Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 05:51 PM Dec 2014

Assemblyman Michael Cusick Leads Democratic Pack for Grimm Seat: Sources

Source: New York Observer

Assemblyman Michael Cusick—a Democrat who has eyed a Congressional run in the past but has never jumped into the fray—is emerging as a front-runner for the party’s pick in a special election to replace Congressman Michael Grimm, sources told the Observer.

“It’s always been Cusick,” one Staten Island Democratic insider said this morning.

Mr. Grimm, a Republican, announced late last night he would step down January 6 from his post after pleading guilty to a single count of felony tax evasion. He will be replaced in a special election.

Democrats have long identified Mr. Cusick as a strong contender for the seat. He represents the borough’s Mid-Island area, which something of a swing district and where he has remained very popular. He won his last re-election with nearly 60 percent of the vote in the far-flung district, which includes slivers of the South Shore and a few pockets of the North Shore.

Read more: http://observer.com/2014/12/assemblyman-michael-cusick-leads-democratic-pack-for-grimm-seat-sources/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Assemblyman Michael Cusick Leads Democratic Pack for Grimm Seat: Sources (Original Post) brooklynite Dec 2014 OP
I would have a hard time voting for an anti-choice Democrat. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #1
An anti-choice Republican would be better? brooklynite Dec 2014 #2
Well I will vote for the nominee. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #3

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
2. An anti-choice Republican would be better?
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 05:55 PM
Dec 2014

Bear in mind that "pro-life" does NOT mean "anti-choice". Like Senator Casey, you can be philosophically pro-life but not vote to restrict choice.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Assemblyman Michael Cusic...