Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 01:10 AM Dec 2014

Refusing to Take Sides, NPR Takes Sides With Torture Deniers

12/12/2014

National Public Radio, following the lead of the Washington Post (FAIR Blog, 12/9/14) (and in contrast to the New York Times–FAIR Blog, 8/8/14), tries to avoid applying the word "torture" in its own voice to the tortures described in the recent Senate Intelligence Committee report. Here's host Robert Siegel (All Things Considered, 12/9/14):

In the years after 9/11, the CIA conducted harsh interrogations, more brutal and widespread than many realized. And worse, those interrogations did not produce any intelligence that we could use in any significant way to fight terrorism. Those are the conclusions of a report partially released today by the Democratic chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee. Reactions to what's known as the torture report show a country divided.

NPR correspondent Tamara Keith went on to refer to Sen. Dianne Feinstein discussing "a CIA program that used techniques she says amounted to torture." In her own words, Keith reports that "the CIA program of secret overseas detentions and so-called enhanced interrogation methods began shortly after the September 11 attacks."

Soon enough, "so-called" becomes just what they're called. Says Keith: "The key finding: These enhanced interrogation methods didn't make America safer." When a critic of the report, CIA director John Brennan, is introduced, NPR describes the torture whose benefits he touts as "these interrogations."

http://fair.org/blog/2014/12/12/refusing-to-take-sides-npr-takes-sides-with-torture-deniers/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Refusing to Take Sides, NPR Takes Sides With Torture Deniers (Original Post) Jefferson23 Dec 2014 OP
i can't listen barbtries Dec 2014 #1
I stopped listening to NPR imthevicar Dec 2014 #2
National Pathetic Radio Faryn Balyncd Dec 2014 #3
This, now, is the true measure of the cowardice of our "elites". bemildred Dec 2014 #4
NPR has so many people hoodwinked into thinking they are STILL balanced or liberal. world wide wally Dec 2014 #5

barbtries

(28,810 posts)
1. i can't listen
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 04:11 AM
Dec 2014

to NPR's political coverage anymore. it's owned just like the rest of corporate media. probably more insidious because so many people think it really is fair and balanced.

Faryn Balyncd

(5,125 posts)
3. National Pathetic Radio
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 06:32 AM
Dec 2014


It is quite sad, especially remembering the days when they had responsible journalism instead of their current pseudo-"centrist" RW propaganda. (And pseudo-"centrist" RW propaganda from NPR is perhaps more dangerous than that from sources which are openly recognized as RW demagogues.)








bemildred

(90,061 posts)
4. This, now, is the true measure of the cowardice of our "elites".
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 09:31 AM
Dec 2014

That they are afraid to call torture a crime.

world wide wally

(21,754 posts)
5. NPR has so many people hoodwinked into thinking they are STILL balanced or liberal.
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 01:29 PM
Dec 2014

They put an end to that during those "glorious" Bush days for those who haven't noticed that you are being manipulated.
How about a name change to NPF? National Public Fox (in the henhouse)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Refusing to Take Sides, N...