Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

polly7

(20,582 posts)
Wed May 20, 2015, 09:42 PM May 2015

Hundreds of Tech Companies to Congress: TPP and Fast Track Harms Digital Innovation and Users’ Right

For Immediate Release
Wednesday, May 20, 2015 - 12:30pm
Electronic Frontier Foundation

WASHINGTON - In a joint letter to Congress released today, more than 250 technology companies and user rights organizations say that the extreme level of secrecy surrounding trade negotiations have led to provisions in agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) that threaten digital innovation, free speech, and access to knowledge online, and the letter calls on Congress to come out against the Fast Track, also known as Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), bill for legitimizing this secretive process. Its signatories include AVG Technologies, DreamHost, Namecheap, Mediafire, Imgur, Internet Archive, BoingBoing, Piwik, Private Internet Access, and many others.

The letter specifically identifies the TPP's threats based on leaked texts of the agreement—how it threatens fair use, could lead to more costly forms of online copyright enforcement, criminalize whistleblowing and investigative journalism, and create investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) courts that would further jeopardize user protections in domestic laws. The Fast Track bill, the companies write, would legitimize the exclusive process that has led to these and other provisions, as well as undermine lawmakers' efforts towards striking the right balance between the interests of copyright holders and those of innovators and users.

“We simply cannot allow our policymakers to use secret trade negotiations to make digital policy for the 21st century,” said Maira Sutton, global policy analyst at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. “Leaks of the TPP agreement have revealed time and time again that this opaque process has led to provisions that undermine our rights to free speech, privacy, and innovation online. The TPP is a huge threat to the Internet and its users. Full stop.”

“The future of the Internet is simply too important to be decided behind closed doors,” said Evan Greer, campaign director of Fight for the Future. “The Fast Track / Trade Promotion Authority process actively silences the voices of Internet users, startups, and small tech companies while giving the biggest players even more power to set policy that benefits a few select companies while undermining the health of the entire Web.”


Full article: http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2015/05/20/hundreds-tech-companies-congress-tpp-and-fast-track-harms-digital-innovation-and
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hundreds of Tech Companies to Congress: TPP and Fast Track Harms Digital Innovation and Users’ Right (Original Post) polly7 May 2015 OP
kick 840high May 2015 #1
It is again the innovative small to medium sized companies fighting for their life againt the Faryn Balyncd May 2015 #2
Great post! nt. polly7 May 2015 #4
Net Neutrality itself seems endangered by ISDS claims stuffmatters May 2015 #3
I agree. polly7 May 2015 #5

Faryn Balyncd

(5,125 posts)
2. It is again the innovative small to medium sized companies fighting for their life againt the
Thu May 21, 2015, 03:48 AM
May 2015


...corporate establishment, whose goal is to squeeze the last ounce of profit any way they can, including killing Fair Use, and with it the internet at we know it, and crushing the competition.


Corporate oligarchs are salivating to destroy the internet by the criminalization of Fair Use, just as they destroyed a balanced public media by destroying the Fairness Doctrine.




What the want is not the advancement of science and the public good by encouraging innovation with limited patent protection for a few year (as authorized in the constitution, and the 14 years protection without possibility of extensionj in the Patent Act of 1790.)

No, their goal is the opposite: discourage intervention by extending patent/copyright protection for a century or so after the inventor's death, even for inventions under much less extensive protections, even for those corporations holding copyrights from creators/inventors like Woody Guthrie, who wrote Re: "This Land Is Your Land":



"This song is Copyrighted in U.S., under Seal of Copyright # 154085, for a period of 28 years, and anybody caught singin it without our permission, will be mighty good friends of ourn, cause we don't give a dern. Publish it. Write it. Sing it. Swing to it. Yodel it. We wrote it, that's all we wanted to do."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woody_Guthrie#Copyright_controversy

,





The corporatists goals not only do not align with the goals of those who established copyrights and patents to advance the general welfare and advancement of innovation, they are to do the exact opposite: to maximize monopoly power to discourage competition and innovation in order to squeeze every last drop of profit from the public with the least amount of innovation.

A recent UPS delivery man left a notice from UPS asserting, among other things, that UPS owned the copyright protection for the color "brown. , (just as the writers of the constitution intended!)


They desire to destroy the Fair Use doctrine, or to cripple it into irrelevancy>







If ever there was a time we needed Teddy Roosevelt.






















stuffmatters

(2,574 posts)
3. Net Neutrality itself seems endangered by ISDS claims
Thu May 21, 2015, 05:01 AM
May 2015

I'm having a hard time trying to figure out any consumer, financial or environmental protection that is not endangered by ISDS lawsuits
because all protections, inherently, deplete corps current & " future profits."

polly7

(20,582 posts)
5. I agree.
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:17 AM
May 2015

From environment, to safety nets, pharmaceutical availability, net neutrality, natural resources - it's all going to be endangered by ISDS lawsuits. Mexico and Canada have already seen it, and paid millions - I worry so much about poor nations and those with corrupt gov'ts who will burden this debt onto their citizens who can least afford it. I hate these agreements. From the start they've been nothing but a means to siphon money into multinational corporations, period.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Hundreds of Tech Companie...