Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,336 posts)
Thu Feb 5, 2015, 12:25 PM Feb 2015

The Shock of Schiaparelli

The Shock of Schiaparelli



Elsa Schiaparelli made women feel beautiful, daring and independent—by convincing them to wear insect jewelry, clown prints and shoes on their heads. Schiaparelli (pronounced “skap-a-reli”) routinely made headlines in the 1920s and ’30s, overshadowing rivals like Coco Chanel. Many Schiaparelli designs were so avant-garde that they still have the power to shock, and contemporary designers continue to riff on her work today.

And yet, despite Schiaparelli’s love of outrageous attire, her clothing was often extremely practical, adopting new technologies like plastic zippers and synthetic fabrics to create garments that made women chic and comfortable. She was a perfectionist who invented the first bathing suit with a built-in bra, the see-through raincoat, the ladies’ evening jacket and the wrap dress.



. . . . .


By 1939, Schiaparelli had reached her zenith as the leading tastemaker in Paris. At the same time, fascist politicians were on the rise in Italy, Germany, and elsewhere, leading the world to war. Hitler began his invasion of France in 1940, and Schiaparelli’s designs reflected the mood, becoming more conservative in their restrained military colors, wide pockets, and long sleeves. In the face of rumors about her collaboration with enemy forces, Schiaparelli launched her first postwar collection in 1945—but styles had changed, and Schiaparelli had not. People were after a new kind of beauty that didn’t challenge or provoke; they wanted the glamour and excitement of a new feminine silhouette. Fashion was becoming decadent and extravagant again, with frills, bows, and corseting. Now that Surrealism was no longer novel, Schiaparelli’s designs seemed to lack a clear goal, and after the war, the House of Schiaparelli floundered. By the time styles would come back to more challenging, self-confident womenswear, Schiaparelli had quit designing altogether. In early 1954, Schiaparelli presented her final collection.

The Schiaparelli label dropped out of the headlines for the last half century, but in 2014, the House of Schiaparelli reopened its doors at 21 Place Vendôme in Paris, launching new collections designed by Marco Zanini, along with a one-off tribute couture collection by Christian Lacroix. Schiaparelli would likely be unsurprised by the revival of her own brand, for she recognized that a designer’s work had its own existence once out in the world. As she wrote in her 1954 autobiography:
" A dress has no life of its own unless it is worn, and as soon as this happens, another personality takes over from you and animates it, or tries to, glorifies it or destroys it, or makes it into a song of beauty.

Excerpted with permission from Collectors Weekly. See the full article here.

http://msmagazine.com/blog/2015/02/04/the-shock-of-schiaparelli/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
3. Yes. It is as much about modern art as it is about fashion.
Fri Feb 6, 2015, 09:56 AM
Feb 2015

I find that era fascinating. I do a lot of art research and seek out such historical pieces to add to my knowledge base.

When I was at the MFA in Boston for the Goya exhibit, I went down the hall to another exhibit on women's costumes designed for black and white movies during the 30s. What astounded me was how well preserved these costumes were. You saw the actual dress (pants too) and also a scene from the movie it was in, worn by the actual actress in the film. We had my 19 year old granddaughter with us and she was very enthusiastic, which pleased me greatly. I gave her a little tutorial on Goya on the drive into the exhibit and she
was for the first time really engaged in an art museum!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Shock of Schiaparelli