Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 10:39 AM Nov 2014

President Obama Has Asked FCC to Implement 'Strongest Possible Rules' to Protect Net Neutrality

Last edited Mon Nov 10, 2014, 11:52 AM - Edit history (2)

Source: Reuters

@BreakingNews: RT @breakingbytes: President Obama has asked the FCC to implement 'strongest possible rules' to protect net neutrality - @Reuters http://t.co/gAPs13D1To/s/gPcJ

Obama urged the FCC to prohibit 'paid prioritization' deals in which content providers pay to ensure smooth delivery of their traffic - @Reuters

Obama Urges FCC To Set 'Strongest Possible Rules' To Protect Net Neutrality
Reuters
Posted: 11/10/2014 9:48 am EST Updated: 50 minutes ago

WASHINGTON, Nov 10 (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama asked the Federal Communications Commissionon Monday to set the 'strongest possible rules' to protect net neutrality as agency writes new Internet traffic regulations.

Obama urged the FCC to prohibit so-called paid prioritization, deals in which content providers would pay Internet companies to ensure smooth delivery of traffic.

He said the FCC should reclassify consumer broadband service to be regulated more like a public utility. (Reporting Alina Selyukh; Editing by Doina Chiacu)

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/10/obama-net-neutrality_n_6132814.html

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President Obama Has Asked FCC to Implement 'Strongest Possible Rules' to Protect Net Neutrality (Original Post) Hissyspit Nov 2014 OP
Good for him! n/t JimDandy Nov 2014 #1
VIDEO: President Obama's Statement on Keeping the Internet Open and Free proverbialwisdom Nov 2014 #16
Good for him vi5 Nov 2014 #2
Jeepers tabasco Nov 2014 #40
It's the only thing we the people have left. OffWithTheirHeads Nov 2014 #3
It definitely is, and they are doing everything they can to destroy it. Good for Obama! n/t RKP5637 Nov 2014 #4
definitely. n/t BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2014 #32
Thank you Mr. President. jwirr Nov 2014 #5
What jwirr said. BlueJazz Nov 2014 #6
+1 proverbialwisdom Nov 2014 #10
Good on him! riqster Nov 2014 #7
LOL! With a corporate STOOGE in the chairman's seat Plucketeer Nov 2014 #8
Didn't Obama appoint that "corporate STOOGE"? L0oniX Nov 2014 #12
More. proverbialwisdom Nov 2014 #15
Yes he did Plucketeer Nov 2014 #18
A Comcast guy? Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #24
What would be the parameters of 'running amok,' precisely? proverbialwisdom Nov 2014 #27
K&R!! Bloomberg News is covering the story in depth. Check it out. (nt) proverbialwisdom Nov 2014 #9
Asked? L0oniX Nov 2014 #11
"CALLS ON" per Bloomberg News headlines. (nt) proverbialwisdom Nov 2014 #17
Hey, now he can add it to "THE LIST" vi5 Nov 2014 #42
All according to the 9th dimensional chess plan. L0oniX Nov 2014 #44
That can mean only one thing... NorthCarolina Nov 2014 #13
You got it! But the new scheme to keep MSM and the public ballyhoo Nov 2014 #25
Asks? Don't they work for him? Scuba Nov 2014 #14
Yes, but they don't have to obey him. riqster Nov 2014 #19
Excellent news. K&R! Nt riderinthestorm Nov 2014 #20
So why wasn't this made an issue at all during the midterms? Dopers_Greed Nov 2014 #21
Exactly! BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #35
If he really means it he can use the bully pulpit to apply serious pressure. pa28 Nov 2014 #22
Kim Dotcom for FCC chair... and then PRESIDENT! Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #28
Obama and Cong. Democrats should have Run. On. This. Issue. alp227 Nov 2014 #23
Because millennials don't matter and old people don't get computers Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #26
Uhh, have you seen all the right wing pages on Facebook? Not buying your rant. alp227 Nov 2014 #34
Billions of dollars are at stake. Check out BloombergTV. (nt) proverbialwisdom Nov 2014 #29
+++++ BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #36
Tech companies donate losts of $$$ to Democratic politicians. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #46
Ted Cruz Says Net Neutrality Is 'Obamacare For The Internet' (the crazy keeps rolling on) NordicLeft Nov 2014 #30
Lol! BeanMusical Nov 2014 #37
This is great news! Now all of the crazy Republicans are going to turn against it. 6000eliot Nov 2014 #31
This sounds promising. myrna minx Nov 2014 #33
LOL. "Obama asks" = it won't happen. PSPS Nov 2014 #38
Uh oh. We all know what this means. The deal's already been cut to put in toll roads on the internet blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #39
Swell. He "asked" his friend Tom Wheeler to save net neutrality when he knows full well rhett o rick Nov 2014 #41
Excellent, for us (nt) Babel_17 Nov 2014 #43
If we loose this fight it will be a catastrophic loss for Democracy BadGimp Nov 2014 #45

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
16. VIDEO: President Obama's Statement on Keeping the Internet Open and Free
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 12:19 PM
Nov 2014


President Obama's Statement on Keeping the Internet Open and Free

Published on Nov 10, 2014
The White House


President Obama today urged the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to take up the strongest possible rules to protect net neutrality, the principle that says Internet service providers (ISPs) should treat all internet traffic equally.

SOURCE: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017225835

Huge uproar on cable business channels.
 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
2. Good for him
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 10:51 AM
Nov 2014

Probably good that he waited until after the election to do this. Might have energized the youth vote who really care about this issue.

Really dodged a bullet with that one.

 

OffWithTheirHeads

(10,337 posts)
3. It's the only thing we the people have left.
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 10:51 AM
Nov 2014

All other forms of communication have been co-opted by our corporate masters.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
8. LOL! With a corporate STOOGE in the chairman's seat
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 11:22 AM
Nov 2014

just WHERE can this request go??? I'm sorry to confess that I'm NOT optimistic on this issue - and I DO consider it the last bullhorn we (the people) have. When this is gone, it's time to grab our guns. And I'm NOT an advocate of guns!

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
15. More.
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 12:10 PM
Nov 2014
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/11/10/morning-agenda-lackluster-bonus-season-looms/

MORNING AGENDA

By SYDNEY EMBER NOVEMBER 10, 2014 7:45 AM

<>

CABLE MERGER PUTS INVESTORS ON EDGE | “The debate over net neutrality and cable company concentration has been rattling Wall Street,” Jeff Sommer writes in the Strategies column. The market’s discomfort is evident in the unusual moves in the share prices of Comcast and Time Warner Cable, the two cable giants that announced in February that they intended to merge in a $45 billion all-stock deal. Their adjusted prices should be converging ‒ assuming the merger will eventually be completed without major problems ‒ but the spread has actually widened strikingly since early September. As regulatory issues crucial to cable companies and the Internet have heated up, the stock market has reacted with varying degrees of concern.

Investor concerns focus mainly on the Internet side of cable operations. For one, there are questions about whether the Federal Communications Commission will act to ensure an open Internet, known as net neutrality, and whether the commission’s decision will impair the profitability of cable companies. Federal agencies could also block the merger outright. “As always, the market is converting the collective intelligence of its participants into prices, and there is evidence that investors are worried,” Mr. Sommer writes.

“Net neutrality and the merger are political issues. After last week’s election, they could become a flash point in relations between a Republican Congress and the Democratic administration. Strong action by the F.C.C., the Federal Trade Commission or the Justice Department could result in Republican pushback aimed at limiting the F.C.C.’s authority,” Mr. Sommer adds. “Where all of this is heading isn’t clear, which means there’s good reason for the market to be jumpy.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/09/your-money/the-stock-market-is-on-edge-about-a-cable-merger.html

...One market flurry occurred after remarks by President Obama at an Oct. 9 town hall meeting in Santa Monica, Calif., in which he said he was “unequivocally committed” to net neutrality and against “paid prioritization,” or Internet fast lanes, in which some companies could pay cable companies for faster access to consumers. He called for tough rule-making by the F.C.C. — which could potentially limit the profitability of the cable companies.
 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
18. Yes he did
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 12:41 PM
Nov 2014

And I guess I'm to assume he got the ONLY qualified individual he could find for the job.

Ampersand Unicode

(503 posts)
24. A Comcast guy?
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 01:02 PM
Nov 2014

Geez, I'd feel better if he appointed Kim Dotcom to the position. Arrested on a warrant for pissing Hollywood off.

He's a lot better than the REAL criminals running amok in Washington right now.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
42. Hey, now he can add it to "THE LIST"
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 08:35 AM
Nov 2014

You know the one of all his "accomplishments"?

You know the ones where he "Pledged to...." do something?

Or "Committed to....." doing something?

This will fit nicely on there.

ANOTHER VICTORY LAP!!!!

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
13. That can mean only one thing...
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 11:50 AM
Nov 2014

Drop your socks and grab your...mouse; we're poised for a tiered internet experience in America!

 

ballyhoo

(2,060 posts)
25. You got it! But the new scheme to keep MSM and the public
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 01:05 PM
Nov 2014

memorized by faux sincere speeches about net neutrality while TPP becomes a done deal is unleashed by Dear Leader. How many times can this man get away with the same routine?

Dopers_Greed

(2,640 posts)
21. So why wasn't this made an issue at all during the midterms?
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 12:54 PM
Nov 2014

Part of his "rope-a-dope" strategy I guess...

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
35. Exactly!
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 01:44 PM
Nov 2014

What the hell is this about? And why the silence during a recent election?? Oh yeah, we can't give young people anything they care about! This is such a strange move, it is rather suspicious. If he means it, then I'm all for it. But if he's rope-a-doping us again...

pa28

(6,145 posts)
22. If he really means it he can use the bully pulpit to apply serious pressure.
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 12:59 PM
Nov 2014

A better solution might have been to appoint a chair with a history of supporting net neutrality but hey. At least he's finally responding to the FCC's proposal.

alp227

(32,037 posts)
23. Obama and Cong. Democrats should have Run. On. This. Issue.
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 01:02 PM
Nov 2014

Why the frick did Obama wait until AFTER the election to weigh in on this? Because Democrats needed the donations from the internet companies?

Ampersand Unicode

(503 posts)
26. Because millennials don't matter and old people don't get computers
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 01:12 PM
Nov 2014

This is considered a fringe issue for young people (unimportant demographic) because it's new media and tech. The party mainstream can't make a political issue about the Internet (aka "things we don't understand and don't have to&quot and risk scaring the olds who struggle to find YouTube on the UHF dial.

Only young people (and nerds) care about things like net neutrality and copyright wars. The rest are more than content to just keep on truckin' to the same half-dozen or so 8-track tapes they BOUGHT LEGITIMATELY FOR A WHOLE GODDAMN NICKEL AT JOE'S VARIETY STORE!!!

Most people don't care as long as they can still watch Monday Night Football and stalk their grandkids on "Bookface." The digital natives do care, but they don't have the pocket change to make any significant political inroads. All they (we, I'm a member of that generation even though I avoid social media like the plague) can do is make protest memes and hack things with an Anonymous logo. So long as the entrenched interests can rely on the ignorance of the mainstream populace who don't care about innovation and fairness (because they don't use the Internet or don't care as much as the young do), net neutrality is dead. After all, why should the olds care about "equal content delivery" when they did just fine with three TV networks and AM radio?

alp227

(32,037 posts)
34. Uhh, have you seen all the right wing pages on Facebook? Not buying your rant.
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 01:28 PM
Nov 2014

Learning from the Obama 2008 digital outreach strategy, the Tea Party movement aggressively used the Internet to spread their message. That's why you see right wing memes on Facebook a lot. And see http://myrightwingdad.blogspot.com/

 

NordicLeft

(36 posts)
30. Ted Cruz Says Net Neutrality Is 'Obamacare For The Internet' (the crazy keeps rolling on)
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 01:22 PM
Nov 2014
http://www.businessinsider.com/ted-cruz-net-neutrality-is-obamacare-for-the-internet-2014-11

'"Net Neutrality' is Obamacare for the Internet; the Internet should not operate at the speed of government," Cruz wrote on Twitter.

Cruz's spokeswoman, Amanda Carpenter, added that net neutrality would place the government "in charge of determining pricing, terms of service, and what products can be delivered. Sound like Obamacare much?"


snip


BeanMusical

(4,389 posts)
37. Lol!
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 02:42 PM
Nov 2014

I doubt that this moron have any idea about the origins of the net. Primarily the U.S Government.

"The US Department of Defense awarded contracts as early as the 1960s for packet network systems, including the development of the ARPANET (which would become the first network to use the Internet Protocol.)"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Internet

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
41. Swell. He "asked" his friend Tom Wheeler to save net neutrality when he knows full well
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 01:11 AM
Nov 2014

that Tom doesn't believe in that. The President appoints a fox to guard the hen house then tells the fox he should treat the chickens nicely.

BadGimp

(4,015 posts)
45. If we loose this fight it will be a catastrophic loss for Democracy
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 02:43 PM
Nov 2014

Most of information and content wil be transmitted via IP or Internet Protocol = online.

If the Telcos and the Cable Cos take control of internet content distribution by establishing pricing for content distributors while also charging you and I to access content, we will be SO FUCKING SCREWED. It will make the present main stream media take down look like a sleepover.

Since humor sells and explains much better at times than real narrative, I give you The Oatmeal's letter to Ted Cruz: "Dear Senator Ted Cruz"
http://theoatmeal.com/blog/net_neutrality

Make no mistake about it people, this is a major fight we can not afford to loose.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»President Obama Has Asked...