Facebook says don't do it unless you want to get sued.

"This practice undermines the privacy expectations and the security of both the user and the user's friends," Erin Egan, the site's chief privacy officer, wrote Friday on the site's Facebook and Privacy Page. "It also potentially exposes the employer who seeks this access to unanticipated legal liability."

... (W)e don't think it's right the thing to do," she said. "But it also may cause problems for the employers that they are not anticipating. For example, if an employer sees on Facebook that someone is a member of a protected group (e.g. over a certain age, etc.) that employer may open themselves up to claims of discrimination if they don't hire that person."

... In her post, Egan said that Facebook will consider going to court if it hears of the practice continuing.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/23/tech/social-media/facebook-employers/index.html`

54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Facebook speaks out against employers asking for passwords (Original Post) Newsjock Mar 2012 OP
Good for Facebook, though it probably won't work. Vidar Mar 2012 #1
And a lot of disqualifiers in their threats, too. Lukewarm. freshwest Mar 2012 #2
'Lukewarm'? What else can they do? randome Mar 2012 #23
this is bullshit FirstLight Mar 2012 #3
Some Employers have been doing credit checks as terms of employment for some time, now this. I still_one Mar 2012 #7
"are you now or have you ever been a member of the communist party." +1 -nt CrispyQ Mar 2012 #11
"Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the communist party?" FailureToCommunicate Mar 2012 #16
I happen to be very good behrstar Mar 2012 #18
Exactly! FirstLight Mar 2012 #38
Not sure about the legality because with a password, they can access friends info too lark Mar 2012 #26
Just use a pseudonyme on Face Book and tell them you don't have an account and don't use Monk06 Mar 2012 #41
Yes, there's been a scam recently klook Mar 2012 #48
Maybe I'm naive, but I sitll don't understand the reason for requesting such information... KansDem Mar 2012 #4
Your showing them your profile is one thing; giving them passwords is another. BadgerKid Mar 2012 #5
Potential employers are making applicants log into their facebook accounts. Lasher Mar 2012 #40
If you need a job that badly that you are willing to be a slave, then just be a slave. Monk06 Mar 2012 #43
A young man in our community did just that a week ago - told the interviewer to go fuck himself. Lasher Mar 2012 #45
The best reply is to tell the interviewer the company they represent is not a legitimate employer Monk06 Mar 2012 #46
I couldn't do that. Lasher Mar 2012 #47
Make that a baker's dozen! klook Mar 2012 #49
The reason is that thanks to President Lincoln, the 1% can no longer own people de jure nxylas Mar 2012 #37
Now THAT's taking the long view! FailureToCommunicate Mar 2012 #50
Make no mistake, the restoration of slavery is the ultimate Republican goal nxylas Mar 2012 #54
I'm glad FB is taking a public position on this but...... Swede Atlanta Mar 2012 #6
Here's another major problem I have with this whole "asking for passwords" crap . . . HughBeaumont Mar 2012 #8
I wouldn't hire someone who willingly gave me their login and password arcane1 Mar 2012 #19
EXACTLY! HughBeaumont Mar 2012 #24
The Willingness to Violate a Contract (the Terms of Service) for Financial Gain… AndyTiedye Mar 2012 #30
I've never heard of that practice.... wondering what companies have done it groundloop Mar 2012 #9
CUE THE VONAGE THEME! rocktivity Mar 2012 #10
Blunt Amendment and now Iliyah Mar 2012 #12
Employers asking for this need to be publicly outed and shamed JBoy Mar 2012 #13
A list of such employers needs to exist. (nt) Posteritatis Mar 2012 #34
Facebook is another word for an invasion of privacy. efhmc Mar 2012 #14
+1. freshwest Mar 2012 #29
reminds of the title, "Drug lords targeted by Fast and Furious were FBI informants" Trillo Mar 2012 #15
Irony? quakerboy Mar 2012 #17
It's like asking for your checking acct PIN # or asking to read your postal mail. Lex Mar 2012 #20
My employer hasn't asked for passwords, but does "Facebook Stalk" us Papagoose Mar 2012 #21
This is why I have no "friends" on FB from work lark Mar 2012 #27
Can't Facebook add to their terms of use that this is forbidden? harun Mar 2012 #22
It Already Is Forbidden Under their Terms of Service AndyTiedye Mar 2012 #31
Password sharing is forbidden under nearly every TOS out there. (nt) Posteritatis Mar 2012 #32
I would sue for discrimination... nradisic Mar 2012 #25
What would the discrimination be? Lex Mar 2012 #28
I'd go for conspiracy to coerse information under duress SemperEadem Mar 2012 #35
LOL, after Facebook's long history of spying on "customers" just1voice Mar 2012 #33
exactly SemperEadem Mar 2012 #36
Facebook is only compaining because it views password sharing as data mining. They Monk06 Mar 2012 #44
Good for Facebook! Odin2005 Mar 2012 #39
Facebook users should be able to have a record who accesses their account Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2012 #42
If someone else has your password, then the records would say you were the one accessing it. (nt) Posteritatis Mar 2012 #53
We need a Constitutional right of privacy. snot Mar 2012 #51
Facebook concerned with privacy rights? Oh, the irony! nt JustABozoOnThisBus Mar 2012 #52
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
23. 'Lukewarm'? What else can they do?
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 01:27 PM
Mar 2012

They have no legal authority. They're just a social networking site. It's good enough they said SOMETHING about it.

FirstLight

(13,364 posts)
3. this is bullshit
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 11:35 AM
Mar 2012

Employers are playing on the unemployment numbers by becoming more and more draconian in their requests...

I'd tell my employer to fuck off before i'd give them that info...

still_one

(92,394 posts)
7. Some Employers have been doing credit checks as terms of employment for some time, now this. I
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 11:48 AM
Mar 2012

would NOT give any employer my Facebook account, and most likely would create a pseudo front account that I would not use, and give them that if push came to force, however, I really wonder about the legality of these requests

Are they going to start asking what forums of social sites you belong to? Sounds so similar to the days of mccarthy, "are you now or have you ever been a member of the communist party."

What a real messed up country this is becoming


behrstar

(64 posts)
18. I happen to be very good
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 12:31 PM
Mar 2012

at what I do (Architecture / Design / Construction). An employer who wants to check my credit, my FB postings, or have me pee in a cup can go to hell. I am lucky to be self-employed. But the afore mentioned issues are definitely a big part of WHY I am self employed. Furthemore, Clients who don't support my right to equal protection in the form of same-sex marriage can find themselves another Architect.

Have I lost Clients on occassion? Yes. Am I less financially wealthy than I might be if I didn't have these requirements? Probably. DO I sleep well at night? Yes! Do I take advantage of other people or allow then to take advantage of me? Hell no.

And most important of all, am I a happy, productive, honorable member of society?
Yes, I am

lark

(23,155 posts)
26. Not sure about the legality because with a password, they can access friends info too
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 02:26 PM
Mar 2012

I didn't get on FB for years and years because of this concern, then decided WTF, I'm not looking for a different job so not likely to have problems.

If something happened, and I had to find a new job, I'd do what you suggest and open up a new email account on Yahoo or some other generic place, make a new FB account and not add any friends or info at all. What my friends or family is doing is none of their damn business and if they push it, well, then, that's no company I want to support.

Monk06

(7,675 posts)
41. Just use a pseudonyme on Face Book and tell them you don't have an account and don't use
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 12:25 AM
Mar 2012

a pic of yourself as a profile icon and restrict all access to your profile pic folder. And leave your profile empty.

So called employers may be just Craigs List Data Mining Mother Fuckers. Any legit employer wouldn't even ask that question.

klook

(12,165 posts)
48. Yes, there's been a scam recently
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 07:00 AM
Mar 2012

where rogue data miners post job opportunities on monster.com (and elsewhere, I'm sure) and get applicants' info, including SSN. This sounds like a similar deal, only worse in some ways.

I don't use FB anyway because of privacy concerns, but if any employer tried to me to cough up this kind of info I'd laugh at them.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
4. Maybe I'm naive, but I sitll don't understand the reason for requesting such information...
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 11:37 AM
Mar 2012

If I were an applicant and had a FaceBook account and was asked to surrender my password, could I request such information from the interviewer? The HR department? Managers and supervisors? The CEO?

At what level in the hierarchy does this become a "no-no?"

BadgerKid

(4,555 posts)
5. Your showing them your profile is one thing; giving them passwords is another.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 11:39 AM
Mar 2012

I believe disseminating your password is generally against Terms of Service of practically all web sites.

Lasher

(27,636 posts)
40. Potential employers are making applicants log into their facebook accounts.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 11:42 PM
Mar 2012

Then the job interviewer takes over the keyboard. If you refuse, you are shown the door.

Monk06

(7,675 posts)
43. If you need a job that badly that you are willing to be a slave, then just be a slave.
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 12:39 AM
Mar 2012

I would just tell them I don't have a FB or MySpace account. Don't do social media
go fuck yourself.

It's like asking for the password to your bank account. Go fuck yourself no legitimate
employer would ask that question and only a desperate job applicant would go along
with it.

In the end you always have the option to get out of the chair, thank the interviewer for
their time and walk out the door.

Lasher

(27,636 posts)
45. A young man in our community did just that a week ago - told the interviewer to go fuck himself.
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 01:03 AM
Mar 2012

But it is an understatement to say there are a lot of people who are desperate for a job.

But this was not my point. I know how employers are avoiding possible ramifications of demanding Facebook login IDs and passwords. I just wanted to share that information, hoping to contribute to the discourse.

Monk06

(7,675 posts)
46. The best reply is to tell the interviewer the company they represent is not a legitimate employer
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 01:07 AM
Mar 2012

and that you going to go home and log onto FaceBook and tell the world
about that company's hiring practices.

That should shrink a few sphincters.

Lasher

(27,636 posts)
47. I couldn't do that.
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 01:11 AM
Mar 2012

I don't have a Facebook account. There's probably about a dozen of us left on earth.

klook

(12,165 posts)
49. Make that a baker's dozen!
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 07:15 AM
Mar 2012


On the downside, unless you're <40, many interviewers will interpret "No Facebbok acct." as "OLD" and therefore "a tosser."

That's one reason why self-employment is looking better and better.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
37. The reason is that thanks to President Lincoln, the 1% can no longer own people de jure
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:42 PM
Mar 2012

So they have to settle for de facto.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
54. Make no mistake, the restoration of slavery is the ultimate Republican goal
Sun Mar 25, 2012, 06:26 AM
Mar 2012

Maybe they won't take the ultimate step of repealing the 13th amendment and allowing one person to legally own another, but their assaults on workers' rights are aimed at making working conditions as close to slavery as the Constitution will allow.

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
6. I'm glad FB is taking a public position on this but......
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 11:43 AM
Mar 2012

The reality is that employers will continue to exact whatever information they want from prospective candidates as long as they have more candidates than positions. The only way to combat this is to legislate what an employer may legally request of an employee as part of the hiring process.

Whatever that employer may want to do outside of their engagement with the prospective employee such as a background check, hiring a private investigator to ferret out information, etc. is probably something there is little anyone can do to prevent.

But there needs to be some "leveling" of the playing field between employers and employees. While I am not a big fan of unions (having been a member for 10 years), at least employees had a formal process to influence employer behavior. Today it is the wild west with the employer having all the power.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
8. Here's another major problem I have with this whole "asking for passwords" crap . . .
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 11:48 AM
Mar 2012

Corporations constantly put their employees through compliance training, which among other things, schools the employee on what signifies "private" information and what is eligible for disclosure and not eligible according to federal laws. Pretty much all personal information, such as account numbers, passwords, etc, is secure and classified.

So what I'm hearing is that "Those rules protect and only apply to US. YOU . . . not so much"??

Isn't that kind of violating their own policy when they ask for applicant's passwords?

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
19. I wouldn't hire someone who willingly gave me their login and password
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 12:53 PM
Mar 2012

I'd consider them an untrustworthy security risk.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
24. EXACTLY!
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 01:38 PM
Mar 2012

Wouldn't an HR staffer actually think that the person who's more in line with a company's compliance standards and the acts that regulate these standards be the better candidate?

AndyTiedye

(23,500 posts)
30. The Willingness to Violate a Contract (the Terms of Service) for Financial Gain…
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 02:54 PM
Mar 2012

…would seem like a black mark to me. Would such a person honor his agreements with the company?

groundloop

(11,522 posts)
9. I've never heard of that practice.... wondering what companies have done it
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 11:56 AM
Mar 2012

Of course Facebook didn't exist when I started my current job (I'll have to mention that to my daughter - life without Facebook).

rocktivity

(44,577 posts)
10. CUE THE VONAGE THEME!
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 11:58 AM
Mar 2012

Last edited Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:17 PM - Edit history (1)

Giving out your login is as much a violation of Facebook as it is of you!!!


rocktivity

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
12. Blunt Amendment and now
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 12:08 PM
Mar 2012

this. Seems like the GOP wants total control over every single American. Freedom my ass. These mother effers don't know what freedom mean.

quakerboy

(13,921 posts)
17. Irony?
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 12:24 PM
Mar 2012

The idea of Facebook as protector of privacy is almost farcical, given their own track record.

Lex

(34,108 posts)
20. It's like asking for your checking acct PIN # or asking to read your postal mail.
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 12:53 PM
Mar 2012

Where will they stop? If someone sends me a personal email through Facebook, these days it's no different than a letter mailed to me. Why does an employer get to access it?

Sure my checking account transactions might be interesting to my employer, but why would they get to access it.

Just because something might give an employer information, it doesn't mean they deserve to have that level of access.

Papagoose

(428 posts)
21. My employer hasn't asked for passwords, but does "Facebook Stalk" us
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 01:21 PM
Mar 2012

I am in mid-level management. I unfriended all my coworkers and bosses when I learned that people over me were going through people's profiles and saving screenshots of what they considered suspicious, inflamatory or otherwise note-worthy. One of the people who work under me was called into our boss to explain why she posted "TGIF"...the boss felt that such a comment indicated that the employee was not grateful for her job.

I like my company, but things like this make me think about moving on sometimes.

lark

(23,155 posts)
27. This is why I have no "friends" on FB from work
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 02:31 PM
Mar 2012

Think it's just safer that way. Not aware of any searches being done by my co., but why take a chance?

lol

nradisic

(1,362 posts)
25. I would sue for discrimination...
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 01:42 PM
Mar 2012

If an employer asked me for anything strictly personal, I would sue for discrimination. It's none of the God damned business what I do on Facebook or my free time...you have to be fucking kidding me?

Lex

(34,108 posts)
28. What would the discrimination be?
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 02:39 PM
Mar 2012

If they asked everyone to disclose the information . . . where's the discrimination?

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
35. I'd go for conspiracy to coerse information under duress
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 04:20 PM
Mar 2012

or some legal gordian knot rhetoric like that.

 

just1voice

(1,362 posts)
33. LOL, after Facebook's long history of spying on "customers"
Fri Mar 23, 2012, 03:44 PM
Mar 2012

Facebook's idea of "the right thing to do" is whatever suits them, not their customers.

Monk06

(7,675 posts)
44. Facebook is only compaining because it views password sharing as data mining. They
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 12:59 AM
Mar 2012

own your personal information and they are not about to allow you
to share it with anybody.

snot

(10,538 posts)
51. We need a Constitutional right of privacy.
Sat Mar 24, 2012, 08:26 AM
Mar 2012

We sort of have one, but only inferred from the other rights; so it's esp. vague, and has been chipped away during the last couple of decades.

Like our other rights, it would of course be subject to balancing against other rights and considerations.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Facebook speaks out again...