Pentagon Review Says America's Nukes Are FUBAR
Pentagon Review Says America's Nukes Are FUBAR
The guys babysitting our missiles in Montana couldn't agree more.
By Josh Harkinson | Thu Nov. 13, 2014 9:59 PM EST
UPDATED 11/14/14 at 10:32 a.m. PST.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is ordering a massive overhaul of America's nuclear weapons program after finding that "we've taken our eye off the ball," he said at a press conference on Friday morning. The Pentagon released a review of the nuclear forces that found outdated equipment, weak leadership, and abysmal morale among the men and women responsible for maintaining and launching some of the most destructive weapons on the planet. It found, for example, that the Air Force had only one wrench to attach and remove nuclear warheads on 450 ICBMs at three different bases. Maintenance officers would FedEx it among the bases.
The wrench fiasco, since remedied, "is reflective and indicative of a system that has been allowed to slowly back downhill," Hagel said. "We must change the culture of the nuclear force, especially in the Air Force."
The review of the nuclear program was led by Retired General James Welch, a former top nuclear commander whom the Pentagon has tapped repeatedly to assess problems with its nuclear oversight. In 2007, Welch also led the initial outside review of what remains the worst nuclear weapons scandal in recent years: Six nuclear missiles went missing for 36 hours after a crew at Minot Air Force Base mistakenly loaded them onto a plane and flew them across the country. (See our timeline: "That Time We Almost Nuked North Carolina." Welch later directed two follow-up assessments in April 2011 and April 2013, the last of which noted improvements and concluded that "the nuclear force is professional, disciplined, committed and attentive to the special demands of the mission."
But that conclusion was quickly called into question by a string of new scandals, as detailed in "Death Wears Bunny Slippers," my recent feature story about the ICBM program. In the months following Welch's review, 98 missileers were implicated in a cheating scandal and nine midlevel commanders were fired; a leaked email from the commander of the nuclear missile wing at North Dakota's Minot Air Force base complained of "rot" in the missile force; and Gen. Michael Carey was removed as commander of the ICBM program after an official trip to Russia, where he engaged in "inappropriate behavior," including heavy drinking, rudeness to his hosts, and associating with "suspect" women. Just last week, the Air Force fired two high-level commanders in the ICBM program and disciplined a third for various leadership lapses, including the maltreatment of subordinates.
<snip>
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)We've proven we can completely obliterate a nation with just sanctions and some conventional bombs. We don't need nukes
Stargazer09
(2,132 posts)Russia and China are NOT neglecting their nuclear weapons. We need to remember why we have the damned things. Deterrence only works when the enemy is confident that we can strike back, that we are actually capable of dishing out "mutually assured destruction."
In the Air Force, it's a well-known fact that working in the nuclear field is a career-killer. (I don't know how the Navy treats their nuclear people.) Nobody in the AF respects nukes, so why should people care about their jobs or careers? Most of the people stuck in those career fields just don't give a damn anymore, and that's why we see all of the problems detailed in the article. For the record, I don't blame them. Their leadership hasn't tackled the real issues behind this decline, because none of the military generals reached that rank by way of working in the missile silos. They don't understand the nuclear mission, they don't understand the reasons for its existence, and they don't want to deal with the headaches it causes. So they try to sweep all of it under the rug and pretend it doesn't exist.
The vast majority of Americans don't understand why we still need to have a nuclear deterrence force in this day and age. The Cold War is officially over, right?
Sadly, the threat is still there.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)And probably more than a few heavy drinkers in charge there as well.