Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 06:13 PM Mar 2012

Court Strikes Down Okla.'s Ultrasound Abortion Law

Source: NPR

An Oklahoma judge on Wednesday struck down a state law requiring women seeking abortions to have an ultrasound image placed in front of them and to listen to a detailed description of the fetus before the procedure.

District Judge Bryan Dixon ruled the statute passed by the Legislature in 2010 is an unconstitutional special law because it addresses only patients, physicians and sonographers dealing with abortions and does not address them concerning other medical care.

Former Democratic Gov. Brad Henry had vetoed the bill after it passed the state's Republican-controlled Legislature, warning at the time that the measure likely would lead to a "potential futile legal battle." Republicans managed to override the veto with the help of several anti-abortion Democrats.

But enforcement has been blocked since May 2010 when the Center for Reproductive Rights in New York challenged the law on behalf of Nova Health Systems, operator of Reproductive Services of Tulsa, and Dr. Larry Burns, who the group said provides abortions in Norman.

Read more: http://www.npr.org/2012/03/28/149565177/court-strikes-down-okla-s-ultrasound-abortion-law?ft=1&f=1001



Thank you, for that Judge in Oklahoma who is rational......
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court Strikes Down Okla.'s Ultrasound Abortion Law (Original Post) MindMover Mar 2012 OP
Glad the women in OK can make their own choices without harrassment now. secondwind Mar 2012 #1
A breath of sanity for a change. Very very rare these days. n/t RKP5637 Mar 2012 #2
Hopefully more sanity to come...... MindMover Mar 2012 #4
I hope so. If the nuttiness continues in this country, it's going to be a pretty lackluster RKP5637 Mar 2012 #7
Sanity prevails again PlanetBev Mar 2012 #3
Damn activist judges aquamarina Mar 2012 #5
Du rec. Nt xchrom Mar 2012 #6
nobody is safe with this supreme court arely staircase Mar 2012 #8
Glad the State cannot harass the women/girls now... BB_Troll Mar 2012 #9
Oh, it's not over by a long shot. KatyaR Mar 2012 #16
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #10
This must be why the Idaho GOP shitcanned their law on Monday. Major Hogwash Mar 2012 #11
Why the hell not in Texas? freshwest Mar 2012 #12
That is a good question and a Post title.... MindMover Mar 2012 #13
Something up with the courts there, I guess. freshwest Mar 2012 #14
They're slow here in Texas: Rick Perry is our gov. But if a woman getting an abort, wants to help? Brettongarcia Mar 2012 #26
A good decision by the judge ino. The 5 idiots on SCOTUS cstanleytech Mar 2012 #15
Of course they did EC Mar 2012 #17
If that ever even came close to happening, you will see District 12 in outright revolution..... MindMover Mar 2012 #18
CUE THE VONAGE THEME! rocktivity Mar 2012 #19
I sincerely hope you are correct..... MindMover Mar 2012 #20
And don't forget Virginia... CBHagman Mar 2012 #21
thank goodness. there is hope for all of us with this ruling. :) roguevalley Mar 2012 #22
k&r. Good, as it should have. eom uppityperson Mar 2012 #23
That article is badly written -- it violates WHICH constitution? eallen Mar 2012 #24
Thank you, Sanity. nt BlueIris Mar 2012 #25
Send it to the Extreme Court and we will see how they feel about Government Mandates... Bandit Mar 2012 #27

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
7. I hope so. If the nuttiness continues in this country, it's going to be a pretty lackluster
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 06:31 PM
Mar 2012

ridiculous place in the 21st century.

BB_Troll

(65 posts)
9. Glad the State cannot harass the women/girls now...
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 06:46 PM
Mar 2012

Maybe the OK Legislature should have chosen to use funds to set up an Ultrasound station near each Reproductive Rights provider so that the women have the choice to get more information about the fetus.

KatyaR

(3,445 posts)
16. Oh, it's not over by a long shot.
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 08:19 PM
Mar 2012

It's pretty much a given at this point that we will have a personhood amendment on the ballot in November. Even the State Medical Association is against it, because they're afraid it will criminalize in-vitro fertilization, etc., as well as birth control and the morning after pill.

Between all this and the Governor and the Legislature trying to eliminate the state income tax, everyone in Oklahoma is under attack right now--unless you're a billionaire.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
11. This must be why the Idaho GOP shitcanned their law on Monday.
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 06:53 PM
Mar 2012

It wouldn't have passed the smell test, either.

We're winning the GOP's war on women.

Brettongarcia

(2,262 posts)
26. They're slow here in Texas: Rick Perry is our gov. But if a woman getting an abort, wants to help?
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 05:59 PM
Mar 2012

We need some women in Texas to bring lawsuits against the state of Texas, and Rick Perry, in the next few months. For rape.

More and more people, even in Texas, are calling the inserted, trans-vaginal sonogram, "rape with a foreign object," under duress. If a woman does not want such a thing, it is legally rape.

Unfortunately, the law has passed one appeal to - a southern - Federal appeals court in Louisiana. But with luck? A really devatating lawsuit or appeal will surface in a few months; just in time to impact the election. With highly-publicized statements to the effect that Texas, Rick Perry, and the Republican Party, are literally guilty of rape: the "legally" coerced insertion of a foreign object into the sexual organ of an unwilling woman.

Doonsbury lampooned this a week or two ago; but it's not funny. I'm hoping someone comes forward in the next month or two, and makes a serious case of it.

If you are a woman getting an abortion in the state of Texas in the next month or two or three? Consider going to the Democratic Party; and letting them know you want to make a legal case out of it. Tell them you are unwilling; the waiver is coerced. And therefore? It is rape. And you want to take Texas to court.

cstanleytech

(26,332 posts)
15. A good decision by the judge ino. The 5 idiots on SCOTUS
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 07:47 PM
Mar 2012

could learn alot from this judge if they would just pull their heads out of their ass.

EC

(12,287 posts)
17. Of course they did
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 08:54 PM
Mar 2012

this is just to get to the Supremes...that is what all these laws are about, having the Supremes tear down Roe v Wade. The court is finally in their favor and they are salivating at getting to court where they can overturn Roe v Wade...just watch.

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
18. If that ever even came close to happening, you will see District 12 in outright revolution.....
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 08:57 PM
Mar 2012

eallen

(2,955 posts)
24. That article is badly written -- it violates WHICH constitution?
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 04:25 PM
Mar 2012

The US's?

Or Oklahoma's?

From the reasoning, I suspect the latter. The article didn't make that clear.


Bandit

(21,475 posts)
27. Send it to the Extreme Court and we will see how they feel about Government Mandates...
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 06:37 PM
Mar 2012

This mandate is far more severe and intrusive than the one requiring everyone be a part of the Health Insurance solution.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court Strikes Down Okla.'...