How the Media Became One of Putin’s Most Powerful Weapons
ladimir Putin is a news junkie.
The Russian presidents press secretary, Dmitry Peskov, didnt use that expression when we talked by phone, but thats what he described to me: a man at the center of an ever-churning machine processing vast amounts of news and data at his command.
Sometimes were wondering what is the limit for a human being for absorbing this huge amount of information, Peskov told me, but, well, its really a very, very, very heavy job.
Peskov, speaking fluent English, described the operation. First of all, the information and press department of the presidential administration prepares digests on print media, on Internet sources, on domestic mediafederal and regional.
http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2015/04/how-the-media-became-putins-most-powerful-weapon/391062/
I know my usual jousting partners want NO FUCKING PART of THIS story, so it would be best to just let it drop...
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
I've completely dismissed the idea that you might be a paid troll. There's no way anybody would pay you for the results you're getting.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)Although I am currently retired from full-time work in international organizations/affairs, I was reincarnated as an adjunct professor a few years back. Among others, I teach a course in Comparative Politics to international students, several of whom are Russian nationals.
This article should elicit some excellent discussion from my students, especially since one of our comparative topics is how the media influences politics in a given nation and/or vice versa.
I am not sure who your "usual jousting partners" are, but I am with Gore Vidal on what our own mainstream media is:
Any DUers who live in or who visit Washington, DC should visit the Newseum. http://www.newseum.org/
It's a great learning experience.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)One offensive image after another, about one per second. It won't inform you, and it will prevent any attempt at thinking.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)"series of flashing fictions" indeed.
MBS
(9,688 posts)The author is the former Moscow bureau chief for CNN, so knows the journalistic and political landscape well.
A quote from the article that struck a chord:
and this, farther down,
Last November, I met with her at a coffee shop in New York. . . If anyone understands how the Russian press operates, it is Mironyuk. And when we spoke, she was adamant that the perception in the West that the people running Russias media outlets are Soviet-style ideologues is wrong. They have no ideology, she said. Its control, control, control. The only strategy they all have is whatever it takes. No ideology. No strategy. No new approach, no understanding. No, no, no! They are struggling for influence on Putin, for being closer to him.. . . .In the Soviet Union, she explained, at least there were rules. Now, in Russia, there are no rules. You never know where you step and what can happen and what, yesterday, was not a mistake or breaking the rules, it can be tomorrow.
The war in Ukraine has sent Russian domestic TV ratings soaring. Federal channels have increased their news lineupsa half hour, then an hour, and now two hours. The programming has paid off in popularity for Putin; a poll in March by the Levada Center found that 83 percent of Russians trust the president. Yet some Russian journalists question whether that mood can last. The level of propaganda is so disgusting that people who earlier believed in it now are beginning to doubt it, TV Dozhds Sindeyeva told me. This propaganda has begun to do its thing, to unite people around a certain idea that the country has risen from its knees and is strong. But right now, they have made the propaganda so coarse, so clumsy, that people have begun to doubt it. She claimed to have seen data showing a decline in the publics belief in the accuracy of news on Russian TV, and that is the first sign that trust is going to drop. Sindeyeva recalled how, during Soviet times, many people completely lost faith in what they read and what they saw, becoming cynical experts in reading between the lines of propaganda.