Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bosonic

(3,746 posts)
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 06:47 PM Aug 2014

CDC issues emergency 'all-hands' call for Ebola response

Source: AFP

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Wednesday issued its highest alert for an all-hands on deck response to the Ebola crisis in West Africa.

"Ops Center moved to Level 1 response to given the extension to Nigeria & potential to affect many lives," CDC chief Tom Frieden said on Twitter.

Level 1 is the highest on a 1-6 scale and signals that increased staff and resources will be devoted to the outbreak.

"Basically this activation allows us to pull resources from throughout the agency to respond to this," said CDC spokesman Tom Skinner.

Read more: https://uk.news.yahoo.com/cdc-issues-emergency-hands-call-ebola-response-212611851.html#pVfAhJt

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CDC issues emergency 'all-hands' call for Ebola response (Original Post) Bosonic Aug 2014 OP
It's about time. nt. hedda_foil Aug 2014 #1
I agree laundry_queen Aug 2014 #2
Yes . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #5
The thing is laundry_queen Aug 2014 #10
Not being air-borne or highly contagious like a flu bug . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #12
Well laundry_queen Aug 2014 #15
That is some good news, about the brief period during which one is contagious. another_liberal Aug 2014 #17
Sure it did. Compare it to the 1918 flu pandemic jeff47 Aug 2014 #18
I fail to see your point . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #21
That's because you're deliberately distorting the point. jeff47 Aug 2014 #24
"The Hot Zone" is 100% true. WinkyDink Aug 2014 #22
Didn't they change the names or something? laundry_queen Aug 2014 #23
Almost. We know more now than when it was written. jeff47 Aug 2014 #25
Hope this means no casual travelers from the area without quarantine seveneyes Aug 2014 #3
Great . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #4
Before The Week Is Out, Sir The Magistrate Aug 2014 #6
Why the hell would I do a fool thing like that? another_liberal Aug 2014 #7
Past Performance, Sir, Argues For The Proposition The Magistrate Aug 2014 #8
Yeah, that is your opinion . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #9
Already, Sir, You Are Predicting They Will Lose Some Of The Stuff, And Loose It On The Land The Magistrate Aug 2014 #29
Good call. kestrel91316 Aug 2014 #27
A non sequitur. longship Aug 2014 #11
Nothing to do with Ebola per se, no . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #14
No, but I might argue that the misplaced pathogens obviously happened years ago... longship Aug 2014 #16
I am doing what? Are you serious? another_liberal Aug 2014 #20
That smallpox was probably misplaced DECADES ago by kestrel91316 Aug 2014 #28
Maybe we need Margaret Montoya! longship Aug 2014 #13
non-essential travel should be banned quadrature Aug 2014 #19
This reponse level is mostly about freeing up monetary, and staff resources. NOT infectivity. bench scientist Aug 2014 #26

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
2. I agree
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 07:03 PM
Aug 2014

I said a couple months ago that this kind of action should've happened sooner. I feel like they really dropped the ball here. They got used to Ebola outbreaks burning themselves out and became complacent.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
5. Yes . . .
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 07:42 PM
Aug 2014

Some people on these boards were telling me only about a week ago that Ebola was too difficult to transmit person to person for this outbreak to ever become a serious epidemic.

I don't see them making that argument now.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
10. The thing is
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 08:08 PM
Aug 2014

when they say that all they really mean is that it's not as contagious as the flu.

Well, thank fucking god for that, but it doesn't mean we can relax about it. If someone vomits or coughs near you, and you get a microscopic bit of fluid in your eye - you've got it. Just because it isn't HIGHLY contagious, doesn't mean it still can't infect even people who take precautions. There have been strains that seemed to transmit more readily than others and considering how quickly viruses mutate, it's shocking they don't take it more seriously.

As a funny side note, all the posters citing the CDC made me chuckle, as in the book by Richard Preston, the army thinks the CDC is WAY too arrogant and relaxed about Ebola. I know it's 'based' on a true story, but it's a recurring theme in the book. I guess time will tell who is right.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
12. Not being air-borne or highly contagious like a flu bug . . .
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 08:20 PM
Aug 2014

Sure didn't seen to slow down HIV very much when it hit the streets.

Mr. Preston must feel like a sad, sad prophet right about now.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
15. Well
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 08:28 PM
Aug 2014

That WAS because there is a highly latent period between infection and symptoms during which you can transmit it. HIV has a different 'plan' for transmission than Ebola does. Ebola is only transmitted once symptoms show up, so that works in our favor. But just because there are many 'in our favor's (not technically airborne, cannot transmit without symptoms) doesn't mean it won't spread. We are humans on a crowded planet. Ebola is a virus that cares only about surviving. It will, eventually, find a way. Imagine, if you will, Ebola Reston transmission with Ebola Zaire's death rate. The bigger and longer the outbreaks are, the more likely this is going to happen. Eventually.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
17. That is some good news, about the brief period during which one is contagious.
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 08:40 PM
Aug 2014

I also hope emergency rooms are not overwhelmed by fearful thousands with only mild cases of diarrhea and such.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
18. Sure it did. Compare it to the 1918 flu pandemic
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 08:41 PM
Aug 2014

Yes, lots and lots of people got HIV.

Lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots of people got the Spanish flu.

(And when looking at it, make sure you correct for population size)

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
21. I fail to see your point . . .
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 08:54 PM
Aug 2014

HIV/AIDS has been anything but a goddamned walk in the park. How many millions have to die early, painful deaths before you would agree it is a truly serious disease?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
24. That's because you're deliberately distorting the point.
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 09:04 PM
Aug 2014

HIV is a very serious disease that has killed millions.

Airborne HIV would be a monstrously awful disease that would kill billions. It would utterly annihilate modern society, either through what we had to do to contain it, or what it would do if we did not contain it.

That doesn't make HIV a walk in the park. It makes us lucky HIV was not worse.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
23. Didn't they change the names or something?
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 09:04 PM
Aug 2014

I just reread it but it was the PDF file and I couldn't find the disclaimer I thought I had read with the book, that the names had been changed. I *thought* the book was mostly true, but I've heard 'true stories' in books that weren't 100% true. So thanks

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
3. Hope this means no casual travelers from the area without quarantine
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 07:23 PM
Aug 2014

This needs to be stopped at its origin.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
4. Great . . .
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 07:38 PM
Aug 2014

But these are the same people who managed to lose how many vials of smallpox and anthrax, and allowed them to stay lost for how many years?

The Magistrate

(95,248 posts)
6. Before The Week Is Out, Sir
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 07:44 PM
Aug 2014

I expect you will be linking to claims the C.D.C. started it in Nigeria just to seize the oil there....

"No bottom! No bottom with this line!"

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
7. Why the hell would I do a fool thing like that?
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 07:55 PM
Aug 2014

I've said it before, but I say again, and with added emphasis: You clearly know nothing about me.

The Magistrate

(95,248 posts)
29. Already, Sir, You Are Predicting They Will Lose Some Of The Stuff, And Loose It On The Land
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 11:08 PM
Aug 2014

And that within the hour of my comment, and here in this very thread.

Of course, it is possible that you would still have the sense, or the self-control, to refrain, simply on the grounds of not giving me the gratification, but if something like that appears in Russia Times or in Consortium or Reader Supported News, you may not even so be able to restrain yourself.

longship

(40,416 posts)
11. A non sequitur.
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 08:09 PM
Aug 2014

The CDC is one of the premier centers on Ebola. They have had the virus under study since the first outbreak. However, there are only 15 BSL-4 labs in the USA and Ebola is a very tough nut to crack.

The recent smallpox vials have absolutely nothing to do with the CDC's research on Ebola.

Sheesh!

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
14. Nothing to do with Ebola per se, no . . .
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 08:27 PM
Aug 2014

But everything to do with misplacing incredibly dangerous pathogens. Are you suggesting that stunning breakdown of control is not a matter for concern?

longship

(40,416 posts)
16. No, but I might argue that the misplaced pathogens obviously happened years ago...
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 08:36 PM
Aug 2014

and has little to do with the current situation.

The CDC is one of the primary centers for studying these pathogens, arguably THE center. And they have been doing so since the very first outbreak. They know more about Ebola than anybody on the planet.

But, go ahead and poison the well. After all, we all need to be more afraid.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
20. I am doing what? Are you serious?
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 08:45 PM
Aug 2014

If my commenting on this topic on an Internet chat board is going to start some kind of mass panic, then we are already in a far worse situation that anyone (excepting yourself) has yet suggested. If that is the case, you should follow your own advice, and don't "Poison the well" yourself.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
28. That smallpox was probably misplaced DECADES ago by
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 10:43 PM
Aug 2014

someone now long dead.

But carry on with your silliness, Alex Jones.

bench scientist

(1,107 posts)
26. This reponse level is mostly about freeing up monetary, and staff resources. NOT infectivity.
Wed Aug 6, 2014, 09:31 PM
Aug 2014

They have moved to level 1 responses before ( some merely for natural disasters or preplanned events)
Prior events include:

"
2011: Japan Earthquake and Tsunami
2010: New Hampshire Anthrax; Haiti Earthquake, Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, Haiti Cholera Outbreak
2009: Salmonella typhimurium outbreak; Presidential Inauguration; H1N1 Influenza
2008: Satellite intercept; Salmonella and E. coli outbreaks; Hurricane Dolly; Tropical Storm Edouard; Hurricanes Gustav, Hanna, and Ike
2007: XDR/MDR TB Patient; Hurricane Dean
2006: Mumps; Tropical Storm Ernesto; E. coli outbreaks, Botulism Outbreak, Mycoplasma Pneumonia
2005: Presidential Inauguration, Marburg virus; Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma
2004: Avian Influenza, BioWatch, Influenza vaccine shortage; Guam typhoon; Ricin; Citites Readiness Initiative, G8 Summit; Summer Olympics; Democratic National Convention; Republican National Convention; Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan, and Jeanne; West Nile Virus; Tsunami
2003: Columbia Space Shuttle Disaster; SARS; Monkeypox; Northeast blackout; Hurricane Isabel; Domestic Influenza; California wildfires; Ricin; Tularemia; Anthrax; BSE (Mad Cow Disease)
2001: World Trade Center Attacks; Anthrax Attacks "

source: http://www.cdc.gov/phpr/eoc_responses.htm#aar

Given the both international and inter-agency cooperation need for this it will be expensive and require more that a local state or even limited federal response.
for more info on how the criteria for which response level is is met see
http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf-core.pdf

Hope this helps.
bench

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CDC issues emergency 'all...