Did the Torture Report Give the C.I.A. a Bum Rap? (by David Cole)
WASHINGTON IN December, when the Senate Intelligence Committee issued its long-awaited report on the C.I.A.s detention and interrogation program, it seemed to confirm what I and many human-rights advocates had argued for a decade: The C.I.A. had started and run a fundamentally abusive and counterproductive torture program. Whats more, the report found that the C.I.A. had lied repeatedly about the programs efficacy, and that it had neither disrupted terror plots nor saved lives.
The report continues to reverberate. Human-rights groups are calling for a special prosecutor to investigate Bush-era officials who authorized torture. The first C.I.A. officer to publicly discuss the practice of waterboarding, who was later imprisoned for leaking classified information, was recently released and says he was the victim of a politicized prosecution. On Wednesday, Poland agreed to pay reparations to two former detainees who were tortured at a C.I.A.-run black site there.
But the principal lesson drawn by countless commentators in the initial news cycle that torture does not work was reached before nearly anyone read the full report and responses by the C.I.A. and the Republican members of the committee. The report and responses amount to 828 pages. Ive now had a chance to read the documents in full. And I suspect the C.I.A. was treated unfairly.
The full story is more complicated, and ultimately much more disturbing, than the initial responses mine included suggested. And because these documents may be the closest we come to some form of accountability, it is essential that we get the lessons right.
More at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/opinion/sunday/did-the-torture-report-give-the-cia-a-bum-rap.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=c-column-top-span-region®ion=c-column-top-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-top-span-region&_r=0