Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 10:16 PM Mar 2012

APNewsBreak: New security for US troops

Source: AP

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. military commanders in Afghanistan have assigned "guardian angels" — troops that watch over their comrades even as they sleep — and have ordered a series of other increased security measures to protect troops against possible attacks by rogue Afghans.

The added protections are part of a directive issued in recent weeks by Marine Gen. John Allen, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, to guard against insider threats, according to a senior military official. And they come in the wake of a spike in attacks on U.S. and coalition forces by Afghans, including the point-blank shooting deaths of two U.S. advisers in Afghanistan's Ministry of Interior.

Some of the changes have been subtle, others not so much.

In several Afghan ministries, Americans are now allowed to carry weapons. And they have been instructed to rearrange their office desks there to face the door, so they can see who is coming in, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the internal directive.

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gzbI0YVHcYbtOl0gX8PQD4OJmvcg?docId=630948f640cd49d4a2e4d94b1d677823



I'm speechless. "Rogue Afghans".
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
APNewsBreak: New security for US troops (Original Post) bemildred Mar 2012 OP
How should the Afghans react to learning that the military occupation is increasing in size? The Northerner Mar 2012 #1
Seems unlikely quakerboy Mar 2012 #2
I've got a better solution- BRING THEM HOME NOW. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #3
+1000 pinboy3niner Mar 2012 #5
Guardian Angels dogknob Mar 2012 #4
There's a difference between sentries guarding the perimeter from EXTERNAL threats... pinboy3niner Mar 2012 #6
That means you are now fucked as an army. You don't really know who to shoot. nt bemildred Mar 2012 #7
I know the answer! Nihil Mar 2012 #8
"God will know his own" I believe the phrase is. bemildred Mar 2012 #9
No way, man pinboy3niner Mar 2012 #10
Who, exactly are the "advisors" mentioned in the article? BeHereNow Mar 2012 #11
They are minders/supervisors for our Afghan minions. bemildred Mar 2012 #13
"Advisors..." BeHereNow Mar 2012 #12
Taking turns AtopTheRacismNow Mar 2012 #14

The Northerner

(5,040 posts)
1. How should the Afghans react to learning that the military occupation is increasing in size?
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 04:03 AM
Mar 2012

Perhaps withdrawing completely just might reduce the tension and bloodshed over there?

quakerboy

(13,920 posts)
2. Seems unlikely
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 04:24 AM
Mar 2012

But it certainly would reduce our ongoing participation in the tension and bloodshed over there.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
5. +1000
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 04:51 AM
Mar 2012

It's turned into Operation Enduring Occupation, with no end in sight. Even the justifications offered by the most ardent proponents of staying longer are ringing more hollow every day. And the term associated with the Vietnam War--'quagmire'--is increasingly being applied, accurately, to the war in Afghanistan.

dogknob

(2,431 posts)
4. Guardian Angels
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 04:37 AM
Mar 2012

Is that fancypants, gussied-up, PR-talk for the fact that our army now has to post sentries at night like every other fucking army does?

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
6. There's a difference between sentries guarding the perimeter from EXTERNAL threats...
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 04:59 AM
Mar 2012

...and those now being posted INSIDE the perimeter to guard against INTERNAL threats. That's not something "every other fucking army does."

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
8. I know the answer!
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 10:29 AM
Mar 2012

Use enough drone-launched missiles into the centre of the base and you're bound
to get the bad guys. Anyone else in the vicinity was obviously collaborating with
the insurgents and so deserved to be killed/maimed!

Problem solved!


pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
10. No way, man
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 11:09 AM
Mar 2012

We still have one duck to run up the flagpole--Afghianistanization! After all, it worked so well in Vietnam...

BeHereNow

(17,162 posts)
11. Who, exactly are the "advisors" mentioned in the article?
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 01:43 PM
Mar 2012

"As a result of the shootings, more than 300 advisers were pulled out of the Afghan ministries. So far, several dozen have returned, but many will not go back until additional security measures are put in place by the Afghans. That would include better vetting procedures, background checks and physical security measures at the ministries. The military official also said some advisers may not return, since commanders have determined that some may no longer be needed in the jobs."

And what is exactly is our "mission?"

"Officials insist the killings have not hampered the U.S. mission in Afghanistan. But they come at a time when new, small advisory teams are heading into Afghanistan to beef up the training program, requiring them to work closely with Afghan military units."

And WHO the hell are these anonymous "Officials" always referred to in these stories?

FUBAR, that is what it is, this cluster-fuck of a "war."

BHN

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»APNewsBreak: New security...