Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,527 posts)
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:21 AM Jun 2014

'Conclusive Link' Between Fracking, Aquifer Contamination Found in Texas

Source: Common Dreams

Published on Friday, June 6, 2014 by Common Dreams

'Conclusive Link' Between Fracking, Aquifer Contamination Found in Texas

Scientists say water samples from Texas man's well show identical chemical signatures from nearby gas drilling operations

- Jon Queally, staff writer

Independent scientists who have reviewed a water analysis conducted by state authorities of a Texas resident's drinking well say the chemical signatures found in the water may provide "the nation's first conclusive link" between fracking operations and aquifer contamination.

Though a state investigation—conducted by the Texas Railroad Commission in response to an official complaint filed by landowner and Parker County resident Steve Lipsky—said it found the chemical analysis of the water inconclusive, experts shown the results say the commission was simply wrong. "And not just by a little," reports local ABC-affiliate WFAA News who shared the results with several scientists, "but by a lot."

Lipsky said he has long believed that nearby hydraulic fracturing by the Barnett Shale company was to blame for the increasing amounts of methane and other chemicals in his drinking water. Since 2010, he says, growing amounts of methane have been seeping into the groundwater beneath his land - enough of it so that he can literally light the water coming out of his well on fire.

Barnett says there is no connection between the methane in Lipsky's well and their drilling, but scientists shown the results from the water analysis—specifically one called an isotopic analysis—say the chemical composition shows they are an exact match to the gas being fracked at two nearby drilling sites—called Butler and the Teal—operated by Barnett.


Read more: https://www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/06/06-1

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Conclusive Link' Between Fracking, Aquifer Contamination Found in Texas (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jun 2014 OP
They poison us, cause earthquakes, and it's those damn regulations that are the real problem. Mnemosyne Jun 2014 #1
Here is a related article: TexasTowelie Jun 2014 #2
Grr sakabatou Jun 2014 #14
POISON blkmusclmachine Jun 2014 #3
How much teeth does the report have and will anything actually come of it? davidpdx Jun 2014 #4
Railroad Commission? GeorgeGist Jun 2014 #5
Yes, "Railroad Commission of Texas" kentauros Jun 2014 #6
I think you missed the irony...n/t BlueCollar Jun 2014 #7
Not at all. kentauros Jun 2014 #8
i live in texas also BlueCollar Jun 2014 #13
So will Texas do what Jindal did, making suing gas and oil cos illegal? nt valerief Jun 2014 #9
Depends on El Shaman Jun 2014 #11
The Tali El Shaman Jun 2014 #10
Oh, hell, a hundred years ago my family's water was destroyed by oil company drilling. freshwest Jun 2014 #12
TOTALLY agree NT Bigmack Jun 2014 #15
Why would the government allow them to hurt us? Octafish Jun 2014 #16
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #17

Mnemosyne

(21,363 posts)
1. They poison us, cause earthquakes, and it's those damn regulations that are the real problem.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:30 AM
Jun 2014

I shudder to think of how bad it could get without the ones we have now.

Good night Judy! Thanks for all you do.

TexasTowelie

(112,150 posts)
2. Here is a related article:
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 03:51 AM
Jun 2014
Texas: Can't tie water contamination to drilling
http://www.democraticunderground.com/107818389

HOUSTON — The amount of explosive gas tainting a North Texas neighborhood's water supply has increased in recent years, but the state's oil and gas regulator says it can't link the methane to drilling activity nearby, according to a report it released Wednesday.

The state Railroad Commission has found that the contamination has gotten worse in most of the private water wells it tested in September 2013 compared with what was measured in 2010 and in 2011. However, Peter Pope, the agency geologist who signed off on the report, wrote that staff "has determined that the evidence is insufficient to conclude that Barnett Shale production activities have caused or contributed to methane contamination beneath the neighborhood."

The agency will not investigate further, Pope added in the report dated Friday. He suggested that infuriated residents of the subdivision in Weatherford, a suburb about 30 miles west of Fort Worth, "properly ventilate and aerate their water systems."

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
4. How much teeth does the report have and will anything actually come of it?
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:37 AM
Jun 2014

I wonder how much "self-regulation" by the industry plays into this.

GeorgeGist

(25,320 posts)
5. Railroad Commission?
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 07:59 AM
Jun 2014

Railroad
8. Informal. to push hastily through a legislature so that there is not time enough for objections to be considered.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/railroad

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
6. Yes, "Railroad Commission of Texas"
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:51 AM
Jun 2014

You might want to read up on it instead of looking at one single (and unrelated) definition in the dictionary

Railroad Commission of Texas (Wikipedia)

Established by the Texas Legislature in 1891, it is the state's oldest regulatory agency and began as part of the Efficiency Movement of the Progressive Era. From the 1930s to the 1960s it largely set world oil prices, but was displaced by OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries) after 1973. In 1984, the federal government took over transportation regulation for railroads, trucking and buses, but the Railroad Commission kept its name. With an annual budget of $79 million, it now focuses entirely on oil, gas, mining, propane, and pipelines, setting allocations for production each month.


Railroad Commission - The Handbook of Texas Online | Texas State Historical Association

Although it is only a state agency, the Texas Railroad Commission has been historically one of the most important regulatory bodies in the nation. This is because for much of the twentieth century it has strongly influenced the supply and price of oil and natural gas throughout the United States. As its name implies, the commission was originally established to oversee railroads. Riding a wave of Populist-style resentment of the railroads, James S. Hogg won the governorship in 1890 largely on his promise to have them regulated. The state constitution had been simultaneously amended to allow such a body, and in 1891 the legislature established the commission, giving it jurisdiction over rates and operations of railroads, terminals, wharves, and express companies. Governor Hogg's first appointments were John H. Reagan (chairman), Judge William Pinckney McLean, and Lafayette L. Foster. In 1894 the legislature made the agency elective, the three commissioners henceforth serving six-year, overlapping terms in Austin.

(more at the link, and it's a well-researched article)

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
8. Not at all.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 09:06 AM
Jun 2014

However, many members on DU love to "rail" at those of us that live in Texas, so I was offering two sources of information giving a far better idea of what the Railroad Commission regulates than the "ironic" definition given. Accuracy is more important than weak iron(y).

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
12. Oh, hell, a hundred years ago my family's water was destroyed by oil company drilling.
Sat Jun 7, 2014, 08:12 PM
Jun 2014

It's not like we need to re-invent the wheel here, This is well-paid willful ignorance. They all know what they're doing wrong. But they are paid to not understand an damned thing. I hope this jury verdict will help stop this:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025030578

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
16. Why would the government allow them to hurt us?
Sun Jun 8, 2014, 05:12 PM
Jun 2014
Because Cheney asked them to.

"Scientific advisory panels at the Department of Energy and the EPA have enumerated ways the industry could improve and have called for modest steps, such as establishing maximum contaminant levels allowed in water for all the chemicals used in fracking. Unfortunately, these recommendations do not address the biggest loophole of all. In 2005 Congress—at the behest of then Vice President Dick Cheney, a former CEO of gas driller Halliburton—exempted fracking from regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Congress needs to close this so-called Halliburton loophole, as a bill co-sponsored by New York State Representative Maurice Hinchey would do. The FRAC Act would also mandate public disclosure of all chemicals used in fracking across the nation."

-- Scientific American, Nov. 2011, "Safety First, Fracking Second"
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Conclusive Link' Between...