UK energy plans in 'tatters' after Npower and E. ON nuclear plant withdrawal
Source: The Telegraph
Britain's long-term energy policy lay "in tatters" on Thursday after two of the ''big six'' energy companies pulled out of multi-billion pound plans to develop new nuclear plants.
In a ''devastating blow'' for the Government's energy policy, RWE npower and E. ON announced they would end their joint venture to build nuclear power plants in Britain.
<snip>
Keith Allott, head of climate change at WWF-UK, said despite the government's efforts to "bend over backwards", it was "now blindingly clear that the economics just don't stack up".
<snip>
"The Government needs to wake up and smell the coffee - if it backed the renewables industry to the hilt instead of flogging the nuclear horse, then the UK could become a world leader in a sector that is already seeing massive growth."
<snip>
Read more: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/nuclearpower/9173253/UK-energy-plans-in-tatters-after-Npower-and-E.-ON-nuclear-plant-withdrawal.html
BB_Troll
(65 posts)Nuclear, fine. But where are they on Wind? I'm sure thy have plenty of that on the British Isles.
(Solar probably won't work there though.)
FBaggins
(26,744 posts)But they're at a potential crossroads in government policy.
It looks like they're cutting back on encouraging solar and changing HOW they encourage some wind power from direct support to penalizing high carbon emissions.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)FBaggins
(26,744 posts)but the implementation just isn't as advanced as offshore wind is. They're still trying to demonstrate a commercially viable design.
The UK is near the front of the wave (pun intended), but offshore wind has much more short/mid-term options.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,320 posts)Scotland 15 GW
Wales 1.5 GW
England 1.5 GW
It comments:
Scotland and Ireland have the majority of the west-facing coast.
The 2 power station sites under discussion here are in Wales and England.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,320 posts)About 40 TWh/annum available, compared with 352 TWh consumption in 2009. And if Scotland were to become independent, they'd get about 80% of the available wave power.
MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)BB_Troll
(65 posts)but will it work as an alternate power source? for something other than warming water?
MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)Like for example small scale hydro
MichaelMcGuire
(1,684 posts)Scotland's resource potential
The production of renewable energy in Scotland is an issue that has come to the fore in technical, economic, and political terms during the opening years of the 21st century.[1] The natural resource base for renewables is extraordinary by European, and even global standards. In addition to an existing installed capacity[a] of 1.3 Gigawatts (GW) of hydro-electric schemes, Scotland has an estimated potential of 36.5 GW of wind and 7.5 GW of tidal power, 25% of the estimated total capacity for the European Union and up to 14 GW of wave power potential, 10% of EU capacity.[2][3] The renewable electricity generating capacity may be 60 GW or more, considerably greater than the existing capacity from all Scottish fuel sources of 10.3 GW.[2][4] Scotland is on track to exceed its renewable energy target, set in 2007, for 31% of total power generation coming from renewables by 2011, and the 2020 target for the renewable share of total electricity generation has been raised from 50% to 80%.[5]