Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,026 posts)
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 02:18 AM Oct 2014

Judge rules against park ranger who used stun gun on dog walker

Source: SF Chronicle

A federal judge ruled that a National Park Service ranger acted unlawfully with unreasonable force when she used a stun gun on a man who was walking his dogs off-leash after he gave her a false name in unincorporated San Mateo County in 2012.

The incident began the afternoon of Jan. 29, 2012, when Gary Hesterberg, 50, of Montara took his two dogs, a beagle named Jack and a rat terrier named JoJo, on a walk as he’d done many times before in the Rancho Corral de Tierra open space, referred to as the Rancho.

The Rancho always had laws requiring that dogs be kept on-leash, but the court found no evidence that the law had been enforced, and Hesterberg was used to letting JoJo run free. The land had recently been acquired by the Golden Gate National Recreation Area and part of Ranger Sarah Cavallaro’s duty that day, the first day of enforcement, was to “take an 'educational approach or soft enforcement’ with regards to violations of the Rancho’s new rules,” according to court documents.

Cavallaro stopped Hesterberg and talked to him about the new rules. The conversation grew increasingly contentious, and Hesterberg gave the ranger a fake last name because, he testified, “I don’t want to be placed on some offending dog walker ... list.”

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Judge-rules-against-park-ranger-who-used-stun-gun-5813401.php

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
1. That it appears she resorted to a taser w/o being physically threatened
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 02:26 AM
Oct 2014

makes what she did criminal (IMO)

I must have missed the Amendment in the Constitution which said you had to give your real name when walking your dog off leash

SpartanDem

(4,533 posts)
2. Did you missed where it's illegal give false info?
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 02:40 AM
Oct 2014

Not saying that justifies what she did, but it is crime.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
13. from the link in the OP
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 03:29 PM
Oct 2014
Though the court conceded that lying to a police officer is not an offense to be taken lightly, there is nothing inherently dangerous about it, especially in connection to a warning about a leash law violation.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
4. Which is the greater crime? Giving false info or using an unwarranted act of violence?
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 04:26 AM
Oct 2014

Too often law enforcement personnel act like they are in the midst of a video game.

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
5. Did you miss the part where it's illegal to use unecessary force?
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 05:11 AM
Oct 2014

He was freaking walking his dog like he had done many times before.

Perhaps you might have missed the part of common law that says that if there is a law, but the enforcement officers regularly ignore it, then the law becomes invalid.

She never stated any real reason he was being either "detained" nor "arrested." Therefore he was free to go.

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
7. I can't see that giving a false name is much
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 06:01 AM
Oct 2014

different from an officer refusing to wear a name tag when required. I have not seen any officers without name tags being tazed.

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
9. Did you miss the part where officer found guilty of unlawful force?
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 09:48 AM
Oct 2014

With all the bad cops out there, why the fuck would anyone cooperate willingly? It's like our war on drugs and terror, America's brutality is just making the problems of this world worse. Much worse.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
6. Another "you will obey my every command or I will punish you" scenario.
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 05:13 AM
Oct 2014

Getting really sick of it.

We need to start a movement to overhaul all police/leo training.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
8. When escalation of force training teaches LEO that they must dominate every situation
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 09:38 AM
Oct 2014

there is your reason cops go from Zero to Asshole in nothing flat, as 'disrespect' must be met with increased force instead of trying to defuse a confrontation they lost control of.

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
11. 100% agree
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 12:10 PM
Oct 2014

Cops are trained and it is drilled into their psyche that they MUST be in control of any situation either through their actions or mere physical presence on a scene. Remember the uproar (seems so tame now) about cops wearing black leather gloves and the image that projected.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
12. we will see much more of these harsh police. The parks just changed all of the
Fri Oct 10, 2014, 02:10 PM
Oct 2014

"traditionally dogs run free beaches and parklands" to on leash or no dogs allowed.

And our Parks and our Public Lands- will hire the "crabby, abusive, military police" to enforce the new over-regulating, excessive ticketing on "the peoples" parks and lands.

good thing this police officer didn't have a gun or she may have killed the dog runner.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge rules against park ...