Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
GAO: FBI’s Anthrax Investigation Flawed and Inaccurate
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/12/government-fbis-anthrax-investigation-flawed-inaccurate.html
Government: FBIs Anthrax Investigation Flawed and Inaccurate
Posted on December 23, 2014 by WashingtonsBlog
No Firm Link Between the Mailed Anthrax Spores and a Sample Taken from Ivins Lab
CBS News Baltimore reports:
The journal Science notes:
Indeed as weve demonstrated in hundreds of articles the FBI had no real case against Ivins to begin with.
Government: FBIs Anthrax Investigation Flawed and Inaccurate
Posted on December 23, 2014 by WashingtonsBlog
No Firm Link Between the Mailed Anthrax Spores and a Sample Taken from Ivins Lab
CBS News Baltimore reports:
Flawed and inaccurate. Thats what a 77-page report from the government calls the FBIs research to investigate a series of anthrax attacks.
***
Years into the investigation, the FBI honed in on Army biodefense expert Bruce Ivins. Colleagues at the University of Maryland traced the anthrax spores used in the letters back to a flaskone Ivins had primary access to.
The FBI used what scientists found at the University of Maryland to seal their cases against him, but in 2008just days before he was going to be indictedthe Fort Detrick scientist killed himself.
Now, new research states theres no firm link between the mailed anthrax spores and a sample taken from Ivins lab in Maryland.
***
The (U.S. Government Accountability Office) says the FBIs research did not provide evidence of the methods and conditions used to differentiate between samples of anthrax bacteria and they say that is a key scientific gap.
The journal Science notes:
The 2011 [U.S. National Academy of Sciences] review concluded that the science behind the investigation could not rule out the possibility that someone other than Ivins committed the crime. Last weeks study, from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), comes to a similar conclusion.
Indeed as weve demonstrated in hundreds of articles the FBI had no real case against Ivins to begin with.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1916 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GAO: FBI’s Anthrax Investigation Flawed and Inaccurate (Original Post)
bananas
Dec 2014
OP
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)1. I won't say it.
demigoddess
(6,644 posts)2. does the FBI get anything right???
Trillo
(9,154 posts)3. Now the prohibitions against suicide begin to make sense.
It's an anti-litigation strategy. If you are harassed to the point you commit suicide, the harassers can simply say to your family, "They committed suicide and that's illegal, thus we have no liability toward you." It also explains why, in those places where it is legal, it's with the "permission" of a doctor and healthcare professionals.
I sure wish they had taught this legal-motive stuff in elementary school instead of the now mostly-gone Bill of Rights.
Mr_Jefferson_24
(8,559 posts)4. Flawed?
Flawed investigation? How 'bout NON investigation. How 'bout "pin the tail on the dead guy."
Conveniently suicided scientist, Bruce Ivins, was a patsy who had about as much to do with the Anthrax Letters
as Donald Duck.
An unwelcome truth? Perhaps, but the truth nonetheless.
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)5. This just means the frame is still holding.