Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 09:44 PM Nov 2014

FCC calls AT&T’s fiber bluff, demands detailed construction plans

Source: Ars Technica

Two days after AT&T claimed it has to "pause" a 100-city fiber build because of uncertainty over network neutrality rules, the Federal Communications Commission today asked the company to finally detail its vague plans for fiber construction.

Despite making all sorts of bold promises about bringing fiber to customers and claiming its fiber construction is contingent on the government giving it what it wants, AT&T has never detailed its exact fiber plans. For one thing, AT&T never promised to build in all of the 100 cities and towns it named as potential fiber spots. The company would only build in cities and towns where local leaders gave AT&T whatever it wanted. In all likelihood, only a small portion of the 100 municipalities were likely to get fiber, and nobody knows which ones.

... Ferris asked Quinn for a response by November 21. AT&T told Re/code that it is “happy to respond to the questions posed by the FCC in its review of our merger with DirecTV. As we made clear earlier this week, we remain committed to our DirecTV merger-related build-out plans.”

Read more: http://arstechnica.com/business/2014/11/fcc-calls-atts-fiber-bluff-demands-detailed-construction-plans/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FCC calls AT&T’s fiber bluff, demands detailed construction plans (Original Post) Newsjock Nov 2014 OP
Centurylink is "touting" its Gig fiber optics here in Denver Eridenus Nov 2014 #1
Out here in 'flyover' Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #3
So much for the Universal Access that was once guaranteed. RIH, Ronnie Raygun. freshwest Nov 2014 #9
are you saying the breakup of the Bell monopoly was a bad thing? onenote Nov 2014 #14
Good. elleng Nov 2014 #2
It'll most like ly look like this between 2 fancy covers, (see Below) imthevicar Nov 2014 #11
They over extended themselves JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #4
you under estimate the amount of money att has belzabubba333 Nov 2014 #6
I gotta agree with that. freshwest Nov 2014 #8
They haven't sold through JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #13
No I don't JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #12
chattanooga high speed internet juxtaposed Nov 2014 #5
att wants to cherry pick highincome neighborhoods. elehhhhna Nov 2014 #7
ha ha! C Moon Nov 2014 #10
 

Eridenus

(52 posts)
1. Centurylink is "touting" its Gig fiber optics here in Denver
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 09:47 PM
Nov 2014

and it ain't anywhere in downtown Denver or southeast Denver...

So I question their lies.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
3. Out here in 'flyover'
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 09:50 PM
Nov 2014

(Ohio) if you want fiber, you have to pay for the entire length to connect it to the next nearest fiber, which means that only the really rich can afford to take the plunge. The rest of us have to wait until it's basically already on our streets.

onenote

(42,714 posts)
14. are you saying the breakup of the Bell monopoly was a bad thing?
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 08:35 PM
Nov 2014

Trying to figure out what the reagan connection is and the only thing i can figure you're referring to is the fact that the decade long antitrust case against AT&T finally was resolved in 1982 by the Modified Final Judgment (modified and administered by Carter appointee Judge Harold Greene).

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
13. They haven't sold through
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 07:47 AM
Nov 2014

Their existing fiber yet. In their race to be the biggest they misunderstood consumer demand.

I don't think the consumer demand is there for high speed fiber based data. It's there - but it's not as huge a demand as regular posters at a message board (ie we at DU are web centric) - need it to be. We are different. We are information sponges. Not Instagram posters.

And I want net neutrality - because it gets us closer to a divestiture scenario - and I have a niche idea as a reseller I could be succesful at. But the fastest way to get to a divestiture scenario is for the big 4 to get just a little bigger.

I also think they have lost their shirts on the iPhone 6 thefts. My company was prepared - even with that prep - we are still pulling DFill off of trucks. My understanding is they don't have a freight control org that interoperates with their homeland security functions. Look for them to write off fraud for Q4 when they release their earnings next year.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FCC calls AT&T’s fibe...