Hillary can wait until 2024 or run as an independent.

Hillary is a complete and utter SCAM. GW Bush called her his "sister-in-law" for a reason. She is an actual Trojan Horse controlled by the intelligence community who, for a reason, usually isn't portrayed as the good guys.

but I wish they would not do this. I think they are better at advocating for issues and supporting candidates after the primaries. Of course, they can point out various things, positive or not, about the candidates before the primaries.

I don't support them the way I used to. I think they have gotten too far away from the good things they used to do.

"energized" by this Thing That Won't Happen on ads for the nominee in the home stretch.

With Citizens United, it's going to take a lot of money to beat the GOP.


It's all about the Supremes....

I can think of a LOT of Dems who would be happy to take large sums of corporate money.

Not that I like any of them.

When candidates--and sitting politicians--have to spend more time fundraising than doing constituent services, something's wrong.

They aren't "happy" about it--they just know that if they don't keep up, they'll get outspent and booted by the GOP.

Finally some GOOD news...somewhere on DU is my post about how she has a better astrological chart than Hillary (not to mention she is a much better person)....

i may have to give money as well...

Waiting for somebody to show up to call me a "moran"...

JP Morgan(?)said "Astrology isn't for millionaires, it's for billionaires"...

Just need to take my own advice lol...

announce until after the State of the Union...probably not until April.

see her in the primaries--if nothing else to give Democrats more options and to possibly bring crucial economic topics up. With that said, however, I doubt it would look good for her to change her mind after backing HC to run in 2016 and repeatedly saying she wouldn't run.

The move against the 3rd way is gaining momentum.

It seems they are threatened by the fact that there might be an actual contested primary.

I love Elizabeth Warren. But I would hate to see her get beat up on the campaign trail or during the primary. If she says no, then I respect her decision and won't advocate for her entering the race. Besides, I think she has more influence where she is.

How could being a Senator be more influential than being the leader of the " free world"????

Had a WTF moment for a couple of seconds.

THey should pledge support and $$ to him. Elizabeth Warren could be dragged into the VP once she sees the People want REAL Democrats in office. Later the ticket could be flipped to please the "Let's Make history" faction, if necessary.

If Warren decides to run, I will consider her, but for now I think it's time to get behind Bernie Sanders who is sending clear signals that he does intend to run.

The corporate media is very very good at demonizing any group outside the bubble. IMO this is like an endorsement by Acorn. A great organization, but a name that has been poisoned by the MSM forever. Like Media Matters is demonized on Fox News as simply a far left hit job that lies. And because of Fox's reach and influence, other networks shy away as well. MoveOn's endorsement unfortunately won't help if she is lambasted at every opportunity as the far left's first choice because of it.

clearly, they won and we are helpless before them.
And if ACORN could endorse, how would that be harmful?
do you think the ignorant will automatically have the last say?
and silence or deference to their menacing powers is a better approach?



seriously.