1 in 80 Maryland children diagnosed with autism, CDC says
Source: http://www.baltimoresun.com/health/bs-hs-autism-ca
One in 88 American children has an autism spectrum disorder, according to a new estimate from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that is 23 percent higher than one the agency released three years ago.
The data come from 14 states, including Maryland, where 1 in 80 children is estimated to have the disorder. That ranks Maryland as having the seventh most cases.
The CDC revises its estimate every few years and the rate has been steadily increasing. Since 2002, the number of children with autism has increased 78 percent.
Read more: Link to source
This is worrying. What is going on? Is this due to the environment or what?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)It's reached the point where the number and variety of conditions that are labeled autism is silly.
Not saying there aren't real autistic kids out there. But lots of people are slapping on the autistic label for a variety of reasons. And let's just say many of those reasons aren't in the interest of the child.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Didn't say that they weren't defining it. I'm saying they keep putting more and more stuff under the autism label.
"Back in my day" the kid had to be profoundly disabled to be autistic.
Then we got Aspergers Syndrome. We used to call said people "geeks" or "nerds". Now they have a medical condition.
Now being shy is enough.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Will sit and look at Vacuum Cleaners on Ebay for hours? RED ones were the favorite.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)You've almost caught up with the point I was making.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)They are high on the chart of the Autism spectrum. Not profound at all.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)Just call us geeks and nerds if that makes you more comfortable sunshine, personally I am glad to know WTF I have had such a fun fucking life.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Naming it didn't actually do a damn thing to fix our "fun fucking" lives. Nor does it actually help any qualified therapists actually help their patients.
But it does allow alarming headlines about how many autistic people there are.
1monster
(11,012 posts)quite often, some very autistic, some medium, and some mildly. Believe me, even those who are "mildly" autistic have serious problems and are not arbitrarily diagnosed as autistic. My stepson was dianosed with eleven markers for autism before he was five years old, but never diagnosed as autistic until he was 35 years old. (Although we figured it out when he was 21.) This meant that he never received the necessary therapy or help, even though we went spent years and thousands and thousands of dollars paying for phychologists, psychiatrists, therapists, and neurologists.
Today, if a child is dianosed with seven markers for autism, he/she is diagnosed with some form of autism: autism, Aspergers Syndrome Pervasive Developmental Disorder, not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS), Childhood Disintegrative Disorder (very rare), and Rett Syndrome (found almost exclusively in girls).
Just because a child dose not show the classic symptoms of autism (can't stand to be touched, screaming fits, etc., does not mean that they are not autistic. Attitudes like yours, "nerd", "geeks" really tic me off because these people really need help and they don't get it because that attitude pretends that it isn't a medical condition. And being shy isn't enough to get a diagnosis.
I need to stop, before I violate TOS.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Not the actual people who need help.
Let me just say I am extremely aware of this condition. I also do not believe they are all the same condition, and lumping them together is a disservice. Because it slows development of treatments for each of these individual problems.
The "shy" comment is a dig at some researchers who have decided that damn near anything is autistic, not the generally accepted guidelines.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)What stuff? Autism is a spectrum. It is not the case of ..'then we got Aspergers.'
I teach kids with Autism.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)In that there was no standard for it until 1994.
And those diagnoses have lead to alarming posts, like the op. Not because there are more autistic people, but because more people are labeled autistic.
That was the entirety of my point.
Crowman1979
(3,844 posts)HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Nope, none of the kids I worked with were taking any kind of meds.
aquart
(69,014 posts)But have a baby?
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)There is something environmental influencing it.
Kind of Blue
(8,709 posts)is 36, has Asperger's Syndrome and was born in Maryland. At the time, we were told how fortunate we were to have the only school started to treat autistic kids in the U.S. located in our vicinity. Luckily, at that time, she was diagnosed very quickly with a label we'd never ever heard of. But I've always wondered why Maryland. The school had a wide range of kids in the spectrum. She learned the skills taught very quickly and it became difficult for her to deal in the environment and was taken out by the time she started high school. I'll never forget one mother saying to us on graduation day from the school - for those who could graduate and those they had no more to offer - please count your blessings, H - my sister - she said, will be able to care for herself and others unlike many of our kids. Her son was a bit older and diagnosed very late. But we all knew how lucky we were and thanked goodness the school was there for anything they could do to help.
I wish I could have read the article - the link no longer exists. I'll check around to see if a similar site carries the survey.
Thanks for posting!
KT2000
(20,581 posts)by reading the environmental health research. Environmental health research is held separate from medical research so it just sits there piling up until a political atmosphere exists that allows action to be taken for the sake of preserving public health.
You can see some of the research at Environmental Health Perspectives
Silent Spring Institute
Foreign research journals - Scandinavian, Italy, Japan are good
search for health effects of pesticide chemicals, dioxin
Hormone mimicking chemicals affect the development of the brain of the fetus. So does exposure to certain pesticides.
We are in about the third decade of chemical com,panies holding off the requirement that their products be tested for the effects of hormone/endocrine mimicking.
Here is a good place to start and learn more resources: http://www.cbc.ca/documentaries/doczone/2008/disappearingmale/chemicals.html
AtopTheRacismNow
(13 posts)Or it's just where the poll occured?