Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Suburban Warrior

(405 posts)
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 10:31 AM Aug 2014

The punditry vs. the presidency

Excellent editorial in the New York Daily News:

There is a fun foreign policy game making all the rounds in Washington D.C. this summer: Pin the tail on Barack Obama.

Its appeal is not hard to understand; it's so easy to play.

Step 1: Pick a foreign crisis that touches even slightly on U.S. national security interests. This shouldn't be hard, because the United States defines practically everything in the world as being an American interest.

Step 2: Make clear that this is no garden-variety problem but rather "the defining crisis of [OBAMA'S] presidency," or a threat to the "very foundations of global order" or the answer to the question, "is this how World War III begins."

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/punditry-presidency-article-1.1921882

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The punditry vs. the presidency (Original Post) Suburban Warrior Aug 2014 OP
The author left out the final step. cheapdate Aug 2014 #1

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
1. The author left out the final step.
Sun Aug 31, 2014, 04:46 PM
Aug 2014

Step 7. Extrapolate catastrophic and existential consequences of Obama's muddled leadership into the dark future ahead. Eg - "the president's lack of strong leadership in (Syria/Iraq/Iran/Ukraine) has emboldened (China/Russia/ISIL) to encroach on American interests everywhere in the world."

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The punditry vs. the pres...