Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OhioChick

(23,218 posts)
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 12:08 AM Nov 2014

Cleveland Police: Incident where officer shot & killed 12-year-old boy caught on surveillance video

Source: Newsnet5.com

5:17 PM, Nov 22, 2014

CLEVELAND - The incident in which a 12-year-old boy was shot and killed by a Cleveland Police officer was captured on surveillance video, according to the police.

The Cuyahoga County Medical Examiner's Officer has identified the child as Tamir Rice, 12, of Cleveland.

Cleveland Police Patrolman Association president Jeff Follmer said the boy died at the hospital early Sunday morning.

The Cleveland Division of Police Use of Deadly Force Investigation Team is investigating the officer-involved shooting that happened on Saturday at about 3:30 p.m. at Cudell Recreation Center located at 1910 West Blvd.

Read more: http://www.newsnet5.com/news/local-news/oh-cuyahoga/12-year-old-boy-in-serious-condition-after-being-shot-at-cudell-recreation-center-on-west-side

127 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cleveland Police: Incident where officer shot & killed 12-year-old boy caught on surveillance video (Original Post) OhioChick Nov 2014 OP
Good. GGJohn Nov 2014 #1
Self defense of a Child in a playground FreakinDJ Nov 2014 #27
but, but he had a weapon! noiretextatique Nov 2014 #91
But, but, he did. GGJohn Nov 2014 #92
Wrong, This is not hostile intent pasto76 Nov 2014 #93
especially when the 'weapon' was a BB gun noiretextatique Nov 2014 #96
Wrong, cops don't operate under the same ROE's as the military does. GGJohn Nov 2014 #97
Sorry, military ROE and police use of force aren't comparable Lurks Often Nov 2014 #108
you are ridiculous eom noiretextatique Nov 2014 #95
Wow, what a comeback. GGJohn Nov 2014 #98
Not really... FarPoint Nov 2014 #45
We do know that it was a premeditated act... stone space Nov 2014 #54
i agree samsingh Nov 2014 #80
Actually the toy manufacturer sold it with a bright orange tip... EX500rider Nov 2014 #111
Orange tips are meaningless. stone space Nov 2014 #122
I have a very jaded view of policing in current contexts.... AZ Mike Nov 2014 #101
That sounds like a very fair stance to take. GGJohn Nov 2014 #102
Formerly AZ. AZ Mike Nov 2014 #112
Thanks. GGJohn Nov 2014 #113
Flagstaff.... AZ Mike Nov 2014 #114
You get up this way and look us up, we'll treat you to a sumptuous dinner. GGJohn Nov 2014 #115
Perfect! AZ Mike Nov 2014 #116
Ignore The Lovefest billhicks76 Nov 2014 #118
Huh? AZ Mike Nov 2014 #119
And you felt the need to chime in? GGJohn Nov 2014 #120
Your Obvious billhicks76 Nov 2014 #124
Back atcha buddy. GGJohn Nov 2014 #125
I second that heaven05 Nov 2014 #126
This is good news. branford Nov 2014 #2
then why do you keep doing it? noiretextatique Nov 2014 #10
I have discussed the information that has been released. branford Nov 2014 #19
A good shoot??? PatrickforO Nov 2014 #30
A good shoot in no way means it was not a tragedy, branford Nov 2014 #32
The gun did look real, I'll give it that. PatrickforO Nov 2014 #84
I wish your buddies on the police force would come up with Ilsa Nov 2014 #89
confirmation of an execution("good shoot") heaven05 Nov 2014 #53
branford Feral Child Nov 2014 #68
I second that observation. FarPoint Nov 2014 #38
So I should apply all this course of actiona when I see one of these open carry freaks? pasto76 Nov 2014 #94
I mean everything I've heaven05 Nov 2014 #127
After viewing the Video (seeing the pistol) , even I wouldn't carry that thing around. BlueJazz Nov 2014 #3
Then I suppose the corporation that sold it should be charged. nt valerief Nov 2014 #23
Why should they be charged? GGJohn Nov 2014 #25
You know mercuryblues Nov 2014 #37
In the walmart case, it didn't have the orange tip NutmegYankee Nov 2014 #39
I know mercuryblues Nov 2014 #55
BB guns never have an orange tip. NutmegYankee Nov 2014 #88
See Post #68. Feral Child Nov 2014 #70
Uh Huh. GGJohn Nov 2014 #75
If they can't be charged they should be banned BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #26
At the very least, GGJohn Nov 2014 #28
You know, rainbow colors! BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #106
Yes, a complete redesign is in order with glowing rainbow colors. GGJohn Nov 2014 #107
I enjoyed lawn darts and support the Second Amendment. branford Nov 2014 #29
The orange tip was removed making it unrecognizable as a BB Gun liberal N proud Nov 2014 #44
they should be liable samsingh Nov 2014 #79
Actually, I wonder who allowed (if they did) a 12 year old to visit stores with a replica.. BlueJazz Nov 2014 #86
I think this is what the kid had. valerief Nov 2014 #100
Crap!!! That looks real if you remove the tip. GGJohn Nov 2014 #103
Good. Brigid Nov 2014 #4
This is insane. Killing kids is insane. They have no respect for lives of the public. nm rhett o rick Nov 2014 #5
If the officers' account is truthful, and there apparently is at least one video, branford Nov 2014 #9
911 caller's comments noiretextatique Nov 2014 #13
That info apparently wasn't passed on to the responding officers. GGJohn Nov 2014 #16
That information, even if received by the officers, might not be dispositive. branford Nov 2014 #20
Would you bet your life on "probably"? evirus Nov 2014 #35
This. Starry Messenger Nov 2014 #64
Gun nuts and cop fetishists love this story - the quintessential "good shoot," as these assholes say alcibiades_mystery Nov 2014 #6
Here. let this shithead accomodate you. GGJohn Nov 2014 #7
yeah, yeah, yeah heaven05 Nov 2014 #51
Except that's not what was said nor implied by anyone. GGJohn Nov 2014 #57
Yeah, yeah, yeah heaven05 Nov 2014 #59
There you go making shit up about me again. GGJohn Nov 2014 #60
like I said to your original response heaven05 Nov 2014 #62
You're welcome. GGJohn Nov 2014 #63
Hate begats hate heaven05 Nov 2014 #65
Except I don't live my life hating everything around me. GGJohn Nov 2014 #66
you're only heaven05 Nov 2014 #67
Yeah, Yeah, Yeah, whatever. GGJohn Nov 2014 #69
that's the answer I was looking for!!! heaven05 Nov 2014 #71
You too. GGJohn Nov 2014 #72
For fuck's sake Feral Child Nov 2014 #74
Uh huh. GGJohn Nov 2014 #76
Let's let the record speak: Feral Child Nov 2014 #81
Other than venting, what is you point. branford Nov 2014 #8
what race are they? heaven05 Nov 2014 #61
of course not. this would not happen in a suburb noiretextatique Nov 2014 #14
Why wouldn't this happen in a suburbs? branford Nov 2014 #21
"Why wouldn't this happen in a suburbs?" BumRushDaShow Nov 2014 #36
yup. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #117
I am neither a gun nut or a cop fetisshist as you describe but, current evidence presented shows... liberal N proud Nov 2014 #46
This NEVER would have happened heaven05 Nov 2014 #52
Post removed Post removed Nov 2014 #56
Yeah, I'm sure that's what happened. GGJohn Nov 2014 #58
I agree albino65 Nov 2014 #82
agreed. La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2014 #121
Won't change the outcome. The Courts will protect their own. Cops walk. End of story. blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #11
Suppose the video shows exactly what the cops say actually happened? GGJohn Nov 2014 #12
what if it doesn't? noiretextatique Nov 2014 #15
Absolutely I'll admit I could be wrong. GGJohn Nov 2014 #18
If the video contradicts the officers' accounts, branford Nov 2014 #24
you forgot to respond to post #18 snooper2 Nov 2014 #77
Hopefully the video will show NeoConsSuck Nov 2014 #43
The gun looks real because it is real. It's a bb gun. mackerel Nov 2014 #17
Airsoft vs BB... Oktober Nov 2014 #22
Does the BB gun require a background check to purchase like a Glock? FarPoint Nov 2014 #40
Airsoft isn't the same as a BB gun. NutmegYankee Nov 2014 #41
Hard to believe there are people here who never pocoloco Nov 2014 #73
It is NOT a BB gun TexasProgresive Nov 2014 #47
Did the kid point the gun at the cop? Beaverhausen Nov 2014 #31
The video has not been released. ManiacJoe Nov 2014 #33
The Walmart videos of the August, John Crawford shooting were held by the Attorney General. FarPoint Nov 2014 #42
Shot for reaching for something that the cop can't see? Beaverhausen Nov 2014 #87
No. Shot before the kid actually aimed at the cops. ManiacJoe Nov 2014 #123
Crazy days MFM008 Nov 2014 #34
In the 60s did he point it at cops? jmowreader Nov 2014 #48
yeah, yeah, yeah heaven05 Nov 2014 #50
It behooves responsible black parents heaven05 Nov 2014 #49
good. let's see what the truth really is samsingh Nov 2014 #78
And if it backs the cops story, GGJohn Nov 2014 #83
It will never be "justifiable", Darb Nov 2014 #85
According to reports, he was told to raise his hands, GGJohn Nov 2014 #90
Still not justifiable. The kid did not have a lethal weapon. Darb Nov 2014 #104
What part of the cops didn't have that info don't you understand? GGJohn Nov 2014 #105
Post removed Post removed Nov 2014 #109
Just to be clear, I'm not calling you per se asinine, I'm calling your suggestion that GGJohn Nov 2014 #110
good, because that story where instead of putting hands up boy reached for gun librechik Nov 2014 #99

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
92. But, but, he did.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 12:59 PM
Nov 2014

The cops didn't know it was an airsoft gun, not BB gun, airsoft gun, ergo, he was armed.
We can argue this all day, and neither one of us is going to relent in our opinions, so I'll leave it at that.
You have a good day sir/ma'am.

pasto76

(1,589 posts)
93. Wrong, This is not hostile intent
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:17 PM
Nov 2014

"having a gun" "reaching for a gun" is not justification for lethal force.

You should know that.

Had I done this in Iraq, during the occupation, I would have had an uphill battle justifying my actions. And rightly so.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
96. especially when the 'weapon' was a BB gun
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:34 PM
Nov 2014

as this poster damn well knows. granted, the cops may not, but claiming this kid was "armed," as this poster keeps doing, is disingenuous, at best.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
97. Wrong, cops don't operate under the same ROE's as the military does.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:36 PM
Nov 2014

Reaching for a gun gives cops all the justification they need to use lethal force.

Reaching for a gun isn't hostile intent in this situation? Really?

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
108. Sorry, military ROE and police use of force aren't comparable
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 03:12 PM
Nov 2014

Military ROE is governed quite a bit by politics and the willingness of senior politicians and military officers to lose soldiers rather then upset the host country or risk a some major incident.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
98. Wow, what a comeback.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:38 PM
Nov 2014


It seems we have reached an impasse and further conversation is fruitless at this time.

Please, have a good day, get out and breathe some fresh air, enjoy the day.

FarPoint

(12,368 posts)
45. Not really...
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 07:31 AM
Nov 2014

Mike DeWine will hold all evidence....He held the Walmart tapes in the August John Crawford shooting.... He only let selected individuals review them. He even let the 911 caller watch them to get his story straighten out for the Grand Jury.

Let's see.....

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
54. We do know that it was a premeditated act...
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 08:44 AM
Nov 2014

...on the part of the toy manufacturer.

Somebody needs to go to jail.

And I'd start with the CEO.

EX500rider

(10,848 posts)
111. Actually the toy manufacturer sold it with a bright orange tip...
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 03:25 PM
Nov 2014

...which somebody removed or painted over.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
122. Orange tips are meaningless.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 05:11 PM
Nov 2014

Some folks paint over them, as you pointed out, and other folks paint orange tips on real guns.

I want something much more than just an orange tip distinguishing anything a kid might have in his or her hands from a real gun.

AZ Mike

(468 posts)
101. I have a very jaded view of policing in current contexts....
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:00 PM
Nov 2014

....so it's quite a turnabout for me to accept that perhaps the correct circumstances existed where this cop very well could have "acted in self-defense".

It's a very hard hill for me to climb, but I'll wait this one out and see what the video shows. I can't imagine a 12-year old drawing down in a threatening manner against a cop and I also realize that cops nowadays are generally frightened and trigger-happy, but I'm willing to see how this story unfolds.

AZ Mike

(468 posts)
112. Formerly AZ.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 03:34 PM
Nov 2014

Currently CA.

Born and raised in Phx.

Lived the past 11 years in Maricopa until we moved to Santa Clarita, CA in August.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
113. Thanks.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 03:36 PM
Nov 2014

I was born in and raised in N. CA., now own a spread just outside of Flagstaff. Love it here.

AZ Mike

(468 posts)
116. Perfect!
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 03:58 PM
Nov 2014

My dad & stepmom live up on Hilltop just East of Downtown.

We'll definitely be able to take you up on that one day.

Thanks.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
2. This is good news.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 12:12 AM
Nov 2014

Hopefully the video is clear and captured everything.

Endless conjecture about the events is not productive.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
19. I have discussed the information that has been released.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:14 AM
Nov 2014

However, not knowing all information should not limit all discussion, only conclusions. My personal impressions, like many, was that based only on the information we have, it looked like it probably was a good shoot.

I'm glad that we will apparently now have something objective to either confirm or deny the information thus far, and maybe add more to our body of knowledge. It's good that this video came sooner, rather than later.

We will hopefully soon see if the officers acted properly, if tragically, were negligent in their duties, or were cold-blooded killers.

PatrickforO

(14,574 posts)
30. A good shoot???
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 04:14 AM
Nov 2014

I'm having a hard time believing what I'm reading here. The kid was TWELVE years old!!!

What happened to common sense? Surely the cop could have found a way to end whatever situation was happening without deadly force. What if he was your kid?

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
32. A good shoot in no way means it was not a tragedy,
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 04:49 AM
Nov 2014

simply that the police acted in an appropriate manner. Not every terrible outcome is the result of negligence or malice.

You state that "surely the cop could have found a way to end whatever situation was happening without deadly force," but given the information we know (if true, but the video that should be very informative), I believe it hard to argue that the officers did anything wrong.

In this instance, the police were called to a playground because of a 911 report of someone waving a gun around (there are some reports that the playground was a known gang hangout). The situation is now already serious and potentially very deadly. The police identify a suspect, the boy, with a weapon indistinguishable from a actual firearm. Apparently, someone had removed the orange marker that indicated the gun was not real. The officers properly instruct the boy to put his hands up to mitigate any danger. Rather than comply, the boy inexplicably reaches for the weapon. The police officer shoots to protect himself and other innocents, including children. The officer had to make an immediate decision based only on the information he had available at the time, nothing more.

If the officers' account is true, what would you suggest would have been the right course of action that wouldn't have gambled with the lives of the officers and innocent bystanders, and only knowing what the officers then knew?

PatrickforO

(14,574 posts)
84. The gun did look real, I'll give it that.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:39 AM
Nov 2014

I just think that sometimes the cops shoot before all other ways have been exhausted. The rules of escalation of force that cops use sometimes result in death when ten or fifteen years ago, that wouldn't have been the case.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
89. I wish your buddies on the police force would come up with
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 12:16 PM
Nov 2014

More precise language than using the word "good". There's nothing good about these situations. I'd prefer "justifiable" over a broad term like "good", where the connotation is "more is better".

Another one cops need to bury in a hell pit: "gentleman rapist." There is no such fucking thing as a gentleman rapist. It is deeply offensive to victims, too. It is an attempt to minimize our pain and anger over a vicious violation of our person and spirit.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
53. confirmation of an execution("good shoot")
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 08:22 AM
Nov 2014

is always upheld by you. And while your hiding behind the law does give you biased credence, other people out here know what's been going on in this country, with people hiding behind their biased and racistly applied law and jagged moral boundaries concerning people of color, for generations. You and all of the execution enablers are known for what you are. I bet you would have found some 'lawful' reason for the hanging of Emmett Till. With every shooting that you have responded to looking like a "good shoot" to you, I couldn't be wrong, could I?

Feral Child

(2,086 posts)
68. branford
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:24 AM
Nov 2014

You are an unrelenting police-apologist. You aren't fooling anyone with your "fair and balanced" delivery.

No one believes you.

Like any other "Good Cop-Good Shoot" Preacher-Man, I'm pretty sure that soon your account will be listed as "name removed" and you won't have affected a single opinion here.

pasto76

(1,589 posts)
94. So I should apply all this course of actiona when I see one of these open carry freaks?
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:20 PM
Nov 2014

"he has a gun" - kill him. Cops can do it. why cant I.

What if Im on duty as a national guardsmen, and order an open carry guy to do something and he doesnt. Can I kill him then?

when. the. fuck. did. this. become. ok with people?!

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
127. I mean everything I've
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 02:04 PM
Nov 2014

EVER responded with when it comes to you. You hiding behind a biased and unequal justice system is just as bad as that individual who stands behind a badge and guns and does heinous things to citizens only because they have the state sanctioned power and privilege to do those things

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
3. After viewing the Video (seeing the pistol) , even I wouldn't carry that thing around.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 12:27 AM
Nov 2014

To the average person, it looks VERY real.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
25. Why should they be charged?
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:55 AM
Nov 2014

They did nothing wrong, the airsoft gun was sold with the federally mandated orange tip indentifying it as a fake gun. The manufacterer followed all the laws.

Whoever removed the orange tip is responsible for this tragic death.

mercuryblues

(14,531 posts)
37. You know
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 06:57 AM
Nov 2014

I see many posts about "whoever removed it" post. I have sons. I have bought plenty of fake guns, BB guns, airsoft. Those tips can also break off.

Which makes me wonder about the man that was shot in the Ohio Wal-mart. Did the cop not see the plastic orange tip? He saw the gun, so he had to have also seen the tip? The guy that called 911, didn't he see the orange tip?

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
39. In the walmart case, it didn't have the orange tip
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 07:14 AM
Nov 2014

The orange tip is only for toy guns, which includes the airsoft variety. While airsoft is called a BB gun by the media, it fires a bigger diameter plastic pellet at about 1/3 the velocity as a normal BB gun, which fires a metal projectile. The Airsoft rounds are not intended to puncture skin, though they can leave a welt. For proper play, a face shield protecting the mouth and eyes is needed. Standard BB guns are not ever to be aimed at people because they can puncture skin and in some cases, can kill.


Think of airsoft as a sport much like paintball. The purpose is to get dressed up and run around the woods in a mock war game.

mercuryblues

(14,531 posts)
55. I know
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 08:50 AM
Nov 2014

about the puncture. My youngest son's friend was hit by one, it went into his heart, The kid was 8 or 9 then, very skinny and lucky to survive. He spent almost 2 months in the hospital. That was more of a fluke than the norm.

It was a lesson my kid learned from. Whenever I point out that he is beginning to mishandle his BB, airsoft or fake gun there isn't an argument. I have googled pics of BB and airsoft, it seems there is really no standard for the orange tip. Not all airsoft have it and not all BB's have it. It must be determined by the velocity? Even on most of the ones that have the orange tip, the tip is very small. IMO the tip should be huge and molded with the barrel so it can't be broken off without damaging the gun.

Video games get a lot of flack for encouraging a kid's fascination with guns. What gets overlooked is that we have been at war this kids entire life. Our soldiers are our heroes and kids play war games, they have since I can remember.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
88. BB guns never have an orange tip.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 12:11 PM
Nov 2014

Airsoft always has one when purchased, but these are often removed as they are a dead give-away when playing in the woods. Camo is of no use with a blaze orange tip. Because the airsoft market hinges on realism, manufacturers will never mold a large tip permanently on the "gun" that cannot be hidden/removed. They are almost always painted over or removed.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
28. At the very least,
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 03:42 AM
Nov 2014

the design should be changed so that these airsoft guns can't possibly be mistaken for the real thing and mold them is a color other than black, grey, silver.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
106. You know, rainbow colors!
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:44 PM
Nov 2014

But seriously I remember a child that was shot in California because he had a toy gun in his hand that was red, but it was so dark, the cop could only see the silhouette. So the shape of them needs to be very specific too.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
29. I enjoyed lawn darts and support the Second Amendment.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 03:52 AM
Nov 2014

Nevertheless, "toy" guns should not look like real guns. I'm glad more of these tragic incidents have not occurred.

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
44. The orange tip was removed making it unrecognizable as a BB Gun
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 07:31 AM
Nov 2014

The thing was tampered with. They wanted it to look real, Why would a 12 year old be on the streets in a city with a BB gun that looks like a real gun?

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
86. Actually, I wonder who allowed (if they did) a 12 year old to visit stores with a replica..
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 12:03 PM
Nov 2014

...of a dangerous weapon...in the hands of a youngster.
Sadly, years ago, nobody would have thought that much about it. (look...kid is playing cops and robbers...no big deal)

As for myself, I doubt if I would have given it a second look.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
100. I think this is what the kid had.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:54 PM
Nov 2014
http://www.walmart.com/ip/Whetstone-G.10-Zinc-Alloy-Shell-6mm-Air-Soft-Pistol/20667561

It doesn't have to be brought into stores. It's already there. Besides, Ohio is a Wild West, Anything Goes Open Carry state. Fuck licenses or registrations!

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
103. Crap!!! That looks real if you remove the tip.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:04 PM
Nov 2014

Congress should pass a law mandating that those airsoft guns should be completely redesigned in such a way that they can't possibly be mistaken for a real gun.
Also, paint them in some wild color.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
9. If the officers' account is truthful, and there apparently is at least one video,
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:49 AM
Nov 2014

do you still believe the officers acted inappropriately, and if so, why?

This incident was certainly a tragedy, but thus far there is no evidence that the police did anything but try to properly protect the public and themselves.

If the boy had a real gun and shot people at the playground, I'm confident that many here who have already condemned these officers would be similarly complaining that police negligence and "lack of respect for the lives of the public" were responsible for any injuries and deaths of other children.

I'm beginning to think that to many, being a cop is in itself a crime.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
13. 911 caller's comments
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:59 AM
Nov 2014

"There's a guy in there with a pistol, you know, it's probably fake, but he's like pointing it at everybody," the caller can be heard saying. "He's sitting on a swing right now, but he's pulling it in and out of his pants and pointing it at people," the caller explained. "He's probably a juvenile, you know?"

He mentions that the gun is probably a fake, and the person is probably a juvenile. Cops can't handle anything without shooting these days. He was 12 years old, and black. Of course...his race had nothing at all to do with it. Rinse, Lather, Repeat.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
16. That info apparently wasn't passed on to the responding officers.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:05 AM
Nov 2014

And do we know who the responding officers are? I don't believe that's been released yet.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
20. That information, even if received by the officers, might not be dispositive.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:20 AM
Nov 2014

The gun could still be real (and it certainly looks real from the photos, particularly without the orange plug) and a juvenile is more than capable of killing people, including the officers, with a gun. Many weekends in Chicago will attest to this simple and sad fact.

The most relevant piece of evidence is what actually happened when the officers approached the boy. We apparently have the officers' account, which exonerates them of any wrongdoing, but the video and other evidence will hopefully prove conclusive one way or the other.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
6. Gun nuts and cop fetishists love this story - the quintessential "good shoot," as these assholes say
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:30 AM
Nov 2014

Nobody bothers asking whether the same facts would have produced the same dead kid in some tony suburb, with a twelve year old white boy. Needless to say, whether the gun "looked real" (here comes some shithead with the picture they've been using to spam the board) is of interest to people who already think that twelve year old black kids look scary. "Spittery bluster of course it would happen to a twelve year old white kid dressed head to toe in Gap Kids clothes blah blah blah protocol." Bullshit.

Don't get distracted by the gun nutters and their breathlessly posted pictures. This is about black folks having a shorter life expectancy when white cops are around.

One of these dumbshits is commenting on every thread that mentions this, same routine, over and over. Can't get enough of it. "It really shows what you can do if you have the know-how and the hardware," to quote Michael Herr, ahem.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
7. Here. let this shithead accomodate you.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:41 AM
Nov 2014


Sure looks real to me.

If you don't like the routine, ignore it, really quite simple.
 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
51. yeah, yeah, yeah
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 08:03 AM
Nov 2014

the 12year old deserved to die. He pulled the trigger on his own death. I've read this implication many times here. The victim was responsible for his own death. I get it. Thanks for the accommodation.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
57. Except that's not what was said nor implied by anyone.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:03 AM
Nov 2014

So quit making shit up.
Whoever removed that tip is responsible for this tragic death.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
59. Yeah, yeah, yeah
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:10 AM
Nov 2014

your protest rings VERY hollow. Every time you respond, like some others on here, to the shooting of black people, unarmed and in cases such as this you reveal just what you think and it's not balanced and/or fair minded. In fact it is the exact OPPOSITE. Stop creating BS and obfuscation and I'll stop pointing out your transparency. You don't want the truth from me, .......you have options.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
72. You too.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:32 AM
Nov 2014

Cold day today here in Flagstaff, got to take care of our livestock, feed the chickens, slop the hogs.
The work never ends.

Feral Child

(2,086 posts)
74. For fuck's sake
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:35 AM
Nov 2014

think of your own lines. You're using the valid observation I made of you the other day to shield yourself whenever anyone holds a mirror up to you.



I'll repeat, GGJ: you're transparent, you bring nothing to discussion here except excuses and apologia for killer cops.

Feral Child

(2,086 posts)
81. Let's let the record speak:
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:19 AM
Nov 2014

DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Gun sales surge ahead of ... » Reply #131


Now, which of us speaks the truth, GG?

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
8. Other than venting, what is you point.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:42 AM
Nov 2014

Virtually no one has claimed the shooting was anything but a terrible tragedy. The discussions have primarily concerned whether or not the officers nevertheless acted properly? Issues like whether the gun looked identical to a real firearm is certainly pertinent.

If the video and other evidence and testimony confirms the officers' account of what happened, do still believe the shooting was not justified? What should the officers have done differently knowing what they knew then?

Lastly, do we even yet know the races of either of the involved police officers?

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
61. what race are they?
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 10:16 AM
Nov 2014

do you know? I would bet my last dollars as to what race the shooting officer IS.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
14. of course not. this would not happen in a suburb
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:01 AM
Nov 2014

where the kid was white. as of course, all the usual suspects are claiming they are not supporting the cop's version, and claiming they rest of us should not speculate. it's becoming to sickeningly familiar.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
21. Why wouldn't this happen in a suburbs?
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:26 AM
Nov 2014

You and others repeating it does not make it true. Last I checked, even white suburban cops not only do not want to be shot, but they normally want to protect innocents, including other children and adults at playgrounds, from being shot. A 12 year old with a gun can do a tremendous amount of damage, regardless of their race, religion or any other characteristic.

I and others are not willing to assume wrongdoing on the part of anyone, even if they are police, without actual evidence of some wrongdoing. You might presume people are murders, and you might find the unwillingness of others to do so to be "sickening," but that is how our system works, presumption of innocence, due process, etc.

BumRushDaShow

(128,979 posts)
36. "Why wouldn't this happen in a suburbs?"
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 06:21 AM
Nov 2014

Because white youth are not automatically (and subconsciously) considered "dangerous", armed or not. I.e., the assumption that a 12 year old "with a gun" (or not) at a playground is there for malicious purposes.

If the child looked like this -



the impulse to shoot-on-site wouldn't have occurred despite a "gun-looking" object in her hand.

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
46. I am neither a gun nut or a cop fetisshist as you describe but, current evidence presented shows...
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 07:38 AM
Nov 2014

It was not clear that the gun was a BB Gun. Therefore, if the kid was waving the gun around to prompt a 911 call, then when the officer arrived on the scene, he reached for it pulling it from his waistband as described in current reports. Then boy put his own life on the line. A cop is not going to wait to be shot at if you brandish a gun.

Things like this are why we need stiffer gun laws in this country, so cops don't have to shoot kids with BB guns.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
52. This NEVER would have happened
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 08:08 AM
Nov 2014

to a 12 year old "white kid in a tony suburb" because we all know they're not prone to being violent because of their skin color.....

Response to alcibiades_mystery (Reply #6)

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
121. agreed.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 04:48 PM
Nov 2014

also your message was alerted upon:


On Mon Nov 24, 2014, 03:00 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Gun nuts and cop fetishists love this story - the quintessential "good shoot," as these assholes say
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=951314

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Calling a person showing the gun in question a "shithead" spamming the board is over the top rude and doesn't help at all. This post was fine except for calling others "shitheads" and "dumbshits".

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Nov 24, 2014, 03:09 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: post is PERFECTLY appropriate. LLP
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Dumbass
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I have a problem calling DUers "dumbshits" and "shitheads". Vote to hide.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If the foo shits...
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
12. Suppose the video shows exactly what the cops say actually happened?
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:58 AM
Nov 2014

Will you admit that you could be wrong about this shooting?

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
24. If the video contradicts the officers' accounts,
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:54 AM
Nov 2014

they should be disciplined and/or prosecuted as the facts may dictate.

If the officers' accounts are accurate, will you admit they acted appropriately?

NeoConsSuck

(2,544 posts)
43. Hopefully the video will show
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 07:28 AM
Nov 2014

the orange on the tip of the barrel was removed *before* the shooting.

Sorry, but at my age, I've read too many times of cops planting guns on dead suspects.

mackerel

(4,412 posts)
17. The gun looks real because it is real. It's a bb gun.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:06 AM
Nov 2014

BB guns do cause injury. One of the young men interviewed says that he has a bb gun as do many of their friends. I say this often but where were the parents? I didn't allow my 12 year-old son to go to the park with out an adult present and I never regretted being that strict.

 

Oktober

(1,488 posts)
22. Airsoft vs BB...
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:45 AM
Nov 2014

Distinction is that airsoft shoots small plastic pellets, BBs are what the older folks think of with small metal bearings...

FarPoint

(12,368 posts)
40. Does the BB gun require a background check to purchase like a Glock?
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 07:20 AM
Nov 2014

Since it is real, as you are telling me, I would appreciate you clearing up this confusing concept..

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
47. It is NOT a BB gun
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 07:39 AM
Nov 2014

It is an Airsoft which fires larger plastic rounds not capable of breaking the skin. I have a BB rifle type gun that will penetrate through 3/8 inch plywood. 2 different animals. The media once again shows their ignorance in equating one with the other.

I am not a supporter of the airsoft play or paintball. I bought the BB gun because we were being over run by rats. We have cats outside but they didn't seemed to be doing the job. I shot one rat and it seems that insulted Eddie and we were finding headless rats regularly. So the BB gun has been unused.

Edit to add that I am against any play war using projectile firing weapons. As a child from the city who moved out to the family ranch I frightened my grown uncle with a cap gun. When he realized that it was a toy he said never point it at anyone ever again and if I put them away (I had a matched set) he would train me in the SAFE use of a rifle. The 1st rule is that you never point at anything you don't intend to shoot and you never intend to shoot a person. 2nd it is always loaded, the only exception to this is when it is in pieces on the workbench. There were at least 10 of these rules but those 2 are the most important.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
33. The video has not been released.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 05:07 AM
Nov 2014

But to answer your question, no, the kid did not point the gun at the cops. He was shot before he got to that point.

FarPoint

(12,368 posts)
42. The Walmart videos of the August, John Crawford shooting were held by the Attorney General.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 07:25 AM
Nov 2014

Mike DeWine kept the videos for the police investigation to use in review to get their stories straight. Don't expect these to be released anytime soon.

The John Crawford case was in Beavercreek Ohio near Dayton. Mike DeWne remains attorney general.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
123. No. Shot before the kid actually aimed at the cops.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 05:20 PM
Nov 2014

The normal sequence is:
1. Lift shirt
2. Grab the gun grip
3. Pull gun out of pants
4. Aim gun at target
5. Pull the trigger.

The kid was shot somewhere in steps 2-3, before #4 happened, according to all the articles.

MFM008

(19,808 posts)
34. Crazy days
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 05:08 AM
Nov 2014

in America when we bicker about IF and WHEN its OK to shoot and kill a child not even attempting to use non lethal force. Perhaps manufaturers should not be permitted to make toys so realistic. In the 60s my brother had a pop gun that looked like a pearl handled pistol... he survived childhood.
What days these are indeed.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
50. yeah, yeah, yeah
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 08:01 AM
Nov 2014

the 12 year old deserved to die. I've read that very statement or implication here many times before you.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
49. It behooves responsible black parents
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 07:58 AM
Nov 2014

Last edited Mon Nov 24, 2014, 08:28 AM - Edit history (1)

to NOT let their children play in public areas like a recreation center/playground, with toy guns, if they can be seen by white people. I don't care if the 'orange' safety cone is off or not. Do not let your children play cops and robbers or cowboys and genocide against native-Americans. I'm serious. In this post Trayvon Martin/zimpig murder acquittal time, with the upcoming Michael Brown/darren wilson travesty right over the horizon and the ongoing anxiety surrounding that murder/execution, all black children need to be kept safe from paranoid and or racist citizens(walmart shooting) and police officers. Also, DO NOT let them play in the streets. Please use a lot of logical restraint in activities that can be misconstrued as dangerous black people not showing enough respect to the laws and the 'officers' who uphold those laws. In regard to the paranoid and/or racist citizens, if the child is too small tell them to quickly get away from people like that, otherwise proceed as a person fighting for their right(s) to be recognized as a human being...........

 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
85. It will never be "justifiable",
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 11:51 AM
Nov 2014

It was a fake gun. There is no justifiable reason to kill someone with a fake gun. It was a mistake by the cop and the 911 operator. These days, they don't even have to say "drop the gun", they just shoot to kill.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
90. According to reports, he was told to raise his hands,
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 12:46 PM
Nov 2014

instead, he reached for the gun.
Also, the 911 operator failed to pass along the info from the 911 caller that the gun might be fake, so the officers didn't have that info either.

This was a tragedy all around that shouldn't have happened if someone hadn't removed the orange tip from that airsoft gun.

 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
104. Still not justifiable. The kid did not have a lethal weapon.
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:11 PM
Nov 2014

If he could have done harm to the cops, then it would have perhaps been justifiable, but he could not and it was not.

The cops could have held off from killing him and they would not have been hurt. There is no way that the kid could have hurt the cop. If they had showed just a bit of courage, then the kid would be alive and they won't have to be inconvenienced by a bogus investigation that will exonerate them because the gun fetishists in this country have created a massively paranoid culture, especially in law enforcement.

Thanks, GGJohn, you and those like you are responsible for this ridiculous reality.

"Drop the gun!!". Ahhh, a relic of a bygone era.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
105. What part of the cops didn't have that info don't you understand?
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:15 PM
Nov 2014

Last edited Mon Nov 24, 2014, 03:20 PM - Edit history (1)

You say they should have waited? What kind of an comment is that? Suppose it was real, and at that time, the cops had no reason to believe otherwise, they were supposed to wait until it was drawn and pointed at them?

Response to GGJohn (Reply #105)

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
110. Just to be clear, I'm not calling you per se asinine, I'm calling your suggestion that
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 03:20 PM
Nov 2014

cops have to wait until a gun is drawn on them before they can act.
But just for community peace, I'll edit it out.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
99. good, because that story where instead of putting hands up boy reached for gun
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:43 PM
Nov 2014

is ridiculous. No doubt they'll try to change that before release of tape.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Cleveland Police: Inciden...