Obama Asks Congress to Back $1 Billion Effort to Boost US Military Presence In Europe
Source: Associated Press via Huffington Post
WARSAW, Poland (AP) President Barack Obama announced Tuesday that the United States plans to boost its military presence in Europe as tensions simmer in the region over Russia's actions in Ukraine.
Standing next to Polish President Bronislaw Komorowski, Obama said the U.S. would rotate more American troops into the region and called on Congress to provide up to $1 billion to support the effort.
"Under this effort, and with the support of Congress, the United States will preposition more equipment in Europe," Obama said at Warsaw's Belweder Palace.
If approved, the funding will be used to increase military exercises and training missions on the continent, as well as rotations of air and ground forces, the White House said. Officials said Obama was also seeking to ramp up U.S. Navy participation in NATO deployments in the Black and Baltic Seas, plus working to boost the military capacity of non-NATO countries that sit on Russia's border, including Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/03/obama-in-europe_n_5436146.html
Attention Congress! Just Say No! Give the American taxpayers a break.
A billion dollars would be far better spent creating jobs for Americans to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure - highways, bridges, etc.
I thought Obama just gave a speech backing off from the US policing the world.
ctsnowman
(1,903 posts)bowens43
(16,064 posts)Hopefully congress will tell Obama to shove it....
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)There are literally thousands of other reasons that you should already know about.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)The post I responded to. It doesn't get much clearer than that.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)just NOT voting for a/the Democrat ... an equally bad and naively myopic choice.
indepat
(20,899 posts)whatthehey
(3,660 posts)is a tad less important than the SCOTUS, employment gains rather than losses, market gains rather than losses, improving rather than retarding equal rights, and improving rather than retarding civil rights.
Or had you really not forgotten those things?
unhappycamper
(60,364 posts)Where's Obama going to find one billion dollars lying around?
Hint: It ain't blue.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)And a growing beast needs more the bigger he gets...so he needs a bigger share or the pie.
GeorgeGist
(25,320 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)[center]The U.S. Federal Reserve Bank Washington, DC*
[/center]
* A subsidiary of JP Morgan-Chase, et. al.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)is more money!
Hotler
(11,420 posts)Start making all Americans pay a war tax and this shit will stop. Oh! Bring back the draft.
Proud Public Servant
(2,097 posts)That our Afghan follies are costing us $2 billion a WEEK. So in the wake of the drawdown I say we compromise: $1 billion to the millitary, $99 billion to domestic education and infrastructure.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)What the Repukes will propose is to offset the $1B for more war with cuts to domestic needs. The Dems will agree, and Big Media will cheer the "bipartisan success".
riqster
(13,986 posts)It's an election year, after all.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Pelosi: We will agree to this emergency request and vote for the military stipend only if the Republicans and the president agree to 100 billion in infrastructure spending. Otherwise the Ukraine will have to hold a bake sale.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)I like it.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)It is classic flim flam man stuff...bait and switch, triangulation, misdirection...they use them all.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... just what is it the defense budget is defending?
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)This may be the bigger sucker of them all. 57% of the budget goes to the military who cannot even account for the money it is given. How stupid can the administration get?
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)And spend our money here where it's needed most. If the bear wanders into NATO territory, then consider playing Rambo.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)said the naysayers. Nuland was just there handing out cookies after McCain posed for photo-op with the far right fringe Nazi Party in Ukraine before the Coup/Junta/Take Over of their Parliament.
Now Obama will be there in Ukraine just as a friendly visit. Maybe some cash offers with more cookies to pass around. Its very hard not to be cynical.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)Obama proposes cuts to the military budget by a third. Decides to wage peace by feeding the world and eliminating poverty... Tells the Pentagon, "you'll still be spending five times what the Russians are spending so figure it out bitches!
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)so this is 1/5th of one percent of their above-board rake for this year. And they really can't finance this folly with what they already have?
tclambert
(11,085 posts)Pretending to be our allies for so many decades. That's how they set you up.
Plus, we gotta protect West Germany from a Soviet invasion.
FairWinds
(1,717 posts)Is over $ 1.2 TRILLION per year. Lower figures are the result of
dishonest accounting. Veterans health care, for example, is counted
as safety net spending, not military.
Seriously folks, as Eisenhower warned, the militarists are
bankrupting the country.
And you will note that there are close to zero non-militarists
commenting in the media - if there were there would be a
discussion of a de-militarized zone in Central Europe, an idea that
has been kicked around for years, but it anathema to want
to solve all problems with military force or the threat of it.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Classic Obama.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)We have always been at war with Eurasia.
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
2+2=5.
It's a carnival of Doublespeak.
1000words
(7,051 posts)Another "progressive" credential to add to "The List."
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)A skilled progressive president would get something for this. Like money for roads. Let's see if Pelosi gets something
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Enough of this belligerence and imperialism.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)The White House unveiled plans for a $1bn initiative to send more of its military to Europe on a temporary basis but stopped short of promising to increase its permanent presence, as some of Washington's allies are seeking. It said the US would review its presence on the continent.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/03/obama-ukraine-military-assurances-eastern-europe
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...so we won't have to fight them over here.
- Because if they get over here, they're afraid we'll join them.
K&R
[center]
''Would someone please check my birth certificate.
Maybe there's a loophole in there or something....''[/center]
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)I feel there are better ways to spend that money in the USA.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)Can someone please explain to me why the 40-odd nations of Europe need the United States to defend them from a single nation (Russia) with a population of 144 million people? Is Europe really that incapable of defending itself from a nation with a population four times SMALLER than the rest of the European nations? Europe has double our population and a GDP to match the U.S., so why is it that AMERICAN children have to suffer in inferior schools while their parents drive to work on crumbling roadways to afford their substandard healthcare and avoid starvation, so that the Pentagon can have a big enough budget to defend Europe from aggression?
We are not the worlds policemen.
Billy Budd
(310 posts)Its a Military Industrial Empire...it is just as evil as any other Empire....,
americannightmare
(322 posts)insist on being so schizophrenic when it comes to policy??? Now is the time to go "Bulworth" on us, Barack!
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)But seems to be completely lacking in a mission, or a soul, if you will. He's for stricter carbon standards, and for fracking. He's for major reduction in our overseas involvement, and now wants more money for the Ukraine.
He seems to want to straddle every issue. This is no way to rescue the country from the republicans
merrily
(45,251 posts)and every which way.
That is one of the reasons why I don't start applauding every time he makes a speech that sounds good. I prefer to wait to see what actually transpires.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)same gameplan as Social Security: give well-applauded speech on how the GOP will destroy it, then *quietly* do *almost* everything you were accusing them of doing to SS
not EVERYONE has to be fooled into ignoring actions over words for just enough length of time, or get snookered by the libidnous afterglow brought on by simple rhetoric: these speeches are just written to buy time to fatten the Fat Cats
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)and declaring him the most liberal president in history. I hope this post doesn't make me a racist
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)As someone in this thread noted, it's the "Third Way". Talk like a Dem, act like a MIC puppet. I'm sure "the list" will soon contain, "Proposed most anti-war foreign policy doctrine in decades"
Well, it is what it is - very few indies, newbies, and "hope"ful voters are going to show up to vote with us in November. And the BOGers won't be able to say they weren't warned.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Many more people heard it than will see this.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)former9thward
(31,997 posts)Even if Congress did that I would hope they vote NO on this request. Stop military adventurism all over the world and stop aiding militarily a region that is economically in as good as shape as we are and can afford their own protection (against who???). China, this century's next great superpower will invade economically not militarily.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)antiGOPin294
(53 posts)I am so tired of our country acting like it's the world police, especially since we have so many problems to take care of at home. Enough is enough. It's time to bring our troops back home, and let Europe deal with its own problems.