No?

They describe how the biggest early losses were in male-dominated industries, and this occurred before January 2009, when Obama took office. Romney and his friends are looking only at net jobs lost since that date--and refusing to acknowledge that even the vast majority of post 1/09 losses are attributable to pre-Obama administration actions and inactions.

Looks like I need to look closer to tear apart the argument.

Gee are they trying to say government spending on teachers should not have been cut? I'd like to hear them be more full throated on that argument.

A lot of Public employees are women... Republicans have been very good at cutting Government jobs....and not producing any priovate jobs as an offset..

This was CBS Farce the Nation

accurate", when in fact they are a classic case of lying and misleading with a deliberate cherry-picking (and worse) of statistics.

On the one hand, it was manufacturing and construction, predominantly male occupations, that took the first hit in this recession. It only follows naturally that the "service" jobs would follow as state and local governments slash programs such as teachers, etc.

But on the other I call foul on Timothy Geithner. He is a Wall Street hack that should NEVER have been appointed to his position. He is exactly the opposite of what we need. Good God this is like putting the wolf in charge of the hen house. I have nothing good to say about him and about Obama's decision to name him to this position.