Peasant Sovereignty?
http://www.independentsciencenews.org/environment/peasant-sovereignty/In May 2014, the Spain-based international agrarian organization, Grain, reported that small farmers not only feed the world with less than a quarter of all farmland, but they are also the most productive farmers on Earth. For example, small farmers and peasants in nine European countries outproduce large farmers. The productivity of small farms in Europe is at least twice that of big farms. This remarkable achievement is not limited to Europe. Grain says: if all farms in Kenya had the current productivity of the countrys small peasant farms, Kenyas agricultural production would double. In Central America and Ukraine, it would almost triple. In Russia, it would be increased by a factor of six.
The European invasion of the tropics in the fifteenth century, the industrialization of agriculture in the nineteenth century, and the triumph of communism in the twentieth century proved catastrophic for peasant societies. These major events remade the world in the image of Europe. The European colonizers carried with them their mechanized agriculture and their distaste for things agrarian. The British ruling class, for example, confiscated the land of British and Irish peasants, expelling many of them to Australia and to the Americas. This stealing of peasant land is what historians now call enclosure. When the Europeans conquered the tropics, they put into practice enclosures. They confiscated the best land for themselves. They taxed and enslaved the native people by forcing them to grow cash crops for export. The rise of communism had equally devastating effects on peasants in Russia, Eastern Europe, China and Southeast Asia. Communism lasted for most of the twentieth century.
This massive violence against peasant life and rural culture shaped our industrialized agriculture. Its failure today is therefore much more than the poisoning of our food and drinking water and the ecological devastation it sows. The blood of peasants and small family farmers is on the hands of industrialized agriculture. Its failure is thus moral and political as well...
rogerashton
(3,920 posts)The way I read history, the most efficient scale of a farm is the scale best adapted to family farming, which can require fairly extensive landholdings and investment in some circumstances (e.g. west Texas in 2015). But it is hard to find a clear answer to this question in the numbers.
Blue Meany
(1,947 posts)machinery will usually produce more per acre, often much more. This is because agribusiness farms have to lay out fields to accommodate the machinery, which means a lot of the land is wasted between rows. However, traditional farming is more labor intensive then mechanized farming and so it costs more. Capitalists are more concerned about profit than yield. In my garden, I get probably 4 times the yield a commercial farm would get in the same space, but it isn't something I could--or at least would--scale up as a business. It is worth it to have fresh, organic food and because I enjoy spending some time in the garden, but I wouldn't do it for money. I think that it is why some people say that there is no such thing as sustainable agriculture; only sustainable horticulture.