Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,080 posts)
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 11:09 AM Apr 2015

A Fact-Resistant ‘Group Think’ on Syria


from Consortium News:


A Fact-Resistant ‘Group Think’ on Syria
April 20, 2015

Exclusive: CBS News’ anchor Scott Pelley is known for his clueless journalism which never goes beyond Official Washington’s “group think” – and he was at it again in a dangerously provocative “60 Minutes” segment on the sarin gas attack near Damascus, Syria, in 2013, reports Robert Parry.


By Robert Parry


On Sunday evening, CBS’s “60 Minutes” presented what was pitched as a thorough examination of the infamous sarin gas attack outside Damascus, Syria, on Aug. 21, 2013, with anchor Scott Pelley asserting that “none of what we found will be omitted here.” But the segment – while filled with emotional scenes of dead and dying Syrians – made little effort to determine who was responsible.

Pelley’s team stuck to the conventional wisdom from the rush-to-judgment “white paper” that the White House issued on Aug. 30, 2013, just nine days after the incident, blaming the Syrian government of President Bashar al-Assad. But Pelley ignored contrary evidence that has emerged in the 20 months since the attack, including what I’ve been told are dissenting views among U.S. intelligence analysts.

The segment also played games with the chronology of the United Nations inspectors who had been invited to Damascus by Assad to investigate what he claimed were earlier chemical attacks carried out by Syrian rebels, a force dominated by Islamic extremists, including Al-Qaeda’s Nusra Front and the even more brutal Islamic State.

Though Pelley starts the segment by interviewing a Syrian who claimed he witnessed a sarin attack in Moadamiya, a suburb south of Damascus, Pelley leaves out the fact that Moadimiya was the first area examined by the UN inspectors and that their field tests found no evidence of sarin. Nor does Pelley note that UN laboratories also found no sarin or other chemical agents on the one missile that the inspectors recovered from Moadamiya. ..................(more)

https://consortiumnews.com/2015/04/20/a-fact-resistant-group-think-on-syria/




2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Fact-Resistant ‘Group Think’ on Syria (Original Post) marmar Apr 2015 OP
the data from the UN points clearly in the direction of the Assad regime. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #1
LOL@Parry...Same old fairy tales, conjecture and minimal sourcing Blue_Tires Apr 2015 #2
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
1. the data from the UN points clearly in the direction of the Assad regime.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 11:58 AM
Apr 2015

Parry is a shameless apologist for Assad as well as Putin.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
2. LOL@Parry...Same old fairy tales, conjecture and minimal sourcing
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 03:34 PM
Apr 2015

I've been asking him on Twitter when he was going to retract some of his more outrageous bullshit, but I've never gotten a response...

Whatever those folks are paying him, it isn't enough...

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»A Fact-Resistant ‘Group T...