FBI admits it fudged forensic hair matches in nearly all criminal trials for decades
FBI admits it fudged forensic hair matches in nearly all criminal trials for decades
Spencer S. Hsu, Washington Post | April 19, 2015 5:13 PM ET
More from Washington Post
WASHINGTON The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.
Of 28 examiners with the FBI Laboratorys microscopic hair comparison unit, 26 overstated forensic matches in ways that favoured prosecutors in more than 95 per cent of the 268 trials reviewed so far, according to the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) and the Innocence Project, which are assisting the government with the countrys largest post-conviction review of questioned forensic evidence.
The cases include those of 32 defendants sentenced to death. Of those, 14 have been executed or died in prison, the groups said under an agreement with the government to release results after the review of the first 200 convictions.
The FBI errors alone do not mean there was not other evidence of a convicts guilt. Defendants and federal and state prosecutors in 46 states and the District of Columbia are being notified to determine whether there are grounds for appeals. Four defendants were previously exonerated.
More:
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/world/fbi-admits-it-fudged-forensic-hair-matches-in-nearly-all-criminal-trials-for-decades
bemildred
(90,061 posts)One hoped for a return to some semblance of integrity, but I can see that was too optimistic. One can only feel bad for the honest agents who are painted with the same brush of corruption as the weasels at the top.
marble falls
(57,083 posts)JayhawkSD
(3,163 posts)The FBI made errors. It did not "fudge" the results and it did not knowingly give false testimony in order to convict anyone. It used bad methodology and bad training and produced unrelaible and false results. They do not know how many samples were found not to have matched when, in fact, they did match.
The wording used by the writer of the article, and echoed by the original poster here, tries to imply that the FBI was deliberately truying to convict innocent people. They were not. They were merely incompetent.