Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

red dog 1

(27,816 posts)
Mon Jun 8, 2015, 04:43 PM Jun 2015

Ex-Intel Officials: Pentagon Report Proves US Complicity in ISIS

Bafeez Ahmed
OpEdNews.com
June 8, 2015


According to leading American and British intelligence agents, a declassified Pentagon report confirms that the West accelerated support to extremist rebels in Syria, despite knowing full well the strategy would pave the way for the emergence of the Islamic State (ISIS).

The experts who have spoken out include renowned government whistle-blowers such as the Pentagon's Daniel Ellsberg, the NSA's Thomas Drake, and the FBI's Coleen Rowley, among others.
Their remarks demonstrate the fraudulent nature of claims by two other officials, the CIA's Michael Morell and the NSA's John Schindler, both of whom attempt to absolve the Obama administration of responsibility for the policy failures exposed by the DIA documents.

As I reported on May 22, the US defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) document obtained by Judicial Watch under Freedom of Information confirms that the US intelligence community foresaw the rise of ISIS three years ago, as a direct consequence of the support to the extremist rebels in Syria.

The August 2012 "Information Intelligence Report" (IIR) reveals that the overwhelming core of the Syrian insurgency at that time was dominated by a range of Islamic militant groups, including al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI).
It warned that the "supporting powers to the insurgency" - identified in the document as the West, Gulf States, and Turkey - wanted to see the emergence of a "Salafist Principality" in Eastern Syria, to "isolate" the Assad regime.

The document also provided an extraordinarily prescient prediction that such an Islamic
quasi-statelet, backed the the region's Sunni states, would amplify the risk of the declaration of an "Islamic State" across Iraq and Syria.

The DIA report even anticipated the fall of Mosul and Ramadi.

Read more:
http://www.opednews.com



8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
1. their end goal is to topple Assad and install a pro-US/Saudi regime
Mon Jun 8, 2015, 04:56 PM
Jun 2015

"ISIS" is a marketing campaign for ongoing US involvement in Syria and Iraq. They are like the dirt that the door-to-door vacuum cleaner salesman throws on your carpet -- then you have to let us in to clean it up with our latest gizmos.

McCain knows ISIS "intimately" (yuck) and gets jealous when other GOPers talk about them:


Flo Mingo

(492 posts)
3. I've wondered for a long time....
Mon Jun 8, 2015, 05:14 PM
Jun 2015

If all that cash missing from the Iraq/Afghanistan wars isn't being used to fund ISIS. They're too damn organized, well trained and with a very capable PR team. Almost Hollywood-like, aren't they, in they're ability to instill fear and loathing.

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
4. There is a recipe for US involvement in overthrowing governments
Tue Jun 9, 2015, 07:01 AM
Jun 2015

1 - Crank up the fear -- say WMD, say "nuke-ya-ler" say anything.

2 - Say they are gaining ground and must be stopped

3 - Say the local government (or people) need our help

4 - Topple the government and keep the country weak.

Syria has been high on the list for over a decade:



newthinking

(3,982 posts)
5. I am not even sure that is the goal. They really don't seem to care about sufferring and death
Tue Jun 9, 2015, 08:03 AM
Jun 2015

of those in other countries.

It sometimes seems that simply mayhem, death, and destruction are objectives, not "side effects".

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
6. Assad gave a port on the Mediteranean to Russia and harbors Hezbollah (Iran / Shiite) militia
Tue Jun 9, 2015, 08:41 AM
Jun 2015

Overthrowing Assad is definitely a goal of the Pentagon and has been for at least 14 years now.

cprise

(8,445 posts)
7. Agreed. Which is why Fundamentalism is so useful
Wed Jun 10, 2015, 08:48 AM
Jun 2015

They get the cooperation of fighters who don't fear death, and even welcome it.

And the more chaotic the West makes that region, the more people are drawn to religious Fundamentalism.

If you read PNAC's manifesto, you can see an abiding fear of a non-Europeans that are advancing technologically. The goal seems to be to rid the M.E. of the relatively stable, secular dictatorships (the secular democracies were trashed long ago) that were accumulating engineering skills.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
2. Same old tune
Mon Jun 8, 2015, 05:08 PM
Jun 2015

We do this all the time. We support some band of crazies because they are fighting somebody we dislike. Then they win and we find out they're not our BFFs. Surprise!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Ex-Intel Officials: Penta...