Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
A Fact-Resistant ‘Group Think’ on Syria
from Consortium News:
A Fact-Resistant Group Think on Syria
April 20, 2015
Exclusive: CBS News anchor Scott Pelley is known for his clueless journalism which never goes beyond Official Washingtons group think and he was at it again in a dangerously provocative 60 Minutes segment on the sarin gas attack near Damascus, Syria, in 2013, reports Robert Parry.
By Robert Parry
On Sunday evening, CBSs 60 Minutes presented what was pitched as a thorough examination of the infamous sarin gas attack outside Damascus, Syria, on Aug. 21, 2013, with anchor Scott Pelley asserting that none of what we found will be omitted here. But the segment while filled with emotional scenes of dead and dying Syrians made little effort to determine who was responsible.
Pelleys team stuck to the conventional wisdom from the rush-to-judgment white paper that the White House issued on Aug. 30, 2013, just nine days after the incident, blaming the Syrian government of President Bashar al-Assad. But Pelley ignored contrary evidence that has emerged in the 20 months since the attack, including what Ive been told are dissenting views among U.S. intelligence analysts.
The segment also played games with the chronology of the United Nations inspectors who had been invited to Damascus by Assad to investigate what he claimed were earlier chemical attacks carried out by Syrian rebels, a force dominated by Islamic extremists, including Al-Qaedas Nusra Front and the even more brutal Islamic State.
Though Pelley starts the segment by interviewing a Syrian who claimed he witnessed a sarin attack in Moadamiya, a suburb south of Damascus, Pelley leaves out the fact that Moadimiya was the first area examined by the UN inspectors and that their field tests found no evidence of sarin. Nor does Pelley note that UN laboratories also found no sarin or other chemical agents on the one missile that the inspectors recovered from Moadamiya. ..................(more)
https://consortiumnews.com/2015/04/20/a-fact-resistant-group-think-on-syria/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 767 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Fact-Resistant ‘Group Think’ on Syria (Original Post)
marmar
Apr 2015
OP
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)1. the data from the UN points clearly in the direction of the Assad regime.
Parry is a shameless apologist for Assad as well as Putin.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)2. LOL@Parry...Same old fairy tales, conjecture and minimal sourcing
I've been asking him on Twitter when he was going to retract some of his more outrageous bullshit, but I've never gotten a response...
Whatever those folks are paying him, it isn't enough...