Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 09:58 PM Sep 2014

Israel's Worst-Kept Secret

Is the silence over Israeli nukes doing more harm than good?

Douglas Birch and R. Jeffrey Smith Sep 16 2014

Israel has a substantial arsenal of nuclear weapons.

Former CIA Director Robert Gates said so during his 2006 Senate confirmation hearings for secretary of defense, when he noted—while serving as a university president—that Iran is surrounded by “powers with nuclear weapons,” including “the Israelis to the west.” Former President Jimmy Carter said so in 2008 and again this year, in interviews and speeches in which he pegged the number of Israel’s nuclear warheads at 150 to around 300.

But due to a quirk of federal secrecy rules, such remarks generally cannot be made even now by those who work for the U.S. government and hold active security clearances. In fact, U.S. officials, even those on Capitol Hill, are routinely admonished not to mention the existence of an Israeli nuclear arsenal and occasionally punished when they do so.

The policy of never publicly confirming what a scholar once called one of the world’s “worst-kept secrets” dates from a political deal between the United States and Israel in the late 1960s. Its consequence has been to help Israel maintain a distinctive military posture in the Middle East while avoiding the scrutiny—and occasional disapprobation—applied to the world’s eight acknowledged nuclear powers.

But the U.S. policy of shielding the Israeli program has recently provoked new controversy, partly because of allegations that it played a role in the censure of a well-known national-laboratory arms researcher in July, after he published an article in which he acknowledged that Israel has nuclear arms. Some scholars and experts are also complaining that the government’s lack of candor is complicating its high-profile campaign to block the development of nuclear arms in Iran, as well as U.S.-led planning for a potential treaty prohibiting nuclear arms anywhere in the region.

more...

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/09/israel-nuclear-weapons-secret-united-states/380237/
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Israel's Worst-Kept Secret (Original Post) Purveyor Sep 2014 OP
Mums the word libodem Sep 2014 #1
If Israel has 300 nukes, and of unknown quality or capacity, why are they allowed to keep it secret, Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #2
It's anti-Semitic to order Israel to give up it's nuclear arms but OK Larkspur Sep 2014 #3

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
2. If Israel has 300 nukes, and of unknown quality or capacity, why are they allowed to keep it secret,
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 11:07 PM
Sep 2014

enough to destroy a planet?

Hush is the word when Israel then pounds the table when Iran dares to dream about having even one.


It is called lack of credibility, which always "complicates the position....". Hypocrisy is like that.

 

Larkspur

(12,804 posts)
3. It's anti-Semitic to order Israel to give up it's nuclear arms but OK
Wed Sep 17, 2014, 12:02 AM
Sep 2014

to order Iran and any Arab or Muslim state to give up their nuclear ambitions.



Personally, no one should have nuclear weapons. They are too costly to build, maintain and use.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Israel's Worst-Kept Secre...