Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 04:07 AM Dec 2014

Fire at Belgian Nuclear Reactor; Cracks in Pressure Vessels & Oil Leak

http://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2014/12/01/fire-at-belgian-nuclear-reactor-cracks-in-pressure-vessels-oil-leak/

Fire at Belgian Nuclear Reactor; Cracks in Pressure Vessels & Oil Leak
Monday Dec 1, 2014

There was a fire at the French owned Belgian Tihange 3 nuclear reactor. The real news, however, is that three others are offline – two due to serious safety concerns.

<snip>

Tests indicated that material similar to that found in the Doel 3 and Tihange 2 reactor pressure vessels “was more strongly affected by radiation than predicted by theoretical models“! Thus, apparently because the regulator is doing their job, they are offline. http://www.fanc.fgov.be/fr/news/doel-3/tihange-2-fanc-and-bel-v-decide-on-review-process/715.aspx

Huh? Whose “theoretical model”? These are old reactors which were completed in 1982 and 1983 and neutron bombardment degrades the materials which make up nuclear reactors at a faster rate than would normally occur. This is the reason that nuclear reactors were licensed for a fixed period of time.

<snip>

Here is the frightening kicker! Electrabel (i.e. GDF-Suez) was unhappy with the findings and apparently wants to keep testing and manipulating how the data is evaluated to prove what they want to prove – i.e. that the reactor pressure vessels are ok, when they clearly are not:

<snip>

An expert evaluation team is being brought in. http://www.fanc.fgov.be/fr/news/doel-3/tihange-2-fanc-and-bel-v-decide-on-review-process/715.aspx It appears that the experts were brought in by the regulator to act as an arbiter to keep GDF-Suez from (seemingly) trying to manipulate the data until it gets what it wants, though it could be the opposite.

<snip>

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fire at Belgian Nuclear Reactor; Cracks in Pressure Vessels & Oil Leak (Original Post) bananas Dec 2014 OP
I'm sure it will all be fine RobertEarl Dec 2014 #1
Me too - because it never happened FreakinDJ Dec 2014 #2
Yep RobertEarl Dec 2014 #3
" Pretty much all nukes are like bananas" dixiegrrrrl Dec 2014 #4
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
1. I'm sure it will all be fine
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 04:19 AM
Dec 2014

Nothing to worry about. Belgium is not a third world country like Japan with its nasty little Fukushima. And who doesn't like Belgian waffles?

There is no immediate danger. If there was we'd all be dead.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
3. Yep
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 05:00 AM
Dec 2014

Nothing to worry about: Nukes are perfectly safe.

As long as the pumps keep running they can cool down any reactor. And all they need, besides working pumps, is lots of electricity to keep the pumps running. I am sure they will get power to the pumps in no time.

Of course if the tanks of water around the rectors leak water and they can't keep water on the reaction to keep it from overheating and blowing up like Fukushima, then there would be an immediate danger.

Otherwise nukes are safe. Pretty much all nukes are like bananas, so I've been told.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
4. " Pretty much all nukes are like bananas"
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 06:46 AM
Dec 2014

You are correct.
I ran out of bananas the other day and had to use nuke slices on my cereal, and nothing happened to me, so there is proof. right there.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Fire at Belgian Nuclear R...