Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 01:49 PM Nov 2014

Steven Chu warns UK its nuclear plans risk becoming financial drain

Source: Guardian

Former US energy chief and Nobel physicist says UK plan to build various types of reactors is expensive and time-consuming

A world-leading energy expert has warned that although the British government is right to proceed with new nuclear plants they risk becoming a “financial drain” unless they can be built on time and on budget.

Steven Chu, the former US energy secretary and Nobel prizewinning physicist, believes using a variety of different reactor designs – as the UK looks poised to do – is not the best way to keep costs down.

“Unless we can learn to build nuclear on schedule and on budget it will be a financial drain. Other countries have learned how to do this: South Korea has built 10 plants exactly the same and the tenth plant was only 60% of the cost of the original one. The cost came marching down because they just kept doing the same thing,” he told the Guardian.

<snip>

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/nov/16/steven-cru-warns-uk-nuclear-plans



South Korea cut costs by cheating and lying - and doing it over and over again:
In November 2012 it was discovered that over 5,000 small components used in five reactors at Yeonggwang Nuclear Power Plant had not been properly certified; eight suppliers had faked 60 warranties for the parts. Two reactors were shut down for component replacement, which is likely to cause power shortages in South Korea during the winter.[13] Reuters reported this as South Korea's worst nuclear crisis, highlighting a lack of transparency on nuclear safety and the dual roles of South Korea's nuclear regulators on supervision and promotion.[14] This incident followed the prosecution of five senior engineers for the coverup of a serious loss of power and cooling incident at Kori Nuclear Power Plant, which was subsequently graded at INES level 2.[13][15]

In 2013, there was a scandal involving the use of counterfeit parts in nuclear plants and faked quality assurance certificates. In June 2013 Kori 2 and Shin Wolsong 1 were shutdown, and Kori 1 and Shin Wolsong 2 ordered to remain offline, until safety-related control cabling with forged safety certificates is replaced.[16] Control cabling in the first APR-1400s under construction had to be replaced delaying construction by up to a year.[17] In October 2013 about 100 people were indicted for falsifying safety documents, including a former chief executive of Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power and a vice-president of Korea Electric Power Corporation.[18]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_South_Korea

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Steven Chu warns UK its nuclear plans risk becoming financial drain (Original Post) bananas Nov 2014 OP
Chu's not the only one warning about UK nuclear costs bananas Nov 2014 #1
His warnings were the opposite - that there's no saving in building several of the same type muriel_volestrangler Nov 2014 #2

bananas

(27,509 posts)
1. Chu's not the only one warning about UK nuclear costs
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 01:56 PM
Nov 2014

Tony Roulstone, who runs the Master's programme in nuclear engineering in Cambridge, gave similar warnings a few weeks ago:

'Unconstructable' Hinkley C could end UK's nuclear dream
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016105755

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
2. His warnings were the opposite - that there's no saving in building several of the same type
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 02:32 PM
Nov 2014
Actually, he went on to say, unlike any other energy technology in the world, global power station builders are seeing very little benefit from constructing larger nuclear power stations. And, crucially, the cost reductions derived from building multiple power stations of a single type (the so-called 'learning effect') are turning out to be small or non-existent.

Roulstone mused on why this might be. He said that learning effects are usually observed for goods made in factories. The fact that nuclear power stations are almost entirely constructed on individual sites meant that the expertise gathered in one place are not transferred to the next construction project.

Recent experience, such as at the Finnish EPR construction site, shows that management is particularly difficult when large bands of workers, sometimes speaking different languages, try to work productively together in a relatively small and cramped area. The workforce is unused to the extremely demanding construction quality requirements imposed by the safety engineers.

http://www.theecologist.org/blogs_and_comments/Blogs/2605273/unconstructable_hinkley_c_could_end_uks_nuclear_dream.html
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Steven Chu warns UK its n...