Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
I'd Put Warning Labels On Mutagenic Plants Before GMOs
" ...Once science discovered that new versions of plants could be created much faster than the old way of grafting, by controlling radiation instead of letting nature just create chaos and danger, they began to do it. In 1936, the world was introduced to mutagenesis, a controlled way to bombard a plant with ionizing radiation and get something new. It was wildly successful, over 2,200 varieties of crops in use right now were created using genetic modification - but since it was genetic modification due to mutagenesis it is considered a "conventional breeding technique" and completely allowed in Europe. Enjoy organic food? You are eating a GMO.
What does that tell weird lack of distinction tell us? It tells us that the anti-GMO craze in Europe is a legal issue, not a science one. They picked a completely arbitrary definition in order to include 1990s genetic modification without wiping out almost 100% of the genetically modified crops then in use. It might as well be called an anti-Monsanto law, since companies like BASF and DuPont have rushed to satisfy the market that Monsanto is not allowed to serve by simply going back to less precise genetic modification - mutagenesis.
At Genetic Literacy Project, I discuss the problem with that stance. It's good for DuPont and BASF, of course, Europe has basically used government fiat to ban a competitor, but bad for common sense and public understanding of science on The Continent. GMOs were created because they could be more precise than older techniques while, as a report by the National Academy of Sciences noted, mutagenesis gets a free pass despite the expectation that mutant varieties may possess and generate more unexpected outcomes because of the unpredictable and uncontrollable nature of non-targeted mutations.
..."
Link to short piece: http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/id_put_warning_labels_on_mutagenic_plants_before_gmos-127348
Link to longer piece: http://geneticliteracyproject.org/2014/10/20/mutagenesis-one-way-europeans-wish-it-was-1936-again/
_______________________________
Very interesting take on the matter, IMO.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1179 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'd Put Warning Labels On Mutagenic Plants Before GMOs (Original Post)
HuckleB
Mar 2015
OP
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)1. Another good piece on mutagenesis.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)2. Let's compromise then.
Label both.
Let consumers be informed consumers.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)3. Let's see anti-GMOers advocate for labels for all seed development technologies, then.
Of course, it really won't give anyone any information of value, but at least it would "fair."
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)4. I'm fine with that too.
Label everything, and let consumers decide based on whatever they personally feel is valuable to them.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)5. It would be good to improve our science education, too.
Consumers are rather easily scared into fearing things that are not scary, and giving the halo effect to things that are not particularly safe. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.
Regardless, until the anti-GMO movement demonizes mutagenesis like it does GMOs, well...