Sri Lanka's Rajapaksa suffers shock election defeat
Source: BBC
Sri Lanka's long-time leader Mahinda Rajapaksa has been defeated in the presidential election.
Official results showed Maithripala Sirisena, a former ally of the incumbent, had won 51.3% of the vote.
Mr Rajapaksa, in office since 2005, said on Twitter he looked forward to a peaceful transition of power.
His supporters credit him with ending the civil war and boosting the economy, but critics say he had become increasingly authoritarian and corrupt.
Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-30738671
Article says part of the shock is that the incumbent (who had the constitution changed to get rid of a 2 term limit) didn't have the election fixed.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,322 posts)"People think it was a peaceful transition. It was anything but," leading presidential aide Mangala Samaraweera told a press conference.
Mr Rajapaksa's spokesman has said that the allegations are baseless.
...
But Mr Samaraweera told reporters on Sunday that Mr Rajapaksa had in fact attempted to persuade army and police chiefs to help him stay in power - if necessary with the use of force.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-30769188
bemildred
(90,061 posts)I was surprised he went so easily. Now we find out he did not. It sounds like he pulled a Romney and thought he had it in the bag.
Response to bemildred (Reply #3)
bemildred This message was self-deleted by its author.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)The defeat of the incumbent Sri Lankan president Mahinda Rajapaksa in the presidential election on Thursday was neither completely unexpected nor was inevitable, as the narrow victory of his opponent Maithripala Sirisena testifies. But its significance is nonetheless far-reaching.
What happened may not have the look of a classic regime change color revolution as in Georgia or a coup as in Ukraine because the transition adhered to democratic principles, but without doubt outside powers had got involved discreetly (without being visible) and choreographed the rebound of party politics in Sri Lanka.
The success of that unspoken enterprise will ultimately need to be measured in terms of the policies (and their sustainability) that the Sirisena government is likely to pursue in the coming period. Given that countrys complex external environment, the contradictions in its political economy and of course Sri Lankas robust democratic traditions, the best-laid plots by outsiders can go awry.
In a manner of speaking, after the decade-long Rajapaksa era, Sri Lanka is once again becoming a normal country a vivacious democracy that got brutalized in civil war, but refused to go under.
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2015/01/12/lankan-transition-resets-indian-ocean-politics-i.html