Court Reverses E.P.A. On Big Mining Project
Source: NY Times
In a sharp rebuke, a federal judge on Friday reversed a decision by the Environmental Protection Agency to revoke a critical permit for one of the nations largest mountaintop removal mining projects.
The United States District Court judge, Amy Berman Jackson, said that the E.P.A.s unilateral decision in January 2011 to rescind the waste disposal permit for the Spruce No. 1 mine in Logan County, W.Va., exceeded the agencys authority and violated federal law. She declared that the permit was now valid, paving the way for a large and long-disputed mining project covering 2,278 acres to go forward.
In taking the rare step of revoking the mining permit, originally granted in 2007 by the Bush administration, the E.P.A. said that the mining operations would have done unacceptable damage to rivers, wildlife and communities. The mine, owned by Arch Coal of St. Louis, would have buried hundreds of miles of streams under millions of tons of residue.
The agency said at the time it was using its authority under the Clean Water Act to rescind a legally issued permit, an action it had taken only twice in the past 40 years and never before for a coal mine.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/24/science/earth/court-reverses-epa-saying-big-mining-project-can-proceed.html
Jackson is an Obama nominee who's served since 2011. And that Other Forum is already slobbering over her.
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)Mining disaster capitol of the USA, "We will try not to kill everybody this time"
Bang, Bang, Bang....Permission Granted. In Other Backwood News, Moonshine is
Safe for human consumption , " 1 out of 2 possums die" so the EPA is way off base.
alp227
(32,067 posts)GreydeeThos
(958 posts)Bushs two appointments sealed rightwing control extending the adverse affects of the worst President in history well past his time in office.
melm00se
(4,997 posts)but rather a district court decision by an Obama appointee. So how is this Bush's fault?
There are plenty of things toblame on Bush without having to stretch so far.
ashling
(25,771 posts)there is little to no chance of reversing this by the Supremes.
chnoutte
(36 posts)is a corporate hack, google her.
She is typical of many of Obama judical apointees.
Perhaps she is the type of justice Obama may appoint to the SCOTUS.
That's the problem with Democratic Centrists, you don't know what you are really getting until they are elected and even then you can't really count on them to do the right thing.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)Saturday: (**sigh**)
Thank you for the link