Court Strikes Down Okla.'s Ultrasound Abortion Law
Source: NPR
An Oklahoma judge on Wednesday struck down a state law requiring women seeking abortions to have an ultrasound image placed in front of them and to listen to a detailed description of the fetus before the procedure.
District Judge Bryan Dixon ruled the statute passed by the Legislature in 2010 is an unconstitutional special law because it addresses only patients, physicians and sonographers dealing with abortions and does not address them concerning other medical care.
Former Democratic Gov. Brad Henry had vetoed the bill after it passed the state's Republican-controlled Legislature, warning at the time that the measure likely would lead to a "potential futile legal battle." Republicans managed to override the veto with the help of several anti-abortion Democrats.
But enforcement has been blocked since May 2010 when the Center for Reproductive Rights in New York challenged the law on behalf of Nova Health Systems, operator of Reproductive Services of Tulsa, and Dr. Larry Burns, who the group said provides abortions in Norman.
Read more: http://www.npr.org/2012/03/28/149565177/court-strikes-down-okla-s-ultrasound-abortion-law?ft=1&f=1001
Thank you, for that Judge in Oklahoma who is rational......
secondwind
(16,903 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)MindMover
(5,016 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)ridiculous place in the 21st century.
PlanetBev
(4,104 posts)For the moment. It's almost a minute to minute battle in these insane times.
aquamarina
(1,865 posts)xchrom
(108,903 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Nt
BB_Troll
(65 posts)Maybe the OK Legislature should have chosen to use funds to set up an Ultrasound station near each Reproductive Rights provider so that the women have the choice to get more information about the fetus.
KatyaR
(3,445 posts)It's pretty much a given at this point that we will have a personhood amendment on the ballot in November. Even the State Medical Association is against it, because they're afraid it will criminalize in-vitro fertilization, etc., as well as birth control and the morning after pill.
Between all this and the Governor and the Legislature trying to eliminate the state income tax, everyone in Oklahoma is under attack right now--unless you're a billionaire.
Uncle Joe
(58,445 posts)Thanks for the thread, MindMover.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)It wouldn't have passed the smell test, either.
We're winning the GOP's war on women.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)MindMover
(5,016 posts)Why the Hell not in Texas?
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Brettongarcia
(2,262 posts)We need some women in Texas to bring lawsuits against the state of Texas, and Rick Perry, in the next few months. For rape.
More and more people, even in Texas, are calling the inserted, trans-vaginal sonogram, "rape with a foreign object," under duress. If a woman does not want such a thing, it is legally rape.
Unfortunately, the law has passed one appeal to - a southern - Federal appeals court in Louisiana. But with luck? A really devatating lawsuit or appeal will surface in a few months; just in time to impact the election. With highly-publicized statements to the effect that Texas, Rick Perry, and the Republican Party, are literally guilty of rape: the "legally" coerced insertion of a foreign object into the sexual organ of an unwilling woman.
Doonsbury lampooned this a week or two ago; but it's not funny. I'm hoping someone comes forward in the next month or two, and makes a serious case of it.
If you are a woman getting an abortion in the state of Texas in the next month or two or three? Consider going to the Democratic Party; and letting them know you want to make a legal case out of it. Tell them you are unwilling; the waiver is coerced. And therefore? It is rape. And you want to take Texas to court.
cstanleytech
(26,332 posts)could learn alot from this judge if they would just pull their heads out of their ass.
EC
(12,287 posts)this is just to get to the Supremes...that is what all these laws are about, having the Supremes tear down Roe v Wade. The court is finally in their favor and they are salivating at getting to court where they can overturn Roe v Wade...just watch.
MindMover
(5,016 posts)rocktivity
(44,580 posts)Texas and Pennsylvania, you're next!
rocktivity
MindMover
(5,016 posts)CBHagman
(16,990 posts)...and the freak show that is going on there.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)uppityperson
(115,681 posts)eallen
(2,955 posts)The US's?
Or Oklahoma's?
From the reasoning, I suspect the latter. The article didn't make that clear.
BlueIris
(29,135 posts)Bandit
(21,475 posts)This mandate is far more severe and intrusive than the one requiring everyone be a part of the Health Insurance solution.