Meryl Streep Boosts Over-40 Women Screenwriters
Meryl Streep Boosts Over-40 Women Screenwriters
Back in 1986 Newsweek made a point of suggesting that for all practical purposes, women are dead at age 40. Women over 40, they wrote, are more likely to be killed by a terrorist than get married. And Newsweek had statistics to back it up: Women over 40, they claimed have a minuscule 2.6 percent probability of tying the knot.
What is it about women and age 40?
Well, this month, Meryl Streep is taking a stand against this extraordinary, sweeping discrimination against perhaps Americas most powerful demographic. Streep, who is over 40, fully represents the striking contradiction of female stereotypes. Having worked all her life in Hollywood, she remains always ethereal, always brilliant, always beautiful.
During a panel discussion at the Tribeca Film Festival last Sunday, it was announced that Streep is funding a screenwriters lab for female writers over 40 to begin this year. The lab will be run by New York Women in Film and Television and a collective of women filmmakers know as IRIS. This screenplay development program will be known as The Writers Lab, and will accept submissions May 1-June 1. Eight winners will be named August 1.
This announcement demostrates once again the Streep is a not just a shape-shifting goddess, but a national treasure that keeps on givingto women, to our country, and to our world. Today, when the issue of female exclusion from U.S. media is hotter than ever, she simultaneously ennobled Hollywood and struck a blow at the industry, famous for ageism and sexism.
While almost 90 percent of Hollywoods produced screenplays are written by men, when we look back at some of our worlds greatest films, we see that some of the very best were written by women over 40: Frances Marion was 42 when Anna Christie came out in 1930. Ruth Gordon was 53 for the premiere of Adams Rib. Jay Presson Allen wrote The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie in her late 40s. Lina Wertmuller was 44 when she was nominated for the Oscar for The Seduction of Mimi. Alice Arlen was 43 and Nora Ephron was 41 when Silkwood was nominated in 1983.
. . . .
http://msmagazine.com/blog/2015/04/25/meryl-streep-boosts-over-40-women-screenwriters/
appalachiablue
(41,146 posts)treasure indeed. She looked especially glowing at the last Oscars. Just keeps getting better, a real inspiration. It's very clear that 90% of H.wood film screenplays are written by men. That must change.
malthaussen
(17,204 posts)... is the woman's marketability as a bride. I submit that tells us all we need to know about the article.
-- Mal
niyad
(113,344 posts)not to mention, the stats mentioned in that article were nonsense.
did you ever see this?:
Newsweek's Apology Comes 20 Years Too Late
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
Newsweek has issued a grand correction: Contrary to a cover story 20 years ago, single women over 40 actually do marry. Caryl Rivers says the article was clearly wrong at the time and fed media gospel about the woes of ambitious women.
Bookmark and Share
Caryl Rivers
(WOMENSENEWS)--"We were wrong!"
You almost never see these words on the cover of a major magazine, but on June 5, Newsweek said just that. The magazine headlined, in boxcar type, "20 years ago, Newsweek predicted that a single, 40-year-old woman had a better chance of being killed by a terrorist than getting married."
. . . . .
Newsweek deserves a bouquet for its story. Half the flowers should be roses, for admitting in such a public way that the terrorist story turned out to be utterly bogus. The other half should be stinkweed, because a lot of people knew full well at the time that the notion was laughable. Why did the correction take so long?
Before long, there was hardly a female in the nation who hadn't heard the dire predictions about women who delay marriage. One of Nora Ephron's single women in her 1993 "Sleepless in Seattle" cited the terrorist "fact."
. . . . .
But the man shortage, as Katha Pollitt pointed out in The Nation in September of 1986, was "really an older man shortage, and a temporary one at that."
. . . . .
One reason an obscure demographic study acquired such long "legs" as a news story, Newsweek admits, is that the magazine came up with the catchy "killed by a terrorist" line, which was not in the academic study.
The line was first written as a joke in a memo from correspondent Pamela Abramson.
"It's true; I am responsible for the single most irresponsible line in the history of journalism, all meant in jest," Abramson told Newsweek last week.
. . . .
http://womensenews.org/story/uncovering-gender/060614/newsweeks-apology-comes-20-years-too-late
malthaussen
(17,204 posts)I stopped reading Newsweek a long time ago... I'll ask the same question, though, why did it take 20 years to issue a correction? Why, you'd almost think they didn't regret the story at all.
-- Mal