Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,669 posts)
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 11:14 AM Nov 2014

GM ordered switches nearly 2 months before recall

Source: AP-EXCITE

DETROIT (AP) — Emails from a court case show that General Motors Co. ordered 500,000 replacement ignition switches almost two months before telling government safety regulators that the switches would be recalled.

The emails released by Texas attorney Robert Hilliard show that GM placed an urgent order for switches from Delphi Corp. on Dec. 18 for a safety issue. The cars weren't recalled until Feb. 7.

The order wasn't mentioned when GM CEO Mary Barra testified before Congress.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20141110/us--general_motors-documents-a7d386d2d0.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GM ordered switches nearly 2 months before recall (Original Post) Omaha Steve Nov 2014 OP
How can you announce a recall without the replacements in stock? House of Roberts Nov 2014 #1
So what? pipoman Nov 2014 #2
This recall does not replace the ignition switch ChromeFoundry Nov 2014 #3
You tell them they may die if they drive the car. That might be more inconvenience jtuck004 Nov 2014 #4
Remember when Toyota blamed floor mats, sticky gas pedals and driver error? ChromeFoundry Nov 2014 #6
Seems like a pretty short turn around time Ruby the Liberal Nov 2014 #5

House of Roberts

(5,178 posts)
1. How can you announce a recall without the replacements in stock?
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 11:23 AM
Nov 2014

The supplier would also need time to make the parts as well. Fifty one days seems like a very short turnaround from order to delivery.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
2. So what?
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 11:26 AM
Nov 2014

They were supposed to announce a recall with no replacement parts? Really, who could possibly not get this? Duh...

ChromeFoundry

(3,270 posts)
3. This recall does not replace the ignition switch
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 12:06 PM
Nov 2014

The recall was originally supposed to include a replacement ignition switch, lock cylinder and keys. I just had my recall performed about two weeks ago. The only thing they did was glue a plastic insert into my keys, turning the slot into a hole:



Nothing was replaced. This recall is a complete waste of time.

Unless you walk around with a key chain that looks like this...

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
4. You tell them they may die if they drive the car. That might be more inconvenience
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 12:22 PM
Nov 2014

than if they didn't have the part ready, but death is hard to get a replacement part to fix.

Unless your company considers profits more important than human lives.

ChromeFoundry

(3,270 posts)
6. Remember when Toyota blamed floor mats, sticky gas pedals and driver error?
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 12:46 PM
Nov 2014

Then a third party proved the problem to be with a software defect that caused the vehicles to accelerate uncontrollably due to a race condition?

Toyota fought that one for over four years.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
5. Seems like a pretty short turn around time
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 12:34 PM
Nov 2014

to prepare for a recall and have the parts in the hands of their suppliers and dealerships.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»GM ordered switches nearl...