Ron Wyden Calls NAFTA Insufficient Now; In 1993, He Called It a “Vote For Less Pollution”
(It's sad that Wyden has been fighting against the NSA Bulk Collection & Patriot Act...but, leading the fight to pass TPA/TPP)
-----------
Ron Wyden Calls NAFTA Insufficient Now; In 1993, He Called It a Vote For Less Pollution
Posted on May 22, 2015 by David Dayen
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/05/ron-wyden-calls-nafta-insufficient-now-in-1993-he-called-it-a-vote-for-less-pollution.html
One of the common rhetorical tropes supporters of the Trans-Pacific Partnership have used to sell it is to declaim all prior trade agreements as inferior, relative to this bright, shiny and new deal. As Senator Warrens staff showed in their report this week, for twenty years trade boosters have called the deal currently on offer the most progressive agreement in history or some similar flourish. When the promises fail to come true, trade supporters bury the past, and assert that this time is different. Ron Wyden, the Democrat in Congress most responsible for moving TPP through expect final passage on fast-track trade authority in the Senate before they leave for Memorial Day recess gave a particularly juicy example of this yesterday.
Speaking on the Senate floor, Wyden engaged in a soliloquy about TPPs environmental and labor protections. And he specifically contrasted them with protections in NAFTA. Let me quote at length; you can watch here, its at around the 7 hour, 37 minute mark:
Our partners will be required to adopt and maintain core international labor standards core international labor standards are going to be required of our trading partners. They will have to adopt them and they will have to maintain them. Thats not something thats to the side and is unenforceable. Thats real. Its got teeth. And also our partners would be required to adopt what are really common multilateral environmental agreements and these would be backed by the threat of trade sanctions.
Weve actually had a lot of trade agreements since NAFTA where labor and environment protections were embedded in the deal; as the Warren report showed, violations were generally not enforced. But lets look past that for a second, along with the incredibly funny shrift joke. Wyden says it was my view that NAFTA side agreements were not good enough. Hmm, I thought Wyden, at that time in the House, was a supporter of NAFTA? He voted for it, in fact.
The Congressional Record is a marvelous thing, because it preserves members floor remarks. So we know what Wyden thought about NAFTA, particularly about those unenforceable side deals. Heres the Congressional Record from November 1993:
I think it is also important that environmental reformers understand that if NAFTA goes down, the rules of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade [GATT] apply and GATT rules are weaker on environmental protection than are the NAFTA standards. That is why it is no accident that the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Environmental Defense Fund, the National Wildlife Federation, and millions of environmentalists are on record supporting this NAFTA.
Vote for cleaner air and water and less pollution in North America; support the NAFTA agreement.
Emphasis mine. To use the technical term, Wyden is a bullshit artist. And when the hype machine around trade deals has been so thoroughly and utterly wrong for twenty years, its entirely reasonable to question whether the new new version also wont live up to the billing.
I also located an interesting clip from the evening of NAFTAs passage in 1993, where Wyden was asked about the effect of securing the trade deal on negotiations with Asia. Its here at around 18:30:
Its almost as if one trade agreement sets the table for the next one!
Credibility is exactly what youll hear if fast track passes and TPP comes up for a vote. Members of Congress will be lectured that opposing TPP will be a diplomatic catastrophe, that a No vote will hurt America. But Im amused by Wydens intoning of a $75 billion deficit with the Asians (it was a different time I suppose). Of course, today we have a $300 billion deficit just with China, and the South Korea free trade agreement only made our deficit worse.
None of this matters in the Senate, where cloture has been invoked on fast track, and Wydens bad messenger status sadly won the day. But the House is a different story. In reporting on this, various members have told me that the bill is either a dead letter in the House, or that the White House would need to flip every undecided and a few declared no votes. On the other hand, Republicans say that they have the votes in hand.
This will likely get a vote right after the House returns from recess on the week of June 1. So its crunch time, and if you feel strongly about this, its worth a call to your Congress-critter, especially if theyre on the fence.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)I am completely mystified by my Senator Ron Wyden. It's disheartening that Nike's vote trumps mine so clearly.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)pa28
(6,145 posts)NAFTA had a provision, a relatively toothless one, that outlined financial penalties and sanctions to nations who did not comply with the agreement.
TPP has no enforcement mechanism at all in the leaked chapter and it's strictly a self policing commitment from signatory nations.
From the leaked environment chapter:
take appropriate measures to protect and conserve wild fauna and flora that are at risk within its territory, including measures to conserve the integrity of designated natural protected areas;20
maintain or strengthen government capacity and institutional frameworks to promote sustainable forest management and wild fauna and flora conservation, and endeavor to enhance public participation and transparency therein; and
endeavor to develop and strengthen cooperation and consultation with interested non-governmental entities in order to enhance implementation of measures to combat the illegal take of or illegal trade in wild fauna and flora.
https://wikileaks.org/tpp2/static/pdf/tpp-treaty-environment-chapter.pdf
Maybe Wyden should explain this discrepency because it looks to me like your assesment was right. He's lying.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)were in fact 6 of the 8 who voted for CAFTA, and all of them voted for NAFTA as well, either in the House or the Senate. DU has place much emphasis on Hillary Clinton's trade views, but Clinton was a CAFTA no vote. Lincoln Chafee voted for CAFTA as a Republican.
So anyone who pays attention would have known which Senators to pressure, and I have been. I believe DU's most affected passions about TPP have not been doing so.
To repeat, last week's yes votes were predicated by voting histories and telegraphed by each of the yes voters.
Ron Wyden is well aware that he has lost me as a supporter, he is unable to answer a simple question: If Brunei treated a racial or religious minority the way it treats LGBT people, would you still eagerly seek them out as favored trade partners, yes or no?
His support for Brunei lets me know he'd approve of stoning gay people here at home if it made him a buck. Same for Obama. According to them, LGBT people are not worthy of the lives we live.