'Conclusive Link' Between Fracking, Aquifer Contamination Found in Texas
Source: Common Dreams
Published on Friday, June 6, 2014 by Common Dreams
'Conclusive Link' Between Fracking, Aquifer Contamination Found in Texas
Scientists say water samples from Texas man's well show identical chemical signatures from nearby gas drilling operations
- Jon Queally, staff writer
Independent scientists who have reviewed a water analysis conducted by state authorities of a Texas resident's drinking well say the chemical signatures found in the water may provide "the nation's first conclusive link" between fracking operations and aquifer contamination.
Though a state investigationconducted by the Texas Railroad Commission in response to an official complaint filed by landowner and Parker County resident Steve Lipskysaid it found the chemical analysis of the water inconclusive, experts shown the results say the commission was simply wrong. "And not just by a little," reports local ABC-affiliate WFAA News who shared the results with several scientists, "but by a lot."
Lipsky said he has long believed that nearby hydraulic fracturing by the Barnett Shale company was to blame for the increasing amounts of methane and other chemicals in his drinking water. Since 2010, he says, growing amounts of methane have been seeping into the groundwater beneath his land - enough of it so that he can literally light the water coming out of his well on fire.
Barnett says there is no connection between the methane in Lipsky's well and their drilling, but scientists shown the results from the water analysisspecifically one called an isotopic analysissay the chemical composition shows they are an exact match to the gas being fracked at two nearby drilling sitescalled Butler and the Tealoperated by Barnett.
Read more: https://www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/06/06-1
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)I shudder to think of how bad it could get without the ones we have now.
Good night Judy! Thanks for all you do.
TexasTowelie
(112,150 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/107818389
HOUSTON The amount of explosive gas tainting a North Texas neighborhood's water supply has increased in recent years, but the state's oil and gas regulator says it can't link the methane to drilling activity nearby, according to a report it released Wednesday.
The state Railroad Commission has found that the contamination has gotten worse in most of the private water wells it tested in September 2013 compared with what was measured in 2010 and in 2011. However, Peter Pope, the agency geologist who signed off on the report, wrote that staff "has determined that the evidence is insufficient to conclude that Barnett Shale production activities have caused or contributed to methane contamination beneath the neighborhood."
The agency will not investigate further, Pope added in the report dated Friday. He suggested that infuriated residents of the subdivision in Weatherford, a suburb about 30 miles west of Fort Worth, "properly ventilate and aerate their water systems."
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I wonder how much "self-regulation" by the industry plays into this.
GeorgeGist
(25,320 posts)Railroad
8. Informal. to push hastily through a legislature so that there is not time enough for objections to be considered.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/railroad
kentauros
(29,414 posts)You might want to read up on it instead of looking at one single (and unrelated) definition in the dictionary
Established by the Texas Legislature in 1891, it is the state's oldest regulatory agency and began as part of the Efficiency Movement of the Progressive Era. From the 1930s to the 1960s it largely set world oil prices, but was displaced by OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries) after 1973. In 1984, the federal government took over transportation regulation for railroads, trucking and buses, but the Railroad Commission kept its name. With an annual budget of $79 million, it now focuses entirely on oil, gas, mining, propane, and pipelines, setting allocations for production each month.
Although it is only a state agency, the Texas Railroad Commission has been historically one of the most important regulatory bodies in the nation. This is because for much of the twentieth century it has strongly influenced the supply and price of oil and natural gas throughout the United States. As its name implies, the commission was originally established to oversee railroads. Riding a wave of Populist-style resentment of the railroads, James S. Hogg won the governorship in 1890 largely on his promise to have them regulated. The state constitution had been simultaneously amended to allow such a body, and in 1891 the legislature established the commission, giving it jurisdiction over rates and operations of railroads, terminals, wharves, and express companies. Governor Hogg's first appointments were John H. Reagan (chairman), Judge William Pinckney McLean, and Lafayette L. Foster. In 1894 the legislature made the agency elective, the three commissioners henceforth serving six-year, overlapping terms in Austin.
(more at the link, and it's a well-researched article)
BlueCollar
(3,859 posts)kentauros
(29,414 posts)However, many members on DU love to "rail" at those of us that live in Texas, so I was offering two sources of information giving a far better idea of what the Railroad Commission regulates than the "ironic" definition given. Accuracy is more important than weak iron(y).
BlueCollar
(3,859 posts)Right on top of the Barnett
valerief
(53,235 posts)El Shaman
(583 posts)how far the oil and gas boys got their hands up the, Texas GOPtea , puppet's asses!!!
El Shaman
(583 posts)frackers is a gonna kill us all!!!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)It's not like we need to re-invent the wheel here, This is well-paid willful ignorance. They all know what they're doing wrong. But they are paid to not understand an damned thing. I hope this jury verdict will help stop this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025030578
Bigmack
(8,020 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)"Scientific advisory panels at the Department of Energy and the EPA have enumerated ways the industry could improve and have called for modest steps, such as establishing maximum contaminant levels allowed in water for all the chemicals used in fracking. Unfortunately, these recommendations do not address the biggest loophole of all. In 2005 Congressat the behest of then Vice President Dick Cheney, a former CEO of gas driller Halliburtonexempted fracking from regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Congress needs to close this so-called Halliburton loophole, as a bill co-sponsored by New York State Representative Maurice Hinchey would do. The FRAC Act would also mandate public disclosure of all chemicals used in fracking across the nation."
-- Scientific American, Nov. 2011, "Safety First, Fracking Second"
Uncle Joe
(58,355 posts)Thanks for the thread, Judi Lynn.