Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 07:35 AM Jan 2015

UPDATE: Preliminary tests on soldier found dead negative for Ebola virus

Source: Army Times

UPDATE: Results of Initial tests on the Texas soldier found dead are negative for the Ebola virus, Fort Hood officials announced Tuesday evening. A more conclusive test is being conducted to confirm the preliminary findings.

A Fort Hood, Texas, soldier found dead outside his residence in nearby Killeen on Tuesday returned from duty in West Africa less than a week ago, but "there is no indication of the Ebola virus disease," base officials said.

The soldier, who has not been identified, was granted emergency leave from the 21-day quarantine (Defense Department officials call it "controlled monitoring&quot for family reasons, Fort Hood spokesman Tyler Broadway said. The soldier had been reporting his medical status twice daily to medical officials during his leave.

The soldier was one of 87 troops who returned Jan. 7 to Fort Hood after serving in Liberia since October in support of Operation United Assistance.

Read more: http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/2015/01/13/-fort-hood-controlled-monitoring-africa-liberia/21701709/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UPDATE: Preliminary tests on soldier found dead negative for Ebola virus (Original Post) jakeXT Jan 2015 OP
How reliable are those preliminary tests? leftynyc Jan 2015 #1
The autopsy will probably show it. jakeXT Jan 2015 #2
I was just wondering if there was leftynyc Jan 2015 #3
Tough for trauma doctors to miss a "bullet hole". Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #5
Just 3 months ago the entire mass media would have descended on the base and ran with another Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #4
Huh? If he had Ebola he wouldn't have just died quietly. SheilaT Jan 2015 #6
Good point. jwirr Jan 2015 #7
 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
1. How reliable are those preliminary tests?
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 08:27 AM
Jan 2015

I read the article but saw nothing about a cause of death.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
4. Just 3 months ago the entire mass media would have descended on the base and ran with another
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 10:30 AM
Jan 2015

example of Fearbola!

And today we barely have mention of it.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
6. Huh? If he had Ebola he wouldn't have just died quietly.
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 11:59 AM
Jan 2015

People with Ebola are VERY sick, vomiting, diarrhea, bleeding.

And until the virus has multiplied enough for a person to have symptoms, there's absolutely no chance anyone else can get it. Which means, I think, early testing of someone who really has been exposed and is going to get sick from Ebola, probably won't show anything. And in any case, weren't those soldiers not actually working with Ebola patients?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UPDATE: Preliminary tests...