We Europeans, Canadians, Russians and Chinese prefer having that to ourselves.

so not exactly a good comparison . . .

Then again, we're not even supposed to travel to Cuba, because freedom.

will be offering "non-lethal aid" to the racist elites in Venezuela who can't win an election the fair way and choose violent revolution instead. If that fails, they'll just send in the military to escort Maduro out of the country the way the US did Aristide in Haiti (who ended up in the Central African Republic).

Why is the US so against democracy abroad and why do so many Democrats support this hypocrisy?

war and militarism when there is a Democrat in the White House - it's all political and not based in moral certainty at all.

If Bush were doing the things Obama is doing, these same people would be speaking out against it, but since there are elections in November and the most important thing for them is having some political advantage at the polls, they forget about right and wrong in favor of political expediency.

"According to the US Department of State, demonstrations and counter-demonstrations are likely to,, lcontinue"

Since they organize and fund most of the anti-government demos, they can make that prediction with some certainty.

Published on Wednesday, June 4, 2014 by The Hill

Lawmakers Push Back Against Administration’s Failed Latin America Policy
by Mark Weisbrot

In a remarkable eruption of sanity in Washington, there is finally some pushback from Congress against the far-right and “center” on U.S. policy toward Venezuela and Latin America -- something that has not happened under the McCarthyite pall that has prevailed for years.

A letter from members of Congress to President Obama last Tuesday expressed strong opposition to legislation that will impose economic sanctions against Venezuelan officials. In an election year in which there is nothing for politicians to gain from standing up to the bullies of the recently merged anti-Cuba and anti-Venezuela lobbies, this is significant. But even more striking were some of the points that the letter made about U.S. policy in the region.

The members of Congress noted that the U.S. government typically “takes European or African governments’ opinions into account in those regions,” and put forth the proposition that it should do the same for Latin America. Now this might seem like a no-brainer, but the White House and State Department routinely take decisions and actions on regional issues without any consultation whatsoever with other governments. Secretary of State John Kerry’s initial decision to not recognize last year’s presidential election results in Venezuela – which he later reversed under pressure from South America – comes to mind as an example. The U.S. government’s numerous actions in support of the 2009 coup government in Honduras – which were vehemently opposed in the region – are another example of unilateral actions that caused much resentment in the hemisphere.

In a move sure to infuriate the right, the letter also called for the Obama administration to accept Venezuela’s ambassador, and to appoint one for Venezuela. The members of Congress also noted:

"The Union of South American Nations (UNASUR), the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), and the Organization of American States (by a 29-3 vote) have all issued statements that are in various ways supportive of the Venezuelan government and that call for the respect of the country’s democratic institutions. A number of presidents and governments, including Michelle Bachelet of Chile, have publicly warned against attempts to forcibly remove the democratically elected government of Venezuela."

How's that chavista revolution working out?

It is not like VZ can sell to anyone else.

and do. China comes to mind.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-30/venezuela-oil-sales-to-u-s-at-1985-low-shows-china-cost.html

To recap your link:

1. America is buying less VZ oil as domestic supplies skyrocket.

2. VZ is netting less money selling crude to China as they pay pack massive loans they received from China.

Sound right to you?