All Signs Point To Jeb Bush Presidential Run (heads to 2014 battleground states-No Carolina/ Kansas)
Source: CNBC-26 minutes ago
It's looking more and more like the 2016 presidential race will include John Ellis "Jeb" Bush, the former governor of Florida and a favorite of centrist Wall Street Republicans. Bush is said to be deep in preparation on issues beyond his traditional areas of focus on education and immigration policy. One person who met with Bush recently told me the former governor spoke passionately on foreign policy and economics and sounded very much like someone who plans to mount a presidential campaign. This person said Bush's main concern remains the impact of a campaign on his family, particularly his wife Columba, who does not like politics or the limelight. Others say the family concerns are overblown and that barring a late change of heart, Bush is almost certain to run. These people say Bush's father, former president George H.W. Bush, strongly urged his son to mount a campaign at a recent gathering at the family's compound in Kennebunkport, Maine.
People close to the family say Jeb Bush does not want to see New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie dominate the moderate lane in 2016. Bush also does not believe Mitt Romney will mount another campaign and believes the nomination of someone like Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., would produce an electoral disaster for for Republicans akin to the 1964 wipeout of GOP nominee Barry Goldwater. Mike Allen reports in Tuesday's Politico Playbook, Bush plans a heavy travel schedule for GOP candidates this fall including hot Senate races in North Carolina and Kansas. Bush has also done heavy fundraising for GOP candidates and the party over the summer. He also will host an event Tuesday night at his home in Tampa, Florida, for GOP senate candidates Tom Cotton of Arkansas; Joni Ernst of Iowa; Cory Gardner of Colorado; Dan Sullivan of Alaska; and Monica Wehby of Oregon.
All of the fundraising activity makes it seems very much like Bush is putting together a network of support for a bid in 2016 that could see him square off in a general election against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Such a Bush-Clinton race would harken back to the 1992 campaign between Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush, a fact some reject as tired dynasty politics and others see as a possibly edifying campaign of ideas between party heavyweights. But even if Jeb Bush does run he is certainly not guaranteed the nomination. Candidates such as Christie and possibly others will fight hard in the establishment, Wall Street-friendly lane. And Bush will get all he can handle and possibly more from the likes of Paul and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who excite the party's conservative activist base and could score early primary and caucus wins. And unlike in 2012, when Romney could simply wait out conservative flavor-of-the-week candidates, whoever emerges from that pack in 2016 will almost certainly have the financial backing to compete all the way through the primary season. That means if Jeb Bush runs, he will have to run all-out and be prepared for a nasty dog fight and not expect gentle coronation.
Read more: http://www.cnbc.com/id/102025140
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Were gonna have to GOTV and hope for a USSC flip.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Last edited Wed Sep 24, 2014, 06:38 PM - Edit history (1)
It's fairly obvious to me it was the Bush family trying to set Christie up to eliminate him. It was decided in 2008 that 2016 would be Jeb vs Hillary...Jeb being the preferred candidate and Hillary being the back up plan in case he loses since she is in their pocket. They both disgust me and anyone on our side who supports Hillary is a fool...educate yourself. These two families are close friends and Bush Sr has publicly referred to Bill Clinton as his 5th son since 2000. It was all a charade...theater for the gullible, stupid masses in '92. And Bill was a good soldier covering up for Bush in '93 to allow that administration headed by his son to return to power in 2000 as planned. GW is awful but Hillary makes me want to vomit in my own mouth for pretending to be one of us. I'd rather drop out of politics and hit the streets and town halls than vote for her and hundreds of thousands feel the same way.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)bsiebs
(688 posts)Oh please... no one is going to totally satisfy you... they don't satisfy me.. but please do not say they are the same... LOOK AT THE SUPREME COURT.. that by itself should at least make you act in a reasonable way.. I have no time for people that say they are dropping out because the two parties are the same... THEY ARE NOT
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)No one said the two parties are the same and Im sorry but you must live in a cocoon sheltered from the real world if you cannot see what is happening and be disgusted. Things are very different at the executive level. Jimmy Carter is appalled so why aren't you...he is a much better person than any of these frauds. It is a fact that the Clintons are best buddies with the Bushes and have had a major hand in ruining our party...they sold out to the big banks and oil and weapons corporations by running to the center and the reason everything is crazy now is because this forced the republicans to run further to the right. It is their fault we have these crazed idiots now because they are the ones who moved the center to the right. Its our fault for being dumb enough to ignore our conscience and fall for it yes but as far as Im concerned they don't deserve to wear the name democrat and should never have been allowed in our party to begin with. If your idea of realism is persuading everyone to essentially become a republican (not by name but by actions) then I have no use at all for you either.
muntrv
(14,505 posts)TBF
(32,064 posts)I think the only way they don't go with him is if they really think they can't beat who the dems put up (as others here have suggested as well). We see GWB as a war criminal while their party thinks he was amazing (tax breaks). It's no surprise that they would go to that family again.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)Yep.. At the expense of our kids... Lets push this one..
Auggie
(31,173 posts)TexasTowelie
(112,248 posts)We have not forgotten about the last Bush yet.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,841 posts)They can draw a line between the bad Bush and the good Bush. The ongoing reputation rehabbing of Poppy hasn't hurt much, either. Makes let's them think W was just an anomaly in an otherwise distinguished line of public servants.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)wait until Jeb another puppet for the Chickenhawks become President.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)get under Jeb.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)I never want to see or hear from a Bush again.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)underpants
(182,829 posts)Scrub as they might people still don't like the Bush brand.
still_one
(92,219 posts)reform, and will do everything in his power to bring the hispanic vote into the republican fold.
There is no way this bush will run on his brothers record.
Our advantage is to remind everyone what his brother did, and how their policies not only caused the financial collapse, but destabilized the entire middle east. Where Jeb will lose it when he tries to defend his brother's administration like he did at the republican convention.
If Hillary runs and wins the nomination, it should bring the women's right vote to our camp. Jeb can back track all he want from the republican platform and the war against women, but it will be very difficult for him to convince them.
However, we should constantly remind people as you said, "Do you really want another bush in the white house"?
underpants
(182,829 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)Reform stance.
Plus he will take southern sweep with little trouble IMO
Another Bush in the WH ? A 4th could be in the wings too. He already holds office in TX I think
still_one
(92,219 posts)is going to back him, and we have to hit hard and early the moment he announces
AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)But not our last.
Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)I know DU remembers how shitty Junior was, but does the American public?
Doubtful.
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)A W K W A R D ! ! !
bwhahahahah
"Momma said what?!!!"
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)logosoco
(3,208 posts)that is saying a lot.
This is going to be my mantra if he wins the primary.
MADem
(135,425 posts)He looked a bit fat, dumb and happy in his private life .... though this is not the first time I've heard this rumor--it was making the rounds about six months ago, too.
http://themoderatevoice.com/194999/jeb-bush-increasingly-sounds-like-hes-in/
villager
(26,001 posts)Maybe 4th party, too.
The failure of "electoral" politics would be so starkly unavoidable and obvious, in such a match-up, either voters will stay home in droves, or someone might seize the historical moment to take advantage of the death throes of "two" party politics...
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Contrary1
(12,629 posts)TRoN33
(769 posts)ErikJ
(6,335 posts)The neo-cons HATE Common Core and will reject him.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)ErikJ
(6,335 posts).........................................
But if Bush runs, he'll have to contend with an obstacle every bit as daunting as his last nameCommon Core. His educational nonprofit, the Foundation for Excellence in Education, has been a leading supporter of Common Core, and he has recently joined another group, Conservatives for Higher Standards, to defend the standards against what he calls an "avalanche" of opposition. If that avalanche grows any bigger, it threatens to block any path Bush may have to becoming the Republican Party's 2016 standard-bearer.
Adopted five years ago by 45 states, the guidelines are designed to provide a modicum of standardization across the country, so that a child in Idaho and a child in Florida might reasonably be expected to learn the same things at the same times. From the start, the standards were derided by some conservatives for the expenses they would bring, or as a power grab that would erode local control, water down existing state curricula, or, yes, even brainwash children with leftist material. But it's only in the last two years, as students have begun to take the Core-compliant standardized tests, that parentsand in turn, politicians and key right-leaning news outletshave begun to take note.
Glenn Beck, who has called Common Core "the biggest story in American history," is writing a book about the standards. Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) signed a letter demanding the federal government stop funding it. Building the Machine, a new anti-Core documentary modeled after the viral video campaign to stop Ugandan warlord Joseph Kony, has been viewed 150,000 times in the two weeks since its release. Fox News bashes it on a daily basis. Even Stephen Colbert has taken on Common Core.
Like any good conspiracy, Common Core has a lot of villains. The standards were conceived in a paper by two men, David Coleman and Jason Zimba, a classicist and a physicist, respectively, who studied together at Oxford as Rhodes Scholars. Development and implementation of the standards was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which boosted them by pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into state departments of education, school districts, unions, universities, and educational nonprofits. The US Department of Education enticed states to come on board with $4.35 billion in funding from a stimulus program called Race to the Top.
...............................
Contrary1
(12,629 posts)The clock is ticking...we need a Eugene McCarthy type candidate, and soon.
Paper Roses
(7,473 posts)Have we not had enough of this family? That fact that has not registered with Jeb shows and how little he cares about what we think. He knows any support he might have would be one sided.
Time for all of this family to go elsewhere---anywhere---and be out of the mainstream. Enough!
CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)Seriously, seriously sick.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Despite its notoriety, the Bush name will prove to be an advantage for Jeb for people who choose their candidates the way they choose soft drinks.
And because he's not an obvious buffoon like his brother, people will tragically perceive him as "statesman-like" and "moderate."
Meanwhile, Hillary detractors will attract a strange coalition of knuckle-dragging Bible-addled misogynists, along with genuine anti-war, anti-corporate progressives. The former will almost certainly vote for Jeb. The latter, disgusted by the hair's-breadth difference between the two candidates, will either stay home or vote for a third-party candidate.
CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)Also, I hate to say it, but a lot of America wants a white man back in office.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)ballyhoo
(2,060 posts)coupled with the rest of the wars by the peace president, if Bush runs, he wins. And once those boots hit the ground, that will assure his victory even more. We are looking at disaster beyond comprehension.
delete_bush
(1,712 posts)If this happens, and the 'winner' stays for 2 terms, this would mean that over a 36 year period either a Bush or a Clinton was in office for 28 of those years. What a democracy.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)The ultra conservatives would hate it. The public isn't ready for another Bush disaster. It would be an easy win for the Democratic party.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)Pondered it for a minute, and realized you're talking about the Senate race this year. Can't really imagine it being in play for 2016.
big_dog
(4,144 posts)trickle down economics fail
elleng
(130,973 posts)Hulk
(6,699 posts)Watching that Ken Burns series on PBS sheds so much light on what is going on YET today with politics in this country. We are in the same basic "game". Different players, but always the powerful corporatist a in control. "We the People" is just a platitude. I think we really do need a second revolution in this country to ever realize change. I'm not suggesting nor promoting it; but we are just spinning our wheels with who the corporatists select for us to chose from.
You will NEVER see any real change from Wall Street or the big corporations. They are only going to appease us with letting us dance in the streets and wave our banners.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)Seriously, the man has been politically irrelevant for almost 12 years. Being the only Bush capable of speaking in complete sentences isn't magically going to make him viable.
There's also the matter of him being toxic to the base.
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)The Bush Family Evil Empire (BFEE) wants a dynasty.
But just how are they going to hush up about Jeb's wife's customs violation and daughter's drug problems?
cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)Overlay audio of W's "can't get fooled again" bit on HW's "No new taxes" video and HW tossing chunks in Japan, any of many pieces of W video and end on slow motion pan of grainy Black and White photo of Jeb looking out from behind W with the dorky look on his face. "Paid for and approved by the Give Us a Fucking Break Committee"
AlinPA
(15,071 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)See also http://www.familyofsecrets.com/
roamer65
(36,745 posts)Yet again I will end up voting more against the Rethugs, than for Dems.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)They might as well run together on a national unity platform.
"One nation, under Wall Street"
mnhtnbb
(31,392 posts)to go fu*k himself.
Good god, NOT another Bush.
OldRedneck
(1,397 posts)So -- Jeb thinks Rand Paul's nomination would be as big a disaster for the GOTP as was Goldwater in 1964??
WTF does he think his own nomination will be? Oh, yes, the GOTP faithful will swoon over another Bush but the rest of the nation will drop him like a bad habit.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Although many of us get nauseous when we hear the "Bush" name, about 40% of the country will vote for him in a match up with any Democrat. The question is will the Independents go for him over Hillary or whoever our candidate is. Depending how the campaign goes, he could be a tough candidate. I still think we win but Jeb might make it interesting.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Where someone is forced to repeat the same hour, over and over again, trying to avoid the same mistakes, except that whatever causes the error is never discovered, never confronted, making the same loop of time go again and again.
Honestly, while I am no fan of Putin's Russia, or Beijing, and not of Isis, there is an ugly fact. If the best that we can offer in 2016 is another Bush and another Clinton, that means our cancers have advanced, and the rest of humanity will know it. The tragedy is that neither the Bushes not the Clintons seem to realize that there was anything wrong with their relatives policies.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Off-topic: my favorite quote "I'm a god, not thee God"
Don't drive angry
The groundhog looks pretty damn angry.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)And I think it's more than likely.