Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,530 posts)
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 04:24 AM Apr 2015

FBI admits it fudged forensic hair matches in nearly all criminal trials for decades

FBI admits it fudged forensic hair matches in nearly all criminal trials for decades
Spencer S. Hsu, Washington Post | April 19, 2015 5:13 PM ET
More from Washington Post

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.

Of 28 examiners with the FBI Laboratory’s microscopic hair comparison unit, 26 overstated forensic matches in ways that favoured prosecutors in more than 95 per cent of the 268 trials reviewed so far, according to the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) and the Innocence Project, which are assisting the government with the country’s largest post-conviction review of questioned forensic evidence.

The cases include those of 32 defendants sentenced to death. Of those, 14 have been executed or died in prison, the groups said under an agreement with the government to release results after the review of the first 200 convictions.

The FBI errors alone do not mean there was not other evidence of a convict’s guilt. Defendants and federal and state prosecutors in 46 states and the District of Columbia are being notified to determine whether there are grounds for appeals. Four defendants were previously exonerated.

More:
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/world/fbi-admits-it-fudged-forensic-hair-matches-in-nearly-all-criminal-trials-for-decades

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FBI admits it fudged forensic hair matches in nearly all criminal trials for decades (Original Post) Judi Lynn Apr 2015 OP
J. Edgar's house has not changed much since his death. bemildred Apr 2015 #1
They only lied about the hair evidence. Never, ever about anything else, right? marble falls Apr 2015 #2
The way this is written misstates the issue. JayhawkSD Apr 2015 #3

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
1. J. Edgar's house has not changed much since his death.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 09:08 AM
Apr 2015

One hoped for a return to some semblance of integrity, but I can see that was too optimistic. One can only feel bad for the honest agents who are painted with the same brush of corruption as the weasels at the top.

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
3. The way this is written misstates the issue.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 11:09 AM
Apr 2015

The FBI made errors. It did not "fudge" the results and it did not knowingly give false testimony in order to convict anyone. It used bad methodology and bad training and produced unrelaible and false results. They do not know how many samples were found not to have matched when, in fact, they did match.

The wording used by the writer of the article, and echoed by the original poster here, tries to imply that the FBI was deliberately truying to convict innocent people. They were not. They were merely incompetent.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»FBI admits it fudged fore...