Treasury to limit profitability of overseas shifts
Source: AP-EXCITE
By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER
WASHINGTON (AP) Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew said Monday the Obama administration will decide "in the very near future" what actions it can take to make it less profitable for U.S. companies to shift their legal addresses to other countries.
A growing number of U.S. companies are shifting their addresses abroad in an effort to reduce their U.S. taxes. The maneuver is known as a corporate inversion.
In a speech Monday morning, Lew said these companies are eroding the U.S. tax base and shifting the burden of funding the government to other taxpayers. He said the best way to address the issue is for Congress to overhaul the U.S. tax code making it more attractive for companies to stay in the U.S.
With tax reform facing an uncertain future in Congress, Lew pressed lawmakers to pass legislation making it harder for U.S. companies to pull off corporate inversions.
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20140908/apfn-us--corporate_inversions-lew-b71bda32c7.html
IDemo
(16,926 posts)Yes, I am a clairvoyant.
benld74
(9,904 posts)the only reason their stocks are up is by this type of money shenanigans. Only care about their current bottom line and their CEO's next paycheck.
michreject
(4,378 posts)Just wondering.
WhoWoodaKnew
(847 posts)When you guys manage your own money do you do so with the government in mind or do you use every trick in the book to try to keep or save every penny? Maybe I'm unusual and a penny pincher but I use every method I can use to keep my family with as much money as possible (in case we go through bad times).
dotymed
(5,610 posts)with the highest taxes for operating a business?
I know that these corporations have lawyers who usually turn this around so that we subsidize these corporations.
It seems that simplifying the tax code just makes sense.
Currently the lobbyists write these laws so that it is a maze designed for the wealthiest to hire lawyers as navigators.
America is so crooked that the "commoners" don't stand much of a chance.
IMO, we need to get money out of politics before we can make any meaningful changes.
Having a "Supreme Court" who declared that limitless money in politics is legal and just an extension of "corporate speech" says it all.
Yep, "the system is not broken, it is fixed."
I know the odds are terrible but if we are "allowed" to elect Bernie Sanders, I strongly believe that would be the "shot heard around the world" and the best chance of a much need course correction for America.
"Full astern" would be nice.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)To write laws making my illegal acts legal.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)US is the only country that taxes world-wide income if repatriated. So companies don't repatriate the foreign earnings.
If the foreign earnings are taxed at a lower rate, all that capital will flow into the US economy.
msongs
(67,413 posts)citizen expense
BadgerKid
(4,553 posts)again.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)"The United States is one of two countries in the world that taxes its citizens on worldwide income, in the same manner and rates as residents; the other is Eritrea."
From: Feng, Andrew (2013-07-26). "Who else taxes like the United States?". IRSmedic.com. Retrieved 2013-12-18.
Since Eritrea is not a major or minor economic powerhouse, for all practical purposes, the US is the only country that does it.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Maybe I'm just an old cynic.