Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 03:11 PM Oct 2014

Amazon Workers Take Security-Line Woes to Supreme Court

By Spencer Soper, Sophia Pearson and Greg Stohr Oct 6, 2014

Jesse Busk spent a 12-hour shift rushing inventory through an Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) warehouse in Nevada to meet quotas. His day wasn’t over, though.

After clocking out, Busk and hundreds of other workers went through an airport-style screening process, including metal detectors, to make sure they weren’t stealing from the Web retailer. Getting through the line often took as long as 25 minutes, uncompensated, he and others employed there say.

“They did it on my time,” Busk, 37, of Henderson, Nevada, said in an interview. “If people are stuck in your building and they’re not allowed to leave, why don’t you go ahead and pay them?”

Those allegations are now before the U.S. Supreme Court in a case that could help redefine companies’ reach over hourly workers. On Wednesday, the top court will hear arguments related to a suit brought by Busk seeking compensation for his time in the security lines.

Busk’s December 2010 lawsuit, against a temporary staffing agency that provided workers to Amazon, was among the first to challenge the screening practice. Since then, a dozen similar suits have been filed involving Seattle-based Amazon, and more against other retailers.

more...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-10-06/amazon-workers-take-security-line-woes-to-supreme-court.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Amazon Workers Take Security-Line Woes to Supreme Court (Original Post) Purveyor Oct 2014 OP
If the policy is important enough for it to be followed Sherman A1 Oct 2014 #1
Absolutely! Plus the company does benefit financially from that time, reducing product loss, so freeplessinseattle Oct 2014 #2
My guess is that this job involves a time clock - TBF Oct 2014 #3
Supremes rule - no pay Kilgore Dec 2014 #4

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
1. If the policy is important enough for it to be followed
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 03:33 PM
Oct 2014

then it is important enough for the employees to be paid while following it.

This is nothing more than wage theft.

freeplessinseattle

(3,508 posts)
2. Absolutely! Plus the company does benefit financially from that time, reducing product loss, so
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 05:37 PM
Oct 2014

it only makes sense to compensate the employees for stealing time from them! Bezos is an ass.

TBF

(32,060 posts)
3. My guess is that this job involves a time clock -
Mon Oct 6, 2014, 07:46 PM
Oct 2014

they should be punching out AFTER that line/search on their way out the door.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Amazon Workers Take Secur...